Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Security Management

11:05 AM
Scott Ferguson
Scott Ferguson
News Analysis-Security Now

Data Breaches Costing More C-Level Executives Their Jobs

A survey conducted by Kaspersky Labs shows that a major data breach can cost CIOs, CISOs and even CEOs their jobs, especially in North America.

As more data breaches make headlines each week, those executives seated in the C-Suite are starting to feel the pinch when it comes to these compromises in security. Specifically, more CIOs, CISOs and even CEOs are being shown the door after an incident, a new industry survey finds.

In North America, about 32% of all data breaches resulted in a C-level executive, president or even CEO of a company losing his or her job as part of the fallout, according to the study conducted by Kaspersky Labs and based on 5,878 interviews with businesses of all sizes from 29 countries.

The report, "From Data Boom to Data Doom: The Risks and Rewards of Protecting Personal Data," was released September 13.

Overall, about 42% of companies worldwide sustained a data breach in the last year, with the average incident costing enterprises about $1.23 million to clean up and repair the damage.

"I do believe this is a continuous, increasing trend over the past few years as more large-scale data breaches have made headlines," Rob Cataldo, vice president of Enterprise at Kaspersky Lab North America, wrote in an email to Security Now.

"In 2017, a wide variety of staff were let go from large-scale global companies as a result of data breaches: from CEOs to everyday employees who exposed the company customer data," Cataldo added.

As if to emphasize this point, British Airways is scrambling to explain how its website and mobile app were breached within the last several weeks, resulting in more than 380,000 customer records being stolen. It's not hard to imagine one or two executives being taken to task over this incident. (See British Airways Already Facing Lawsuits Following Data Breach.)

One reason why data breaches are increasing, and costing more executives their jobs, is the increasing reliance on cloud computing, including infrastructure-as-a-service (IaaS) and software-as-a-service (SaaS). (See AWS' Werner Vogels: 'Security Is Everyone's Job'.)

"Today, 20 percent of sensitive customer and corporate data resides outside the corporate perimeter, making that data much more difficult to control," Cataldo wrote. "When a data breach occurs, it's difficult to place the blame on specific staff, but it is one of the major consequences we are seeing over the past year."

Compliance pressure
In addition, new government rules and regulations, such as the General Data Protection Regulation laws now on the books in the European Union, are placing more accountability on companies. With fines as high as 4% of global revenue, enterprises will look to spread blame around, with the ax falling on those responsible to ensure compliance. (See European Union Braces for Liability Shift for Data Breaches.)

"For example, 72 percent of SMBs [small and midsized businesses] consider themselves well, or even perfectly, equipped for a data breach, yet only 25 percent can confirm that they have fully addressed the requirements for data protection as outlined by the GDPR," Cataldo added. "If an organization is not adhering to these laws, it can face strict fines and penalties, which can once again lead to blame and job loss amongst the C-suite."

With enterprises emphasizing that security is every employee's concern, the Kaspersky report found that lower-level workers also suffered job losses following a data breach. About 31% of companies sustaining a data breach last year let some employees go following a breach.

The Kaspersky report sidesteps the trickier issue of whether firing executives for a data breach is a justified punishment when security fails within the enterprise. After all, the Equifax breach of 2017 did lead to several dismissals, as well as federal charges against two different employees, including a CIO, for insider trading before the news was announced. (See Second Equifax Employee Facing Insider Trading Charges.)

In his email, Cataldo noted that security is a concern for every employee no matter their rank or position, and businesses need to be more careful and concerned when it comes to customer and corporate data.

"This report serves as a reminder that cybersecurity has real-life implications and is in fact everyone's concern," Cataldo wrote. "You can't pinpoint a specific job function and blame that staff for the cause of a data breach -- today, cybersecurity should be a priority and responsibility for everyone in the organization, from the C-suite, to third party contractors, interns and beyond."

Related posts:

— Scott Ferguson is the managing editor of Light Reading and the editor of Security Now. Follow him on Twitter @sferguson_LR.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
COVID-19: Latest Security News & Commentary
Dark Reading Staff 9/25/2020
Hacking Yourself: Marie Moe and Pacemaker Security
Gary McGraw Ph.D., Co-founder Berryville Institute of Machine Learning,  9/21/2020
Startup Aims to Map and Track All the IT and Security Things
Kelly Jackson Higgins, Executive Editor at Dark Reading,  9/22/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Current Issue
Special Report: Computing's New Normal
This special report examines how IT security organizations have adapted to the "new normal" of computing and what the long-term effects will be. Read it and get a unique set of perspectives on issues ranging from new threats & vulnerabilities as a result of remote working to how enterprise security strategy will be affected long term.
Flash Poll
How IT Security Organizations are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
How IT Security Organizations are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
The COVID-19 pandemic turned the world -- and enterprise computing -- on end. Here's a look at how cybersecurity teams are retrenching their defense strategies, rebuilding their teams, and selecting new technologies to stop the oncoming rise of online attacks.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-25
In tensorflow-lite before versions 1.15.4, 2.0.3, 2.1.2, 2.2.1 and 2.3.1, when determining the common dimension size of two tensors, TFLite uses a `DCHECK` which is no-op outside of debug compilation modes. Since the function always returns the dimension of the first tensor, malicious attackers can ...
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-25
In tensorflow-lite before versions 1.15.4, 2.0.3, 2.1.2, 2.2.1 and 2.3.1, a crafted TFLite model can force a node to have as input a tensor backed by a `nullptr` buffer. This can be achieved by changing a buffer index in the flatbuffer serialization to convert a read-only tensor to a read-write one....
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-25
In tensorflow-lite before versions 1.15.4, 2.0.3, 2.1.2, 2.2.1 and 2.3.1, if a TFLite saved model uses the same tensor as both input and output of an operator, then, depending on the operator, we can observe a segmentation fault or just memory corruption. We have patched the issue in d58c96946b and ...
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-25
In TensorFlow Lite before versions 1.15.4, 2.0.3, 2.1.2, 2.2.1 and 2.3.1, saved models in the flatbuffer format use a double indexing scheme: a model has a set of subgraphs, each subgraph has a set of operators and each operator has a set of input/output tensors. The flatbuffer format uses indices f...
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-25
In TensorFlow Lite before versions 2.2.1 and 2.3.1, models using segment sum can trigger writes outside of bounds of heap allocated buffers by inserting negative elements in the segment ids tensor. Users having access to `segment_ids_data` can alter `output_index` and then write to outside of `outpu...