Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Risk

7/15/2019
09:30 AM
Kelly Sheridan
Kelly Sheridan
Slideshows
Connect Directly
Twitter
LinkedIn
Google+
RSS
E-Mail

Where Businesses Waste Endpoint Security Budgets

Too many systems, failure to test tools, and fear of replacement drive endpoint complexity and render products less effective.
3 of 9

Fear of Rip-and-Replace

Many businesses still use legacy antivirus systems but hesitate to do a full system overhaul because of its potential effects on the organization, Comodo's Evangelakos says. The process is oftentimes hard and complex, not only buying and testing a solution, but evaluating its overall impact.

"A lot of concerns come after testing: How much effort will we spend on ripping and replacing a solution in an enterprise environment?" he explains. After all, replacing an antivirus system "isn't a small deal." Many businesses are worried about the upfront cost of replacement and the challenges they'll run into during the installation process, Evangelakos adds. They're concerned about their bandwidth to replace everything they currently have, what the implementation will cost, and whether a new tool will more effectively reduce their risk. The result, he continues, is a lot of layering.

"Somebody doesn't want to tip a tool out because it drives risk, so spending goes up from the tool perspective because they don't want to replace what they already have," he explains. This means renewing contracts with legacy antivirus vendors, buying endpoint detection and response (EDR) tools, and adding more personnel to their security operations centers. "In some cases, if you do have five solutions and you're renewing these contracts, you may have different teams and different personnel who may not integrate," Evangelakos says. "The operational cost to that is high as well."

(Image: XtravaganT stock.adobe.com)

3 of 9
Comment  | 
Print  | 
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Lyngiten
50%
50%
Lyngiten,
User Rank: Apprentice
7/16/2019 | 8:04:06 AM
Buisness waste
This new term is really popular today because of circumstances
Lyngiten
50%
50%
Lyngiten,
User Rank: Apprentice
7/16/2019 | 8:03:22 AM
Buisness waste
This new term is really popular today because of circumstances
Salttheworld
100%
0%
Salttheworld,
User Rank: Apprentice
7/15/2019 | 12:04:40 PM
Great Content on Endpoint Security
Thank you for the post as it does hit the nail on the head with what I have seen in organizations as well. There are a lot of point solutions that different teams use which creates a disconnect when it comes to securing an environment.

I think the biggest disconnect and you briefly touched on it when you mentioned tools that "remediate" is between IT and security. a lot of the tools people invest in can detect the problem, but the "remediation" is just creating a report to hand off to another group to go fix. To me, this creates holes in keeping a compliant environment when you have to wait for someone to fix the issues and get back to you when it is finished.

Actual remediation rare and I believe tools that can help connect the IT and Security sides of the house are the tools that are most valuable and worth taking the time to look into.
COVID-19: Latest Security News & Commentary
Dark Reading Staff 6/5/2020
Abandoned Apps May Pose Security Risk to Mobile Devices
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  5/29/2020
How AI and Automation Can Help Bridge the Cybersecurity Talent Gap
Peter Barker, Chief Product Officer at ForgeRock,  6/1/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win a Starbucks Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: What? IT said I needed virus protection!
Current Issue
How Cybersecurity Incident Response Programs Work (and Why Some Don't)
This Tech Digest takes a look at the vital role cybersecurity incident response (IR) plays in managing cyber-risk within organizations. Download the Tech Digest today to find out how well-planned IR programs can detect intrusions, contain breaches, and help an organization restore normal operations.
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-13842
PUBLISHED: 2020-06-05
An issue was discovered on LG mobile devices with Android OS 7.2, 8.0, 8.1, 9, and 10 (MTK chipsets). A dangerous AT command was made available even though it is unused. The LG ID is LVE-SMP-200010 (June 2020).
CVE-2020-13843
PUBLISHED: 2020-06-05
An issue was discovered on LG mobile devices with Android OS software before 2020-06-01. Local users can cause a denial of service because checking of the userdata partition is mishandled. The LG ID is LVE-SMP-200014 (June 2020).
CVE-2020-13839
PUBLISHED: 2020-06-05
An issue was discovered on LG mobile devices with Android OS 7.2, 8.0, 8.1, 9, and 10 (MTK chipsets). Code execution can occur via a custom AT command handler buffer overflow. The LG ID is LVE-SMP-200007 (June 2020).
CVE-2020-13840
PUBLISHED: 2020-06-05
An issue was discovered on LG mobile devices with Android OS 7.2, 8.0, 8.1, 9, and 10 (MTK chipsets). Code execution can occur via an MTK AT command handler buffer overflow. The LG ID is LVE-SMP-200008 (June 2020).
CVE-2020-13841
PUBLISHED: 2020-06-05
An issue was discovered on LG mobile devices with Android OS 9 and 10 (MTK chipsets). An AT command handler allows attackers to bypass intended access restrictions. The LG ID is LVE-SMP-200009 (June 2020).