Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Vulnerabilities / Threats //

Advanced Threats

10/8/2019
05:20 PM
100%
0%

Utilities' Operational Networks Continue to Be Vulnerable

More than half of utilities have suffered an outage or data loss in the last 12 months, but only a minority of organizations seem ready for an attack that could affect operations, a survey finds.

A large proportion of the utility companies responsible for power generation, water supply, and other critical civil functions are unprepared for a cyberattack on the operational side of their business, despite more than half of utility professionals expecting an attack on critical infrastructure in the next year, according to a report published on October 7. 

The report draws conclusions from a survey conducted by the Ponemon Institute and sponsored by industrial control firm Siemens, which found that more than half of respondents had suffered a "shutdown or operational data loss" in the past year, and a quarter of firms had been the target of a "mega attack" involving a nation-state actor. 

Despite the worries, only 42% of utility professionals feel that their organization is ready for a cyberattack, while more than a third — 35% — do not even have a plan in place to respond to an attack on their operational technology, the survey found.

"Industrial cybersecurity has become one of the new risk frontiers," says Leo Simonovich, vice president and global head of industrial cyber for Siemens. "An attack targeting a power plant can force a shutdown or, in the worst case, a safety event. And while the frequency of these attacks has increased, utility organizations' readiness remains fairly low."

The Ponemon Institute surveyed 1,726 utility professionals, about two-thirds of whom were technicians or managers, with directors and supervisors making up another third, and senior executives making up 6% of the respondents. 

The Siemens-funded survey is not the only one to find concerns among professionals with the readiness of the world's utilities. A second survey, conducted by Dimensional Research on behalf of security firm Tripwire, found that 93% of industrial-control system (ICS) professionals worried that an attack could cause downtime. While almost three-quarters of firms had invested in cybersecurity, half of the ICS professionals thought that the investments were not enough.

"Cyberattacks against critical infrastructure and manufacturers pose a real threat to the safety, productivity, and quality of operations," Kristen Poulos, vice president and general manager of industrial cybersecurity at Tripwire, said in a statement. "In these environments, where virtual and physical converge, cyber events can interfere with an operator's ability to view, monitor, or control their processes."

Cybersecurity for operation technology (OT) and networks is not simple. Utilities have to contend with two aspects of their infrastructure that most companies do not have: A much longer useful lifetime for devices and the potential for physical damage to be caused by cyberattacks.

Siemens' Simonovich likens the issues to real estate, with brownfield (previously developed) land having needed infrastructure but often with legacy problems, and greenfield (undeveloped) land requiring more construction but that doesn't have baked-in issues. 

"You have a brownfield problem with existing assets, where digital has been bolted on top," he says. "And then you have greenfield problems of digital-native devices associated with renewables, but also highly distributed, decentralized, and hyper-intelligent. Because of their nature, they are more difficult to secure."

The lack of visibility — only half of companies have the lion's share, 70%, of their infrastructure documented, according to Tripwire's report — is already causing problems.

The destructive WannaCry and NotPetya attacks, for example, affected 25% of utilities, according to Siemens' report. Approximately 30% of attacks on operational technology are not detected, and breach studies have shown that the longer that an attack is not detected, the more significant and costly the damage. 

Utilities are also plagued by another issue that they have in common with the industry at large: a shortage of knowledgeable cybersecurity workers. While the rise of sophisticated attacks is considered the top threat that utilities have to overcome, more than half of those surveyed found the lack of skilled personnel to be a serious issue.

Overall, utilities have many of the same problems as companies in general, but because they represent critical infrastructure upon which companies and consumers rely, any attack could have much more serious impact.

"With these old power plants, they thought they were safe because they were air-gapped," says Simonovich. "Now, many of them are connected, and most of these assets have not been patched for years."

Related Content:

Check out The Edge, Dark Reading's new section for features, threat data, and in-depth perspectives. Today's top story: "Can the Girl Scouts Save the Moon from Cyberattack?"

Veteran technology journalist of more than 20 years. Former research engineer. Written for more than two dozen publications, including CNET News.com, Dark Reading, MIT's Technology Review, Popular Science, and Wired News. Five awards for journalism, including Best Deadline ... View Full Bio
 

Recommended Reading:

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
COVID-19: Latest Security News & Commentary
Dark Reading Staff 9/25/2020
9 Tips to Prepare for the Future of Cloud & Network Security
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  9/28/2020
Attacker Dwell Time: Ransomware's Most Important Metric
Ricardo Villadiego, Founder and CEO of Lumu,  9/30/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
Special Report: Computing's New Normal
This special report examines how IT security organizations have adapted to the "new normal" of computing and what the long-term effects will be. Read it and get a unique set of perspectives on issues ranging from new threats & vulnerabilities as a result of remote working to how enterprise security strategy will be affected long term.
Flash Poll
The State of Ransomware
The State of Ransomware
Ransomware has become one of the most prevalent new cybersecurity threats faced by today's enterprises. This new report from Dark Reading includes feedback from IT and IT security professionals about their organization's ransomware experiences, defense plans, and malware challenges. Find out what they had to say!
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-20902
PUBLISHED: 2020-10-01
Upgrading Crowd via XML Data Transfer can reactivate a disabled user from OpenLDAP. The affected versions are from before version 3.4.6 and from 3.5.0 before 3.5.1.
CVE-2019-20903
PUBLISHED: 2020-10-01
The hyperlinks functionality in atlaskit/editor-core in before version 113.1.5 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary HTML or JavaScript via a Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in link targets.
CVE-2020-25288
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-30
An issue was discovered in MantisBT before 2.24.3. When editing an Issue in a Project where a Custom Field with a crafted Regular Expression property is used, improper escaping of the corresponding form input's pattern attribute allows HTML injection and, if CSP settings permit, execution of arbitra...
CVE-2020-25781
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-30
An issue was discovered in file_download.php in MantisBT before 2.24.3. Users without access to view private issue notes are able to download the (supposedly private) attachments linked to these notes by accessing the corresponding file download URL directly.
CVE-2020-25830
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-30
An issue was discovered in MantisBT before 2.24.3. Improper escaping of a custom field's name allows an attacker to inject HTML and, if CSP settings permit, achieve execution of arbitrary JavaScript when attempting to update said custom field via bug_actiongroup_page.php.