Ransomware has captured the imagination of executives and IT professionals even though, taken in the context of all security issues, it's not really at the top of the list. Unless, of course, you're the one staring at a screen demanding a ransom payment in order to get your data back.
If you do see such a screen, do you pay the ransom or not? That's the question we asked in our most recent poll and the answers provided by our community were decisive. Half of the total taking the poll said that "Never!" is the only right answer when it comes to when a ransom should be paid. Another quarter said that paying up is a last resort, while 16% got judgmental, saying that paying a ransom is an admission that your backup and recover plans aren't what they should be.
As always, we recognize the limitations of our methods. We understand that the polls we conduct here on our pages aren't going to fuel academic research. That's why it's important that we properly label the conclusions. I think it's accurate to call them a Highly Opinionated, Not Especially Scientific Tally -- or, as I like to think of them: HONEST results.
Security Now community member Joe Stanganelli explained his "last resort" vote: "Game theory dictates that you never pay a blackmailer because there's nothing to prevent the blackmailer from blackmailing you again." That's a sentiment explained in more detail in Carl Herberger's recent article here at Security Now.
Herberger pointed out, "paying a ransom provides no safe harbor." He recognized, though, that business considerations often win out over principle when it comes to ransomware. "When facing a ransom attack, many companies must weigh the cost of paying the fee against the cost of downtime or a leak. The decision is not easy because ... paying a ransom just proves that a business is willing to pay."
So what is the "wisdom of the crowd" when it comes to paying a ransom? Stated simply, it's this: Never, ever pay a ransom -- unless you have to.