Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Security Management //

SOC

12/17/2018
09:35 AM
Larry Loeb
Larry Loeb
Larry Loeb
50%
50%

Russian-Backed Sofacy Group Used New Cannon Trojan in Recent Attacks

Palo Alto Networks' Unit 42 has documented two months of attacks from the Sofacy group, which also goes by Fancy Bear and APT28. Researchers found the attackers deployed a new Trojan called Cannon.

With all the current turmoil in the cybersecurity area, it's easy to forget that there are persistent threat actors always out there.

One of the most persistent has long been the Russia-affiliated Sofacy group, which also goes by a host of other names: Fancy Bear, APT28, STRONTIUM, Pawn Storm and Sednit. Tied to many cyberespionage episodes, Palo Alto Networks has found that this mysterious group continues to advance its mission over the last several weeks.

In a blog post, researchers with Palo Alto's Unit 42 describe a global campaign that the group has undertaken in the last two months.

The targets were various government and private organizations around the world, and occurred from mid-October through mid-November of this year. The blog points out that the majority of targets were NATO-aligned nation states, although several former USSR nation states were also involved.

Example spear-phishing email delivered in Dear Joohn attacks.\r\n(Source: Palo Alto Networks)\r\n
Example spear-phishing email delivered in Dear Joohn attacks.
\r\n(Source: Palo Alto Networks)\r\n

The attacks featured the use of the Zebrocy Trojan as payload, which has been tracked since 2015. A new Trojan called Cannon has also been surfaced in these attacks.

Zebrocy collects specific information from the target systems and then sends it to the command and control (C&C) server. It will then respond with a secondary payload.

Cannon is a variant of this, using email to communicate with the C&C. Both exfiltrated data and secondary payloads are communicated through email messages.

Spear-phishing is the way that the latest attacks are launched.

Email accounts registered to legitimate email providers -- instead of spoofed email addresses or previously compromised accounts -- are used to lend legitimacy to the email. The account names used will appear to be normal government organization names or other trusted third-party entities. However, most of the observed phishing emails shared a common author named "Joohn."

The emails deliver a Microsoft Word document which embeds a remote template function. This template will then load a malicious macro document and load it in the same Microsoft Word session. If the C&C server for this macro document is not active, the download will fail.

The October attack wave relied on file names which ranged from Brexit to the Lion Air crash, as well as recent rocket attacks in Israel to entice the victim to open the document. In November, this changed to a more generic file name.

The Zebrocy variants delivered in this campaign were written in several different languages, including Delphi, C# and VB.NET. The C# and VB.NET variants used in this attack campaign were previously unknown to Palo Alto researchers.

They noted that instead of using systeminfo and tasklist commands to gather information, the C# variant of Zebrocy uses WMI queries.

The researchers sum the situation up this way:

The group clearly shows a preference for using a simple downloader like Zebrocy as first-stage payloads in these attacks. The group continues to develop new variations of Zebrocy by adding a VB.NET and C# version, and it appears that they also have used different variants of the Cannon tool in past attack campaigns.

Persistent threat actors change what they do continually, even when they use tactics similar to past efforts. Security people need to be aware of what they have done in the past, so they may be able to track what they might pull off in the future.

Related posts:

— Larry Loeb has written for many of the last century's major "dead tree" computer magazines, having been, among other things, a consulting editor for BYTE magazine and senior editor for the launch of WebWeek.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Edge-DRsplash-10-edge-articles
I Smell a RAT! New Cybersecurity Threats for the Crypto Industry
David Trepp, Partner, IT Assurance with accounting and advisory firm BPM LLP,  7/9/2021
News
Attacks on Kaseya Servers Led to Ransomware in Less Than 2 Hours
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  7/7/2021
Commentary
It's in the Game (but It Shouldn't Be)
Tal Memran, Cybersecurity Expert, CYE,  7/9/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
How Enterprises are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
Concerns over supply chain vulnerabilities and attack visibility drove some significant changes in enterprise cybersecurity strategies over the past year. Dark Reading's 2021 Strategic Security Survey showed that many organizations are staying the course regarding the use of a mix of attack prevention and threat detection technologies and practices for dealing with cyber threats.
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2021-34760
PUBLISHED: 2021-10-21
A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco TelePresence Management Suite (TMS) Software could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to conduct a cross-site scripting (XSS) attack against a user of the interface. This vulnerability is due to insufficient input validation by the ...
CVE-2021-34789
PUBLISHED: 2021-10-21
A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Tetration could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to perform a stored cross-site scripting (XSS) attack on an affected system. This vulnerability exists because the web-based management interface does not sufficiently validate user...
CVE-2021-39126
PUBLISHED: 2021-10-21
Affected versions of Atlassian Jira Server and Data Center allow remote attackers to modify various resources via a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability, following an Information Disclosure vulnerability in the referrer headers which discloses a user's CSRF token. The affected versions ar...
CVE-2021-39127
PUBLISHED: 2021-10-21
Affected versions of Atlassian Jira Server and Data Center allow anonymous remote attackers to the query component JQL endpoint via a Broken Access Control vulnerability (BAC) vulnerability. The affected versions are before version 8.5.10, and from version 8.6.0 before 8.13.1.
CVE-2021-40121
PUBLISHED: 2021-10-21
Multiple vulnerabilities in the web-based management interface of Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE) Software could allow an attacker to conduct a cross-site scripting (XSS) attack against a user of the interface. For more information about these vulnerabilities, see the Details section of this ad...