Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Endpoint

12/1/2009
02:40 PM
Connect Directly
Google+
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

US-CERT Warns Of VPN Attack That Bypasses Browser Security

SSL VPN products from Cisco, Juniper Networks, SafeNet, and SonicWALL all vulnerable to attack that has "no solution"

The US-CERT has issued an advisory on a vulnerability in SSL VPN products that breaks basic browser security features, letting an attacker bypass authentication steps and wage other Web-based attacks.

There's no known fix for the problem, according to the advisory, but US-CERT offers several workarounds to mitigate an attack that exploits the vulnerability. The advisory affects some SSL VPNs that allow browser-based -- rather than VPN client-based -- access to intranets and external Web resources. This type of Web-based VPN is typically used for internal Webmail server access, file shares, and remote desktop tools. Users connect to the VPN via their Web browser, which authenticates them to their VPN.

A user first has to be duped into viewing an attacker's infected Web page, where the attacker then can grab the user's VPN session tokens and read or alter the victim's cookies or HTML content. "This effectively eliminates the same origin policy restrictions in all browsers. For example, the attacker may be able to capture keystrokes while a user is interacting with a web page. Because all content runs at the privilege level of the web VPN domain, mechanisms to provide domain-based content restrictions, such as Internet Explorer security zones and the Firefox add-on NoScript, may be bypassed," the US-CERT advisory says.

Security experts say the actual threat to enterprises all depends on how they've configured their VPNs. "In the end the risk will be different for every organization, depending on the setup they're using. I actually think this is a time when the risk is broad enough that calling this serious or not is entirely opinion-based, as it needs to be judged on a case-by-case basis," says Tyler Reguly, lead security research engineer at nCircle. "This isn't really a vulnerability -- it's a weakness."

Robert Hansen, a.k.a. "RSnake," says stealing the victim's credentials and overwriting page content would be "trivial" if an attacker had access to one of the domains (think insider threat). "And if [the enterprise VPN] allows routing to the Internet, it doesn't have to be an insider. It can be any attacker anywhere that can dupe any SSL user into visiting a link, assuming they're using a vulnerable version," says Hansen, who conducted previous vulnerability research on VPNs.

US-CERT provided workarounds for the issue, which was based on research from Michal Zalewski and expanded on by researchers David Warren and Ryan Giobbi. The workarounds include:

1. Limit URL-rewriting to trusted domains: Only allow URLs to be rewritten for trusted, internal site. The VPN server should not allow access to other sites and domains.

2. Limit VPN server connections to trusted domains: Configure the VPN device to reach specific network domains. Firewall rules may also be applied for this.

3. Disable URL-hiding features: An attacker can abuse this to hide the actual destination of their links.

Have a comment on this story? Please click "Discuss" below. If you'd like to contact Dark Reading's editors directly, send us a message. Kelly Jackson Higgins is Executive Editor at DarkReading.com. She is an award-winning veteran technology and business journalist with more than two decades of experience in reporting and editing for various publications, including Network Computing, Secure Enterprise ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Microsoft Patches Wormable RCE Vulns in Remote Desktop Services
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  8/13/2019
The Mainframe Is Seeing a Resurgence. Is Security Keeping Pace?
Ray Overby, Co-Founder & President at Key Resources, Inc.,  8/15/2019
GitHub Named in Capital One Breach Lawsuit
Dark Reading Staff 8/14/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
7 Threats & Disruptive Forces Changing the Face of Cybersecurity
This Dark Reading Tech Digest gives an in-depth look at the biggest emerging threats and disruptive forces that are changing the face of cybersecurity today.
Flash Poll
The State of IT Operations and Cybersecurity Operations
The State of IT Operations and Cybersecurity Operations
Your enterprise's cyber risk may depend upon the relationship between the IT team and the security team. Heres some insight on what's working and what isn't in the data center.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-15113
PUBLISHED: 2019-08-16
The companion-sitemap-generator plugin before 3.7.0 for WordPress has CSRF.
CVE-2019-15114
PUBLISHED: 2019-08-16
The formcraft-form-builder plugin before 1.2.2 for WordPress has CSRF.
CVE-2019-15115
PUBLISHED: 2019-08-16
The peters-login-redirect plugin before 2.9.2 for WordPress has CSRF.
CVE-2019-15116
PUBLISHED: 2019-08-16
The easy-digital-downloads plugin before 2.9.16 for WordPress has XSS related to IP address logging.
CVE-2017-18547
PUBLISHED: 2019-08-16
The nelio-ab-testing plugin before 4.6.4 for WordPress has CSRF in experiment forms.