Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Analytics

Should SMBs Invest In Cyber Risk Insurance?

Experts say the right policy could save even small enterprises from catastrophic losses

During the summer of 2009, online thieves used a compromised computer at Mountain View, Calif., demolition firm Ferma to sneak into the company's bank account and steal nearly half a million dollars.

As with many recent hacks, many associated with the Zeus Trojan, a rogue program planted by the attackers, transferred $447,000 to various financial accounts while Ferma's account manager banked online. The demolition firm had a knowledgeable IT manager and used a one-time password generator to secure access to the bank -- but because the attack came from its own computer, the company didn't stand a chance.

Ferma recovered about 60 percent of the money, but its bank refused to repay the remainder. Many companies have sued their banks to recover their losses, but others are taking a different approach: cyber risk insurance.

"Small companies can lose their whole business if they are not careful, so they should consider offloading some of their risk with insurance," says Larry Clinton, president of the Internet Security Alliance.

Cyber risk insurance is more than a decade old, but is a rapidly expanding market. This year companies will take out around $600 million in premiums for cyber risk, according to estimates from Betterley Risk Consultants, a Sterling, Mass., consulting firm.

Like Ferma, small and midsize businesses that do little business online may find they are the targets of online thieves. While cyber risk insurance is generally sought out by those companies that fear a breach that exposes customer data, it can also help SMBs survive a catastrophic loss, experts say.

Some companies have already seen the benefits from such policies. Online criminals stole $35,000 from Brookeland Fresh Water Supply District earlier this year, but the organization's bank recovered less than half of the money. But because Brookeland was insured, its insurance company paid all but a $500 deductible of the remaining losses, according to a recent report.

"A lot of businesses that were not the large players believe that they would not be the targets of cyberattacks," ISA's Clinton says. "The research has indicated that that is not at all the case. Smaller organizations have, according to some research, a larger chance of being attacked."

Generally, cyber risk insurance covers losses from almost a dozen different threats to business, including viruses, unauthorized access, personal injury, and loss of use. Covered damages include remediation, loss of property or services, and the cost to resecure systems and networks.

Yet, cyber insurance isn't a no-brainer. Policies tend to be costly because it is not always easy to assess the risks to a company's business, according to the Betterley report.

"We do have some concern that the claims for post-breach response are turning out to be more common and more expensive than carriers might have expected," the report states.

Underestimating the costs of cyberattacks has been a major hurdle for insurance, agrees Joshua Corman, research director of The 451 Group, an analyst firm.

"It is logical and intuitive that we would get to some maturity level in the industry that security would embrace insurance, but the devil is in the details," Corman says. "There are so many uncontrollables, however, that it may not be tenable."

For companies interested in assessing policies, the Internet Security Alliance provides a free publication, Financial Management of Cyber Risk: An Implementation Framework for CFOs.

Have a comment on this story? Please click "Discuss" below. If you'd like to contact Dark Reading's editors directly, send us a message. Veteran technology journalist of more than 20 years. Former research engineer. Written for more than two dozen publications, including CNET News.com, Dark Reading, MIT's Technology Review, Popular Science, and Wired News. Five awards for journalism, including Best Deadline ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
COVID-19: Latest Security News & Commentary
Dark Reading Staff 9/25/2020
Hacking Yourself: Marie Moe and Pacemaker Security
Gary McGraw Ph.D., Co-founder Berryville Institute of Machine Learning,  9/21/2020
Startup Aims to Map and Track All the IT and Security Things
Kelly Jackson Higgins, Executive Editor at Dark Reading,  9/22/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
Special Report: Computing's New Normal
This special report examines how IT security organizations have adapted to the "new normal" of computing and what the long-term effects will be. Read it and get a unique set of perspectives on issues ranging from new threats & vulnerabilities as a result of remote working to how enterprise security strategy will be affected long term.
Flash Poll
How IT Security Organizations are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
How IT Security Organizations are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
The COVID-19 pandemic turned the world -- and enterprise computing -- on end. Here's a look at how cybersecurity teams are retrenching their defense strategies, rebuilding their teams, and selecting new technologies to stop the oncoming rise of online attacks.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-15208
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-25
In tensorflow-lite before versions 1.15.4, 2.0.3, 2.1.2, 2.2.1 and 2.3.1, when determining the common dimension size of two tensors, TFLite uses a `DCHECK` which is no-op outside of debug compilation modes. Since the function always returns the dimension of the first tensor, malicious attackers can ...
CVE-2020-15209
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-25
In tensorflow-lite before versions 1.15.4, 2.0.3, 2.1.2, 2.2.1 and 2.3.1, a crafted TFLite model can force a node to have as input a tensor backed by a `nullptr` buffer. This can be achieved by changing a buffer index in the flatbuffer serialization to convert a read-only tensor to a read-write one....
CVE-2020-15210
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-25
In tensorflow-lite before versions 1.15.4, 2.0.3, 2.1.2, 2.2.1 and 2.3.1, if a TFLite saved model uses the same tensor as both input and output of an operator, then, depending on the operator, we can observe a segmentation fault or just memory corruption. We have patched the issue in d58c96946b and ...
CVE-2020-15211
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-25
In TensorFlow Lite before versions 1.15.4, 2.0.3, 2.1.2, 2.2.1 and 2.3.1, saved models in the flatbuffer format use a double indexing scheme: a model has a set of subgraphs, each subgraph has a set of operators and each operator has a set of input/output tensors. The flatbuffer format uses indices f...
CVE-2020-15212
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-25
In TensorFlow Lite before versions 2.2.1 and 2.3.1, models using segment sum can trigger writes outside of bounds of heap allocated buffers by inserting negative elements in the segment ids tensor. Users having access to `segment_ids_data` can alter `output_index` and then write to outside of `outpu...