These are trying times for Tesla.
At one point, the ultracool electric car company could do wrong, with founder and CEO Elon Musk heralded as one of the most innovative minds in technology. If Tesla could remake the car industry for the next century, then anything is possible.
However, over the last few months the company has come under more scrutiny due a pair of fatal crashes involving Tesla vehicles, pressure to produce more cars, complaints from Wall Street and investors as well as Musk's somewhat erratic behavior on social media.
Then came the memo early this week, written by Musk, claiming the company was investigating a case of internal sabotage carried out by a rogue employee.
On June 19, the company filed a lawsuit in US District Court in Nevada against the employee, Martin Tripp, who Tesla's attorney's charged "unlawfully hacked the company's confidential and trade secret information and transferred that information to third parties."
Specifically, the lawsuit claims:
…he also wrote computer code to periodically export Tesla's data off its network and into the hands of third parties. His hacking software was operating on three separate computer systems of other individuals at Tesla so that the data would be exported even after he left the company and so that those individuals would be falsely implicated as guilty parties.
These types of lawsuits and accusations -- it's not clear if there is a criminal case being pursued -- are never clear-cut and Tripp himself told CNN that after working at Tesla Gigafactory in Nevada, he came to believe the company was producing faulty batteries for its vehicles and he blew the whistle.
However, what the case does show is another example of what many enterprises face: insider threats that put data, whether it's company or personal information, at risk.
These types of threats are also not confined to well-known brands such as Tesla. Atlanta-based SunTrust Banks is investigating its own case of an insider stealing data to sell to a third party. (See SunTrust Investigation Shows Continuing Threats Posed by Insiders.)
Not to be outdone, the CIA is also reportedly probing its own insider problem as well. (See FBI Suspects Former CIA Worker of Vault 7 Leak – Report.)
By some estimates, insider threats can cost an enterprise more than $8 million to recover from, whether it's an employee with malicious intentions to steal and sell data, or a careless worker who causes a breach. (See Insider Threats Cost Enterprises More Than $8M Every Year – Report.)
In an email, Joseph Carson, the chief security scientist at security vendor Thycotic, noted that incidents such as Tesla, SunBank and others show my enterprises of all sizes need to not only restrict access to data, but also manage who has access to data and change those privileges as needed.
"Organizations continue to fail at the most important aspect on restricting privileged access which is proactively discovering privileged accounts in the environment," Carson wrote to Security Now. "It appears that Telsa has failed to do that most important step in the least privilege: discovering and detecting unapproved privileged access. This will likely be a major lesson for Telsa."
- IBM's USB Ban Earns Some Praise, Some Skepticism
- Equifax Filing Sheds Light on 2017 Data Breach Carnage
- Cybercriminals Increasingly Targeting 'Crown Jewels' Both Inside & Out
- AI: An Emerging Insider Threat?