Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Risk

7/15/2019
09:30 AM
Kelly Sheridan
Kelly Sheridan
Slideshows
Connect Directly
Twitter
LinkedIn
Google+
RSS
E-Mail

Where Businesses Waste Endpoint Security Budgets

Too many systems, failure to test tools, and fear of replacement drive endpoint complexity and render products less effective.
3 of 9

Fear of Rip-and-Replace
Many businesses still use legacy antivirus systems but hesitate to do a full system overhaul because of its potential effects on the organization, Comodo's Evangelakos says. The process is oftentimes hard and complex, not only buying and testing a solution, but evaluating its overall impact.
'A lot of concerns come after testing: How much effort will we spend on ripping and replacing a solution in an enterprise environment?' he explains. After all, replacing an antivirus system 'isn't a small deal.' Many businesses are worried about the upfront cost of replacement and the challenges they'll run into during the installation process, Evangelakos adds. They're concerned about their bandwidth to replace everything they currently have, what the implementation will cost, and whether a new tool will more effectively reduce their risk. The result, he continues, is a lot of layering.
'Somebody doesn't want to tip a tool out because it drives risk, so spending goes up from the tool perspective because they don't want to replace what they already have,' he explains. This means renewing contracts with legacy antivirus vendors, buying endpoint detection and response (EDR) tools, and adding more personnel to their security operations centers. 'In some cases, if you do have five solutions and you're renewing these contracts, you may have different teams and different personnel who may not integrate,' Evangelakos says. 'The operational cost to that is high as well.'
(Image: XtravaganT - stock.adobe.com)

Fear of Rip-and-Replace

Many businesses still use legacy antivirus systems but hesitate to do a full system overhaul because of its potential effects on the organization, Comodo's Evangelakos says. The process is oftentimes hard and complex, not only buying and testing a solution, but evaluating its overall impact.

"A lot of concerns come after testing: How much effort will we spend on ripping and replacing a solution in an enterprise environment?" he explains. After all, replacing an antivirus system "isn't a small deal." Many businesses are worried about the upfront cost of replacement and the challenges they'll run into during the installation process, Evangelakos adds. They're concerned about their bandwidth to replace everything they currently have, what the implementation will cost, and whether a new tool will more effectively reduce their risk. The result, he continues, is a lot of layering.

"Somebody doesn't want to tip a tool out because it drives risk, so spending goes up from the tool perspective because they don't want to replace what they already have," he explains. This means renewing contracts with legacy antivirus vendors, buying endpoint detection and response (EDR) tools, and adding more personnel to their security operations centers. "In some cases, if you do have five solutions and you're renewing these contracts, you may have different teams and different personnel who may not integrate," Evangelakos says. "The operational cost to that is high as well."

(Image: XtravaganT stock.adobe.com)

3 of 9
Comment  | 
Print  | 
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Lyngiten
50%
50%
Lyngiten,
User Rank: Apprentice
7/16/2019 | 8:04:06 AM
Buisness waste
This new term is really popular today because of circumstances
Lyngiten
50%
50%
Lyngiten,
User Rank: Apprentice
7/16/2019 | 8:03:22 AM
Buisness waste
This new term is really popular today because of circumstances
Salttheworld
100%
0%
Salttheworld,
User Rank: Apprentice
7/15/2019 | 12:04:40 PM
Great Content on Endpoint Security
Thank you for the post as it does hit the nail on the head with what I have seen in organizations as well. There are a lot of point solutions that different teams use which creates a disconnect when it comes to securing an environment.

I think the biggest disconnect and you briefly touched on it when you mentioned tools that "remediate" is between IT and security. a lot of the tools people invest in can detect the problem, but the "remediation" is just creating a report to hand off to another group to go fix. To me, this creates holes in keeping a compliant environment when you have to wait for someone to fix the issues and get back to you when it is finished.

Actual remediation rare and I believe tools that can help connect the IT and Security sides of the house are the tools that are most valuable and worth taking the time to look into.
HackerOne Drops Mobile Voting App Vendor Voatz
Dark Reading Staff 3/30/2020
Limited-Time Free Offers to Secure the Enterprise Amid COVID-19
Curtis Franklin Jr., Senior Editor at Dark Reading,  3/31/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
6 Emerging Cyber Threats That Enterprises Face in 2020
This Tech Digest gives an in-depth look at six emerging cyber threats that enterprises could face in 2020. Download your copy today!
Flash Poll
State of Cybersecurity Incident Response
State of Cybersecurity Incident Response
Data breaches and regulations have forced organizations to pay closer attention to the security incident response function. However, security leaders may be overestimating their ability to detect and respond to security incidents. Read this report to find out more.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-11547
PUBLISHED: 2020-04-05
PRTG Network Monitor before 20.1.57.1745 allows remote unauthenticated attackers to obtain information about probes running or the server itself (CPU usage, memory, Windows version, and internal statistics) via an HTTP request, as demonstrated by type=probes to login.htm or index.htm.
CVE-2020-11548
PUBLISHED: 2020-04-05
The Search Meter plugin through 2.13.2 for WordPress allows user input introduced in the search bar to be any formula. The attacker could achieve remote code execution via CSV injection if a wp-admin/index.php?page=search-meter Export is performed.
CVE-2020-11542
PUBLISHED: 2020-04-04
3xLOGIC Infinias eIDC32 2.213 devices with Web 1.107 allow Authentication Bypass via CMD.HTM?CMD= because authentication depends on the client side's interpretation of the <KEY>MYKEY</KEY> substring.
CVE-2020-11533
PUBLISHED: 2020-04-04
Ivanti Workspace Control before 10.4.30.0, when SCCM integration is enabled, allows local users to obtain sensitive information (keying material).
CVE-2020-11529
PUBLISHED: 2020-04-04
Common/Grav.php in Grav before 1.6.23 has an Open Redirect.