Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Perimeter

8/17/2009
11:01 AM
Sara Peters
Sara Peters
Commentary
Connect Directly
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Who Are These Followers And Followees of the Twitter Botnet?

Social networks really do bring people together, don't they? Old friends. Long-lost relatives. Bots and bot-herders. Warms the heart.

Social networks really do bring people together, don't they? Old friends. Long-lost relatives. Bots and bot-herders. Warms the heart.Last Thursday, Jose Nazario, Arbor Networks' manager of security research, discovered a Twitter account--username "upd4t3"--being used as a botnet command-and-control center.

Bot-herders have been troubled to find a safe and reliable way to communicate new commands to their bots, often migrating from one technology to another, and this is the first known instance of one using a micro-blog. Bully for upd4t3.

Says Nazario: "We maintain a database of malicious connections--malware, attacks, etc.--and I went looking more deeply for any suspicious connections to Twitter.com that may be a part of the DDoS attacks from the past two weeks. A handful of connections to Twitter accounts and profiles looked suspicious, but only one of them in that round turned out to be a bot."

The Twitter status updates were obfuscated links to new download code (which Symantec is calling Downloader.Sninfs), which would, in turn, download another piece of malware--currently an info-stealer called Infostealer.Bancos (by Symantec), which mimics Brazilian banks and steals access credentials. Bots retrieved these updates through the RSS feed of upd4t3's tweets.

Nazario notified security folks at Twitter, who immediately suspended the account.

However, what interests me is that based on this screenshot provided by Symantec, upd4t3 had 7 followers and was following 20 users. (The screenshot is also located on Nazario's blog, but the image was loaded up from Flickr so I thought you'd rather I give you a different link.) So, the big curiosity needling me is: who are these 20 followees and these 7 followers?

Looking at the screen shot, we can see that the botnet C&C is interested in the goings-on of LIFE Magazine and E! News. (I can't imagine that LIFE would be thrilled to find themselves in the same club as E! News. That might be worse than being in the same club as a bot-herder.)

As for the rest, Nazario says he doesn't know. "The bots themselves used the RSS feed, which does not register in the following stats on a user's profile." In other words, there's no reason to believe that those 27 users are bots, because there's no need for owners (not pwners) of bot computers to "follow" upd4t3; they just need to subscribe to upd4t3's RSS feed.

Nonetheless, they are real Twitter user accounts, with usernames and profile photos and everything. They could be phony people, of course. And there's not necessarily any way to know what the relationship is between upd4t3 and the others. They're quite likely just for show, to throw off the suspicion that might be raised by a regularly posting account with no followers or followees. Yet, if they saw fit to do so, Twitter could easily cancel those accounts. Or at least notify the users that they are following or being followed by a botnet C&C.

I'm trying to find out the usernames of all the followers/ees, and I've put in a few questions to Twitter but haven't received any responses yet. More details, hopefully, to come.

(Also, it was later discovered that the user "upd4t3" had accounts on Jaiku, which canceled the account, and Tumblr, which the user had already abandoned.)

Update on upd4t3, 3:27 ET: Nazario sent me a link to the Google cache of upd4t3's page: http://is.gd/2lbgf. Unfortunately he doesn't have access to the cached page displaying the followers. However a look at the first page shows more evidence of the uneven cultural tastes of our bot-herders. The individuals they follow include Eddie Izzard (excellent), Penn Jilette (eh, I'm not so much into Vegas-style magic-comedy), MC Hammer (or sorry, he just goes by "Hammer" now), and Bob Vila (and that's hysterical).

All of those accounts remain active.

Still no word from Twitter's PR people, and no postings about this on the Twitter blog.

Sara Peters is senior editor at Computer Security Institute. Special to Dark Reading. Sara Peters is Senior Editor at Dark Reading and formerly the editor-in-chief of Enterprise Efficiency. Prior that she was senior editor for the Computer Security Institute, writing and speaking about virtualization, identity management, cybersecurity law, and a myriad ... View Full Bio

 

Recommended Reading:

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
COVID-19: Latest Security News & Commentary
Dark Reading Staff 8/10/2020
Researcher Finds New Office Macro Attacks for MacOS
Curtis Franklin Jr., Senior Editor at Dark Reading,  8/7/2020
Hacking It as a CISO: Advice for Security Leadership
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  8/10/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
Special Report: Computing's New Normal, a Dark Reading Perspective
This special report examines how IT security organizations have adapted to the "new normal" of computing and what the long-term effects will be. Read it and get a unique set of perspectives on issues ranging from new threats & vulnerabilities as a result of remote working to how enterprise security strategy will be affected long term.
Flash Poll
The Changing Face of Threat Intelligence
The Changing Face of Threat Intelligence
This special report takes a look at how enterprises are using threat intelligence, as well as emerging best practices for integrating threat intel into security operations and incident response. Download it today!
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-8720
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-13
Buffer overflow in a subsystem for some Intel(R) Server Boards, Server Systems and Compute Modules before version 1.59 may allow a privileged user to potentially enable denial of service via local access.
CVE-2020-12300
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-13
Uninitialized pointer in BIOS firmware for Intel(R) Server Board Families S2600CW, S2600KP, S2600TP, and S2600WT may allow a privileged user to potentially enable escalation of privilege via local access.
CVE-2020-12301
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-13
Improper initialization in BIOS firmware for Intel(R) Server Board Families S2600ST, S2600BP and S2600WF may allow a privileged user to potentially enable escalation of privilege via local access.
CVE-2020-7307
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-13
Unprotected Storage of Credentials vulnerability in McAfee Data Loss Prevention (DLP) for Mac prior to 11.5.2 allows local users to gain access to the RiskDB username and password via unprotected log files containing plain text credentials.
CVE-2020-8679
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-13
Out-of-bounds write in Kernel Mode Driver for some Intel(R) Graphics Drivers before version 26.20.100.7755 may allow an authenticated user to potentially enable denial of service via local access.