Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Security Management //

Cloud

End of Bibblio RCM includes -->
5/29/2018
08:05 AM
Eyal Benishti
Eyal Benishti
News Analysis-Security Now
Connect Directly
Twitter
LinkedIn
RSS
E-Mail vvv

Office 365 & G-Suite: How Email Security Is Failing Your Business

Microsoft's Office 365 and Google's G-Suite boast of many advanced features to secure email, however, as phishers and other attackers get better at attacking email platforms, these two companies need to do more to keep up.

There's no denying the immense popularity of Microsoft Office 365 and Google's G-Suite to business of all sizes. With a reported 60 million commercial users worldwide and 50,000 new users being added per month, Office 365 continues to outpace its "frenemy" at Google, which currently boasts about 3 million customers, and continues growing.

While there are benefits to these cloud-based business apps, the majority of users -- if not all of them -- use email the most.

Unfortunately, neither Office 365 or G-Suite are immune to the email phishing epidemic that today serves as the catalyst for almost nine out of ten cyberattacks. (See Phishers Are Finding Ways Around Office 365's ATP Feature.)

If you're unfamiliar with how phishing has evolved, know this: it has grown from a mere nuisance into a powerful hacking technique used to deliver fraudulent messages, ransomware and malware. To their credit, Microsoft and Google have increased efforts to safeguard the integrity of their users' mailboxes, and have done a respectable job at deploying email scanning and filters to root out spam and signature-based phishing emails.

However, both have been unable to identify and mitigate a very specific type of email phishing known as business email compromise (BEC) -- socially-engineered attacks that are meticulously designed without a malicious payload, such as an attachment or link, making it all but impossible for humans and most technology to distinguish. (See FBI: Ransomware Contributed to $1.4B in Losses in 2017.)

Common BEC schemes involve bogus invoices from trusted suppliers, CEO fraud, requests from HR for personal information on employees, solicitations to fill out tax forms and appeals to complete for time-sensitive wire transfers.

How hackers defeat email security
Attackers are intelligent and motivated. For example, they know that they can activate Office or G-Suite mailboxes as often as they would like, testing numerous attack methods through trial and error until they find a strategy that works. They also know that Office 365 and G-Suite deploy secure email gateway technology, which relies on signatures and adherence to rules to identify attacks.

Unfortunately, BEC does not conform to any such restrictions, and thus easily defeats gateway security.

As an example, a major Gmail vulnerability allowing spear-phishing emails to bypass its anti-phishing Sender Policy Framework (SPF) security was discovered. Dubbed the "Ronald Reagan attack" because it originated from Reagan.com, attackers sent malicious emails from an external server, tricking Gmail security into thinking the message was sent from an internal email account. Security experts attributed this vulnerability to a Google policy dubbed "dots don't matter," which ignores periods in email addresses -- for instance [email protected] and [email protected] would be recognized as one and the same.

Microsoft Office 365 Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) also has several well-known security vulnerabilities.

Researchers at Cyren analyzed more than 10 million messages sent through its servers last year and discovered 10% were spam, malware or phishing attempts. More recently, hackers devised a strategy that enables them to bypass Office 365's reputation filtering and SafeLinks, putting malicious emails straight into an inbox. Additionally, a newly discovered vulnerability called baseStriker, which splits and hides malicious links in phishing emails, has also proven to defeat Office 365 email security.

Keeping complex emails out of the inbox
Certainly, Office 365 and G-Suite do offer effective security at the macro level. Microsoft's ATP can now check links for redirects, scan attachments for malware, analyze emails for spoofing and scan for signs of phishing attacks.

It also features anti-spoofing frameworks such as SPF, Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Conformance (DMARC) and DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM), and sends real-time reports with visibility into all malicious emails targeted and blocked by Office 365.

Gmail has recently updated its service with new security features to provide better protection against malware and phishing scams. Its detection model uses the Safe Browsing service with a list of URLs by known ISPs. It has also implemented a new Security Checkup and phishing protections in Chrome.

But let's be clear: Until Office 365 and G-Suite can more effectively integrate social engineering defenses into their email security, all end users should look to supplement their phishing defenses with security at the mailbox level. Moving security down the stack from the server to the inbox can help identify and remediate social engineering attacks through analysis of account information and user communication habits to determine what "normal" communications should look like, and block messages that do not meet such criteria.

At a time when one single message can lead to a catastrophic breach, Office 365 and G-Suite simply aren't doing enough.

Related posts:

Eyal Benishti is a veteran malware researcher and the founder and CEO of IRONSCALES, an advanced phishing threat prevention platform.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Edge-DRsplash-10-edge-articles
I Smell a RAT! New Cybersecurity Threats for the Crypto Industry
David Trepp, Partner, IT Assurance with accounting and advisory firm BPM LLP,  7/9/2021
News
Attacks on Kaseya Servers Led to Ransomware in Less Than 2 Hours
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  7/7/2021
Commentary
It's in the Game (but It Shouldn't Be)
Tal Memran, Cybersecurity Expert, CYE,  7/9/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
Incorporating a Prevention Mindset into Threat Detection and Response
Threat detection and response systems, by definition, are reactive because they have to wait for damage to be done before finding the attack. With a prevention-mindset, security teams can proactively anticipate the attacker's next move, rather than reacting to specific threats or trying to detect the latest techniques in real-time. The report covers areas enterprises should focus on: What positive response looks like. Improving security hygiene. Combining preventive actions with red team efforts.
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2022-25878
PUBLISHED: 2022-05-27
The package protobufjs before 6.11.3 are vulnerable to Prototype Pollution which can allow an attacker to add/modify properties of the Object.prototype. This vulnerability can occur in multiple ways: 1. by providing untrusted user input to util.setProperty or to ReflectionObject.setParsedOption ...
CVE-2021-27780
PUBLISHED: 2022-05-27
The software may be vulnerable to both Un-Auth XML interaction and unauthenticated device enrollment.
CVE-2021-27781
PUBLISHED: 2022-05-27
The Master operator may be able to embed script tag in HTML with alert pop-up display cookie.
CVE-2022-1897
PUBLISHED: 2022-05-27
Out-of-bounds Write in GitHub repository vim/vim prior to 8.2.
CVE-2022-20666
PUBLISHED: 2022-05-27
Multiple vulnerabilities in the web-based management interface of Cisco Common Services Platform Collector (CSPC) Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct a cross-site scripting (XSS) attack against a user of the interface. These vulnerabilities are due to insufficient va...