Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Risk

5/2/2019
04:14 PM
Dark Reading
Dark Reading
Products and Releases
50%
50%

With Launch of Securepairs.org Top Cybersecurity Experts stand up for Digital Right to Repair

Boston, Massachusetts, April 30, 2019 -- Leading information security experts are speaking up in support of right to repair laws that are being debated in state capitols and calling out electronics and technology industry efforts to keep replacement parts, documentation and diagnostic tools for digital devices secret in the name of cyber security.

Declaring “fixable stuff is secure stuff,” the group called for “facts not FUD” (fear, uncertainty and doubt) in the face of recent efforts to paint the right to repair as a cyber security risk. The group of more than 20 cyber security professionals includes some of the most regarded names in information security. Among them: Bruce Schneier of IBM and Harvard University, an author and globally recognized expert in cryptography; Gary McGraw, the computer scientist and author of 12 books on software security; pioneering vulnerability disclosure expert Katie Moussouris of Luta Security; Chris Wysopal, Chief Technology Officer at Veracode, Joe Grand (aka “Kingpin”) of Grand Idea Studio and Dan Geer, the Chief Information Security Officer of In-Q-Tel, a non-profit, venture arm of the CIA.

 “As cyber security professionals, we have a responsibility to provide accurate information and reliable advice to lawmakers who are considering Right to Repair laws,” said Joe Grand of Grand Idea Studio, a hardware hacker and embedded systems security expert.

No cyber risk in repair

“False and misleading information about the cyber risks of repair is being directed at state legislators who are considering right to repair laws,” said Paul Roberts, the founder of securepairs.org and Editor in Chief at The Security Ledger, an independent cyber security blog. “Securepairs.org is a voice of reason that will provide policy makers with accurate information about the security problems plaguing connected devices. We will make the case that right to repair laws will bring about a more secure, not less secure future.”

With right to repair laws proposed in 20 states, the technology, electronics and home appliance industries have gone on the offensive. Working through front groups and public relations firms, they are floating specious arguments about the cyber security risks of repair. In opinion pieces, blog posts and interviews, these groups are painting pro-consumer, pro-competition laws granting digital device owners access to service manuals, diagnostic software or replacement parts as a safety risk and a giveaway to hackers and cyber criminals. 

"We've seen industry opponents using dubious cybersecurity arguments to claim we shouldn't have the freedom to fix the things we own,” said Nathan Proctor, the head of U.S. PIRG’s Right to Repair campaign. “I'm grateful the real experts are standing up, and setting the record straight: There is no cyber threat from repair. Just let us fix our stuff."

Security issues with connected devices are real enough, notes Roberts. But they have nothing to do with the kinds of measures promoted in right to repair laws. “Home electronics, personal electronic devices and smart appliances too often ship with easily exploitable software vulnerabilities or insecure configurations. These are the digital equivalent of unlocked or unlockable doors that hackers can step through,” Roberts said. “Sadly, device manufacturers, working through their industry groups, PR firms and paid lobbyists, are spending money trying to sink right to repair legislation that is totally unrelated to these problems,” he said.

“We know from hard experience that security through obscurity is a myth,” said Grand. “Keeping the workings of electronic devices secret does nothing to reduce the threat from motivated, resourceful hackers or cyber criminals. Instead, it prevents legitimate owners from maintaining and repairing their property as they see fit. Manufacturers who support Right to Repair will actually improve, not weaken, security by providing access to documentation and genuine, high quality replacement components,” he said.

Building a nation-wide network of security professionals

Securepairs.org is launching to help mobilize information security professionals to help secure the right to repair in their home states: writing letters and emails and providing expert testimony about the real sources of cyber risks in connected devices. The group is looking to brief lawmakers and to encourage other information security professionals to sign up via its website.

About securepairs.org

Securepairs.org is a not-for-profit, volunteer organization representing information security professionals who support the right to repair. Lawmakers and the public need facts not FUD regarding a digital right repair. Securepairs.org provides a platform for information (“cyber”) professionals to speak with one voice in support of the digital repair rights of owners.

Securepairs.org:
Paul Roberts, Founder Securepairs.org

Email: [email protected] |

Mobile: +1 617 817-0198
Twitter: @paulfroberts | @securepairs

US PIRG

Nathan Proctor

Campaign Director Right to Repair

Email: [email protected]

Mobile: +1 203 522-3860

Twitter: @nproctor

 

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Windows 10 Migration: Getting It Right
Kevin Alexandra, Principal Solutions Engineer at BeyondTrust,  5/15/2019
Baltimore Ransomware Attack Takes Strange Twist
Kelly Jackson Higgins, Executive Editor at Dark Reading,  5/14/2019
When Older Windows Systems Won't Die
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  5/17/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win a Starbucks Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: This comment is waiting for review by our moderators.
Current Issue
Building and Managing an IT Security Operations Program
As cyber threats grow, many organizations are building security operations centers (SOCs) to improve their defenses. In this Tech Digest you will learn tips on how to get the most out of a SOC in your organization - and what to do if you can't afford to build one.
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-12184
PUBLISHED: 2019-05-19
There is XSS in browser/components/MarkdownPreview.js in BoostIO Boostnote 0.11.15 via a label named flowchart, sequence, gallery, or chart, as demonstrated by a crafted SRC attribute of an IFRAME element, a different vulnerability than CVE-2019-12136.
CVE-2019-12173
PUBLISHED: 2019-05-18
MacDown 0.7.1 (870) allows remote code execution via a file:\\\ URI, with a .app pathname, in the HREF attribute of an A element. This is different from CVE-2019-12138.
CVE-2019-12172
PUBLISHED: 2019-05-17
Typora 0.9.9.21.1 (1913) allows arbitrary code execution via a modified file: URL syntax in the HREF attribute of an AREA element, as demonstrated by file:\\\ on macOS or Linux, or file://C| on Windows. This is different from CVE-2019-12137.
CVE-2019-12168
PUBLISHED: 2019-05-17
Four-Faith Wireless Mobile Router F3x24 v1.0 devices allow remote code execution via the Command Shell (aka Administration > Commands) screen.
CVE-2019-12170
PUBLISHED: 2019-05-17
ATutor through 2.2.4 is vulnerable to arbitrary file uploads via the mods/_core/backups/upload.php (aka backup) component. This may result in remote command execution. An attacker can use the instructor account to fully compromise the system using a crafted backup ZIP archive. This will allow for PH...