Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Risk

7/15/2019
09:30 AM
Kelly Sheridan
Kelly Sheridan
Slideshows
Connect Directly
Twitter
LinkedIn
Google+
RSS
E-Mail

Where Businesses Waste Endpoint Security Budgets

Too many systems, failure to test tools, and fear of replacement drive endpoint complexity and render products less effective.
3 of 9

Fear of Rip-and-Replace
Many businesses still use legacy antivirus systems but hesitate to do a full system overhaul because of its potential effects on the organization, Comodo's Evangelakos says. The process is oftentimes hard and complex, not only buying and testing a solution, but evaluating its overall impact.
'A lot of concerns come after testing: How much effort will we spend on ripping and replacing a solution in an enterprise environment?' he explains. After all, replacing an antivirus system 'isn't a small deal.' Many businesses are worried about the upfront cost of replacement and the challenges they'll run into during the installation process, Evangelakos adds. They're concerned about their bandwidth to replace everything they currently have, what the implementation will cost, and whether a new tool will more effectively reduce their risk. The result, he continues, is a lot of layering.
'Somebody doesn't want to tip a tool out because it drives risk, so spending goes up from the tool perspective because they don't want to replace what they already have,' he explains. This means renewing contracts with legacy antivirus vendors, buying endpoint detection and response (EDR) tools, and adding more personnel to their security operations centers. 'In some cases, if you do have five solutions and you're renewing these contracts, you may have different teams and different personnel who may not integrate,' Evangelakos says. 'The operational cost to that is high as well.'
(Image: XtravaganT - stock.adobe.com)

Fear of Rip-and-Replace

Many businesses still use legacy antivirus systems but hesitate to do a full system overhaul because of its potential effects on the organization, Comodo's Evangelakos says. The process is oftentimes hard and complex, not only buying and testing a solution, but evaluating its overall impact.

"A lot of concerns come after testing: How much effort will we spend on ripping and replacing a solution in an enterprise environment?" he explains. After all, replacing an antivirus system "isn't a small deal." Many businesses are worried about the upfront cost of replacement and the challenges they'll run into during the installation process, Evangelakos adds. They're concerned about their bandwidth to replace everything they currently have, what the implementation will cost, and whether a new tool will more effectively reduce their risk. The result, he continues, is a lot of layering.

"Somebody doesn't want to tip a tool out because it drives risk, so spending goes up from the tool perspective because they don't want to replace what they already have," he explains. This means renewing contracts with legacy antivirus vendors, buying endpoint detection and response (EDR) tools, and adding more personnel to their security operations centers. "In some cases, if you do have five solutions and you're renewing these contracts, you may have different teams and different personnel who may not integrate," Evangelakos says. "The operational cost to that is high as well."

(Image: XtravaganT stock.adobe.com)

3 of 9
Comment  | 
Print  | 
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Lyngiten
50%
50%
Lyngiten,
User Rank: Apprentice
7/16/2019 | 8:04:06 AM
Buisness waste
This new term is really popular today because of circumstances
Lyngiten
50%
50%
Lyngiten,
User Rank: Apprentice
7/16/2019 | 8:03:22 AM
Buisness waste
This new term is really popular today because of circumstances
Salttheworld
100%
0%
Salttheworld,
User Rank: Apprentice
7/15/2019 | 12:04:40 PM
Great Content on Endpoint Security
Thank you for the post as it does hit the nail on the head with what I have seen in organizations as well. There are a lot of point solutions that different teams use which creates a disconnect when it comes to securing an environment.

I think the biggest disconnect and you briefly touched on it when you mentioned tools that "remediate" is between IT and security. a lot of the tools people invest in can detect the problem, but the "remediation" is just creating a report to hand off to another group to go fix. To me, this creates holes in keeping a compliant environment when you have to wait for someone to fix the issues and get back to you when it is finished.

Actual remediation rare and I believe tools that can help connect the IT and Security sides of the house are the tools that are most valuable and worth taking the time to look into.
Data Leak Week: Billions of Sensitive Files Exposed Online
Kelly Jackson Higgins, Executive Editor at Dark Reading,  12/10/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win a Starbucks Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: Our Endpoint Protection system is a little outdated... 
Current Issue
The Year in Security: 2019
This Tech Digest provides a wrap up and overview of the year's top cybersecurity news stories. It was a year of new twists on old threats, with fears of another WannaCry-type worm and of a possible botnet army of Wi-Fi routers. But 2019 also underscored the risk of firmware and trusted security tools harboring dangerous holes that cybercriminals and nation-state hackers could readily abuse. Read more.
Flash Poll
Rethinking Enterprise Data Defense
Rethinking Enterprise Data Defense
Frustrated with recurring intrusions and breaches, cybersecurity professionals are questioning some of the industrys conventional wisdom. Heres a look at what theyre thinking about.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-12420
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-12
In Apache SpamAssassin before 3.4.3, a message can be crafted in a way to use excessive resources. Upgrading to SA 3.4.3 as soon as possible is the recommended fix but details will not be shared publicly.
CVE-2019-16774
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-12
In phpfastcache before 5.1.3, there is a possible object injection vulnerability in cookie driver.
CVE-2018-11805
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-12
In Apache SpamAssassin before 3.4.3, nefarious CF files can be configured to run system commands without any output or errors. With this, exploits can be injected in a number of scenarios. In addition to upgrading to SA 3.4.3, we recommend that users should only use update channels or 3rd party .cf ...
CVE-2019-5061
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-12
An exploitable denial-of-service vulnerability exists in the hostapd 2.6, where an attacker could trigger AP to send IAPP location updates for stations, before the required authentication process has completed. This could lead to different denial of service scenarios, either by causing CAM table att...
CVE-2019-5062
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-12
An exploitable denial-of-service vulnerability exists in the 802.11w security state handling for hostapd 2.6 connected clients with valid 802.11w sessions. By simulating an incomplete new association, an attacker can trigger a deauthentication against stations using 802.11w, resulting in a denial of...