Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Perimeter

8/1/2011
02:09 PM
Adrian Lane
Adrian Lane
Commentary
50%
50%

WAFs And SQL Injection

WAFs protect databases from SQL injection for only so long

The ModSecurity site is putting on the SQL Injection Challenge. Contestants are attempting to find successful SQL injection attacks against target applications. The four sample applications are from IBM, Cenzic, HP, and Acunetix, each with a slightly different host configuration and database platform.

There are two contests within the challenge. The first test is a timed event to see who can detect the database, table, and column names behind test applications. The second test is to find a vulnerability and avoid both inbound attacks and data extrusion detection. These applications have been previously scanned for common vulnerabilities and injection attacks, and there are active Web application firewalls running.

Remember that SQL injection is an attack on a database that goes through a firewall, an application, and, in some cases, a supporting Web application firewall as well. What's also important to note here is that these "test" applications are set up to be pretty secure.

The first phase of the event has been completed, and each of the platforms were successfully compromised. On average, it took 72 hours for an attacker to break in across the various contests and against each of the four applications. The test results demonstrate that a Web application firewall (WAF) will be breached by a persistent attacker. It's not a matter of if -- it's a matter of when. The real value of WAF technology is to monitor and detect attacks so you respond to the attack. That might mean updating your WAF rules, filtering some inbound connections, double-checking that input values are properly filtered, or even taking some of your services off line.

There are a few lessons to learn here, but paramount is that you need to be monitoring activity -- and actually reviewing the logs -- if you hope to catch and react to an attack. Static defenses only last so long.

Adrian Lane is an analyst/CTO with Securosis LLC, an independent security consulting practice. Special to Dark Reading. Adrian Lane is a Security Strategist and brings over 25 years of industry experience to the Securosis team, much of it at the executive level. Adrian specializes in database security, data security, and secure software development. With experience at Ingres, Oracle, and ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Commentary
Cyberattacks Are Tailored to Employees ... Why Isn't Security Training?
Tim Sadler, CEO and co-founder of Tessian,  6/17/2021
Edge-DRsplash-10-edge-articles
7 Powerful Cybersecurity Skills the Energy Sector Needs Most
Pam Baker, Contributing Writer,  6/22/2021
News
Microsoft Disrupts Large-Scale BEC Campaign Across Web Services
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  6/15/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
The State of Cybersecurity Incident Response
In this report learn how enterprises are building their incident response teams and processes, how they research potential compromises, how they respond to new breaches, and what tools and processes they use to remediate problems and improve their cyber defenses for the future.
Flash Poll
How Enterprises are Developing Secure Applications
How Enterprises are Developing Secure Applications
Recent breaches of third-party apps are driving many organizations to think harder about the security of their off-the-shelf software as they continue to move left in secure software development practices.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2021-35210
PUBLISHED: 2021-06-23
Contao 4.5.x through 4.9.x before 4.9.16, and 4.10.x through 4.11.x before 4.11.5, allows XSS. It is possible to inject code into the tl_log table that will be executed in the browser when the system log is called in the back end.
CVE-2021-27649
PUBLISHED: 2021-06-23
Use after free vulnerability in file transfer protocol component in Synology DiskStation Manager (DSM) before 6.2.3-25426-3 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via unspecified vectors.
CVE-2021-29084
PUBLISHED: 2021-06-23
Improper neutralization of special elements in output used by a downstream component ('Injection') vulnerability in Security Advisor report management component in Synology DiskStation Manager (DSM) before 6.2.3-25426-3 allows remote attackers to read arbitrary files via unspecified vectors.
CVE-2021-29085
PUBLISHED: 2021-06-23
Improper neutralization of special elements in output used by a downstream component ('Injection') vulnerability in file sharing management component in Synology DiskStation Manager (DSM) before 6.2.3-25426-3 allows remote attackers to read arbitrary files via unspecified vectors.
CVE-2021-29086
PUBLISHED: 2021-06-23
Exposure of sensitive information to an unauthorized actor vulnerability in webapi component in Synology DiskStation Manager (DSM) before 6.2.3-25426-3 allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information via unspecified vectors.