Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Security Management //

Cloud

5/29/2018
08:05 AM
Eyal Benishti
Eyal Benishti
News Analysis-Security Now
Connect Directly
Twitter
LinkedIn
RSS
E-Mail vvv
50%
50%

Office 365 & G-Suite: How Email Security Is Failing Your Business

Microsoft's Office 365 and Google's G-Suite boast of many advanced features to secure email, however, as phishers and other attackers get better at attacking email platforms, these two companies need to do more to keep up.

There's no denying the immense popularity of Microsoft Office 365 and Google's G-Suite to business of all sizes. With a reported 60 million commercial users worldwide and 50,000 new users being added per month, Office 365 continues to outpace its "frenemy" at Google, which currently boasts about 3 million customers, and continues growing.

While there are benefits to these cloud-based business apps, the majority of users -- if not all of them -- use email the most.

Unfortunately, neither Office 365 or G-Suite are immune to the email phishing epidemic that today serves as the catalyst for almost nine out of ten cyberattacks. (See Phishers Are Finding Ways Around Office 365's ATP Feature.)

If you're unfamiliar with how phishing has evolved, know this: it has grown from a mere nuisance into a powerful hacking technique used to deliver fraudulent messages, ransomware and malware. To their credit, Microsoft and Google have increased efforts to safeguard the integrity of their users' mailboxes, and have done a respectable job at deploying email scanning and filters to root out spam and signature-based phishing emails.

However, both have been unable to identify and mitigate a very specific type of email phishing known as business email compromise (BEC) -- socially-engineered attacks that are meticulously designed without a malicious payload, such as an attachment or link, making it all but impossible for humans and most technology to distinguish. (See FBI: Ransomware Contributed to $1.4B in Losses in 2017.)

Common BEC schemes involve bogus invoices from trusted suppliers, CEO fraud, requests from HR for personal information on employees, solicitations to fill out tax forms and appeals to complete for time-sensitive wire transfers.

How hackers defeat email security
Attackers are intelligent and motivated. For example, they know that they can activate Office or G-Suite mailboxes as often as they would like, testing numerous attack methods through trial and error until they find a strategy that works. They also know that Office 365 and G-Suite deploy secure email gateway technology, which relies on signatures and adherence to rules to identify attacks.

Unfortunately, BEC does not conform to any such restrictions, and thus easily defeats gateway security.

As an example, a major Gmail vulnerability allowing spear-phishing emails to bypass its anti-phishing Sender Policy Framework (SPF) security was discovered. Dubbed the "Ronald Reagan attack" because it originated from Reagan.com, attackers sent malicious emails from an external server, tricking Gmail security into thinking the message was sent from an internal email account. Security experts attributed this vulnerability to a Google policy dubbed "dots don't matter," which ignores periods in email addresses -- for instance [email protected] and [email protected] would be recognized as one and the same.

Microsoft Office 365 Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) also has several well-known security vulnerabilities.

Researchers at Cyren analyzed more than 10 million messages sent through its servers last year and discovered 10% were spam, malware or phishing attempts. More recently, hackers devised a strategy that enables them to bypass Office 365's reputation filtering and SafeLinks, putting malicious emails straight into an inbox. Additionally, a newly discovered vulnerability called baseStriker, which splits and hides malicious links in phishing emails, has also proven to defeat Office 365 email security.

Keeping complex emails out of the inbox
Certainly, Office 365 and G-Suite do offer effective security at the macro level. Microsoft's ATP can now check links for redirects, scan attachments for malware, analyze emails for spoofing and scan for signs of phishing attacks.

It also features anti-spoofing frameworks such as SPF, Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Conformance (DMARC) and DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM), and sends real-time reports with visibility into all malicious emails targeted and blocked by Office 365.

Gmail has recently updated its service with new security features to provide better protection against malware and phishing scams. Its detection model uses the Safe Browsing service with a list of URLs by known ISPs. It has also implemented a new Security Checkup and phishing protections in Chrome.

But let's be clear: Until Office 365 and G-Suite can more effectively integrate social engineering defenses into their email security, all end users should look to supplement their phishing defenses with security at the mailbox level. Moving security down the stack from the server to the inbox can help identify and remediate social engineering attacks through analysis of account information and user communication habits to determine what "normal" communications should look like, and block messages that do not meet such criteria.

At a time when one single message can lead to a catastrophic breach, Office 365 and G-Suite simply aren't doing enough.

Related posts:

Eyal Benishti is a veteran malware researcher and the founder and CEO of IRONSCALES, an advanced phishing threat prevention platform.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
COVID-19: Latest Security News & Commentary
Dark Reading Staff 8/14/2020
Lock-Pickers Face an Uncertain Future Online
Seth Rosenblatt, Contributing Writer,  8/10/2020
Hacking It as a CISO: Advice for Security Leadership
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  8/10/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
7 New Cybersecurity Vulnerabilities That Could Put Your Enterprise at Risk
In this Dark Reading Tech Digest, we look at the ways security researchers and ethical hackers find critical vulnerabilities and offer insights into how you can fix them before attackers can exploit them.
Flash Poll
The Changing Face of Threat Intelligence
The Changing Face of Threat Intelligence
This special report takes a look at how enterprises are using threat intelligence, as well as emerging best practices for integrating threat intel into security operations and incident response. Download it today!
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-17475
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-14
Lack of authentication in the network relays used in MEGVII Koala 2.9.1-c3s allows attackers to grant physical access to anyone by sending packet data to UDP port 5000.
CVE-2020-0255
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-14
** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2020-10751. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2020-10751. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2020-10751 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidenta...
CVE-2020-14353
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-14
** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2017-18270. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2017-18270. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2017-18270 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidenta...
CVE-2020-17464
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-14
** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none.
CVE-2020-17473
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-14
Lack of mutual authentication in ZKTeco FaceDepot 7B 1.0.213 and ZKBiosecurity Server 1.0.0_20190723 allows an attacker to obtain a long-lasting token by impersonating the server.