Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Security Management

01:00 PM
Curtis Franklin
Curtis Franklin
Curt Franklin

SANS Study Says Reputation Is a Cyber-Casualty

The latest security study says that you've probably been attacked and your reputation has taken the biggest hit.

There is, it seems, no end to the things that can keep security professionals up at night. A new SANS study, sponsored by Infoblox and McAfee, asked about that list of things and found that ransomware, insider threats and DoS attacks were at the top.

The survey, "Sensitive Data at Risk: The SANS 2017 Data Protection Survey," gathered data from over 250 IT security administrators, engineers, developers and privacy experts in North America. It asked, broadly, about what threats the professionals worry about, how badly those threats have hurt them and what to do about all the threats in the IT landscape.

Attacks are ubiquitous. Seventy-eight percent of the respondents reported that their organizations have seen two or more incidents involving the major threats in the last 12 months. In addition to the big three threats mentioned earlier, identity spoofing, privilege elevation and identity theft were among the threats that organizations dealt with, in the 12 months covered by the survey.

While attacks were common, significant data loss due to the attacks was not. Only 12% of those answering said that they had experienced a significant breach to sensitive data in the last 12 months. Of those who did, the most common data lost was user login and password data (more than 40%) followed by privileged credentials and customer-identifiable personal information (more than 30% each). With relatively little data actually lost, were companies really damaged by these attacks? According to the survey, they were, indeed.

What kind of pain results when the loss of critical information isn't the primary damage? Three types of damage stood at the top of the list of cyber-pain inflicted:

  • Loss of customer confidence
  • Legal headaches and fees
  • Loss of brand reputation

Two of these three could be seen as problems of perception; humans have trouble getting past the rules of the jungle, in which weakness means being cut from the pack and cast out. The pain that untrusting citizens don't inflict, the legal and regulatory systems do. Put them all together and they form a block of reasons to avoid becoming a victim if at all possible.

You're invited to attend Light Reading's Virtualizing the Cable Architecture event – a free breakfast panel at SCTE/ISBE's Cable-Tec Expo on October 18 featuring Comcast's Rob Howald and Charter's John Dickinson.

It's hard to defend against something if you don't know where it's coming from and there are two big sources of the pain inflicted on organizations through their IT systems. The first, not surprisingly, is hacking. Whether it takes the form of direct hacking or malware, criminals are a problem for more than 40% of companies taking the survey.

Next up is the insider threat. Now, it's important to note that this is not accidental loss from a clumsy or inattentive employee. No, this is insiders taking direct action against the organization, a problem faced by more than 35% of companies. No other source comes close to these two -- and defense has to address each.

So what's to be done about making things better? Step one is visibility. When the attacker knows more about your data, your applications or your network than you do, you're in a very vulnerable position.

The next step sounds the simplest: Do the things you know you need to do. Most security is common sense -- secure your assets and take care to control access to your systems -- but far too few organizations take the time and dedicate the resources to do the things that have long been known as best practices. Brush, floss, follow best security practices. These are things that you should do every day.

Related posts:

— Curtis Franklin is the editor of SecurityNow.com. Follow him on Twitter @kg4gwa.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
COVID-19: Latest Security News & Commentary
Dark Reading Staff 7/2/2020
Ripple20 Threatens Increasingly Connected Medical Devices
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  6/30/2020
DDoS Attacks Jump 542% from Q4 2019 to Q1 2020
Dark Reading Staff 6/30/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Current Issue
How Cybersecurity Incident Response Programs Work (and Why Some Don't)
This Tech Digest takes a look at the vital role cybersecurity incident response (IR) plays in managing cyber-risk within organizations. Download the Tech Digest today to find out how well-planned IR programs can detect intrusions, contain breaches, and help an organization restore normal operations.
Flash Poll
The Threat from the Internetand What Your Organization Can Do About It
The Threat from the Internetand What Your Organization Can Do About It
This report describes some of the latest attacks and threats emanating from the Internet, as well as advice and tips on how your organization can mitigate those threats before they affect your business. Download it today!
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
PUBLISHED: 2020-07-02
Apache Guacamole 1.1.0 and older may mishandle pointers involved inprocessing data received via RDP static virtual channels. If a userconnects to a malicious or compromised RDP server, a series ofspecially-crafted PDUs could result in memory corruption, possiblyallowing arbitrary code to be executed...
PUBLISHED: 2020-07-02
A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Unified Communications Manager, Cisco Unified Communications Manager Session Management Edition, Cisco Unified Communications Manager IM & Presence Service, and Cisco Unity Connection could allow an unauthenticated, remote attack...
PUBLISHED: 2020-07-02
In versions 3.0.0-3.5.0, 2.0.0-2.9.0, and 1.0.1, when users run the command displayed in NGINX Controller user interface (UI) to fetch the agent installer, the server TLS certificate is not verified.
PUBLISHED: 2020-07-02
In versions 3.0.0-3.5.0, 2.0.0-2.9.0, and 1.0.1, the Neural Autonomic Transport System (NATS) messaging services in use by the NGINX Controller do not require any form of authentication, so any successful connection would be authorized.
PUBLISHED: 2020-07-02
In versions 3.0.0-3.5.0, 2.0.0-2.9.0, and 1.0.1, the NGINX Controller installer starts the download of Kubernetes packages from an HTTP URL On Debian/Ubuntu system.