Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Security Management

11/13/2017
06:00 PM
Curtis Franklin
Curtis Franklin
Curt Franklin
50%
50%

SOCs Become Service Targets

MSSPs are becoming SOCaaS providers. Is it a natural evolution or a short-lived phenomenon in the as-a-service world?

In the race to add ever more capabilities to the "as a service" lexicon, SOCaaS lacks a certain poetry. But what it lacks in linguistic beauty it may make up for in utility for organizations that need more capable security management without the complication or expense of building their own Security Operations Center (SOC).

In the broad market for managed service, SOCaaS is typically considered part of security-as-a-service offered by a managed security service provider (MSSP). So what is is that turns managed security into a full SOC provided by a partner?

According to Gartner, an MSSP, "...provides outsourced monitoring and management of security devices and systems. Common services include managed firewall, intrusion detection, virtual private network, vulnerability scanning and anti-viral services." A SOC, says Wikipedia, "...is a dedicated site where enterprise information systems (web sites, applications, databases, data centers and servers, networks, desktops and other endpoints) are monitored, assessed, and defended."

The difference, really, is the level of coordination and management supplied by the service provider. An MSSP can provide a variety of different security services and may coordinate two or more of them in a layered defense, but there's the assumption that someone at the hiring company is managing and directing the overall security provided by the services.

SOCaaS, on the other hand, is a much more thoroughly outsourced security system, with both human security experts and automated response systems sitting in the virtual SOC ready to monitor and respond to security issues. The customer may have an IT department that hires the provider and provides management from an IT perspective, but there's no real requirement for any internal security expertise on the buyer's part.

There are a number of companies that are actice the MSSP or related managed detection and response (MDR) markets. These companies include IBM, SecureWorks, Verizon, Symantec, HPE, AT&T, Atos and Arctic Wolf. The question is really how deeply into a client's IT infrastructure the managed services will extend.

In a recent case, the city of Sparks, Nev., explored the possibility of building a SOC to handle its growing security demands and decided instead to contract for a completely virtual SOCaaS with vendor Arctic Wolf. The decision was taken after a series of ransomware and spear-phishing attacks targeted the city's police and fire first responders. While no devastating damage occurred, the city IT staff recognized that a more coordinated effort would be necessary if attacks became larger or more sophisticated.

While MSSPs have become common security partners for the enterprise, especially for mid-size organizations in both government and commercial spaces, SOCaaS is still relatively early in its growth. Is a SOC-as-a-service something that your organization has adopted? Do you think it's an idea "with legs?" Let us know in the comments, below -- and let us know if you have any experience with SOCaaS.

Related posts:

— Curtis Franklin is the editor of SecurityNow.com. Follow him on Twitter @kg4gwa.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
COVID-19: Latest Security News & Commentary
Dark Reading Staff 8/3/2020
'BootHole' Vulnerability Exposes Secure Boot Devices to Attack
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  7/29/2020
Average Cost of a Data Breach: $3.86 Million
Jai Vijayan, Contributing Writer,  7/29/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
Special Report: Computing's New Normal, a Dark Reading Perspective
This special report examines how IT security organizations have adapted to the "new normal" of computing and what the long-term effects will be. Read it and get a unique set of perspectives on issues ranging from new threats & vulnerabilities as a result of remote working to how enterprise security strategy will be affected long term.
Flash Poll
The Threat from the Internetand What Your Organization Can Do About It
The Threat from the Internetand What Your Organization Can Do About It
This report describes some of the latest attacks and threats emanating from the Internet, as well as advice and tips on how your organization can mitigate those threats before they affect your business. Download it today!
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2017-18112
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-05
Affected versions of Atlassian Fisheye allow remote attackers to view the HTTP password of a repository via an Information Disclosure vulnerability in the logging feature. The affected versions are before version 4.8.3.
CVE-2020-15109
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-04
In solidus before versions 2.8.6, 2.9.6, and 2.10.2, there is an bility to change order address without triggering address validations. This vulnerability allows a malicious customer to craft request data with parameters that allow changing the address of the current order without changing the shipm...
CVE-2020-16847
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-04
Extreme Analytics in Extreme Management Center before 8.5.0.169 allows unauthenticated reflected XSS via a parameter in a GET request, aka CFD-4887.
CVE-2020-15135
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-04
save-server (npm package) before version 1.05 is affected by a CSRF vulnerability, as there is no CSRF mitigation (Tokens etc.). The fix introduced in version version 1.05 unintentionally breaks uploading so version v1.0.7 is the fixed version. This is patched by implementing Double submit. The CSRF...
CVE-2020-13522
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-04
An exploitable arbitrary file delete vulnerability exists in SoftPerfect RAM Disk 4.1 spvve.sys driver. A specially crafted I/O request packet (IRP) can allow an unprivileged user to delete any file on the filesystem. An attacker can send a malicious IRP to trigger this vulnerability.