Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Risk

1/9/2014
10:35 PM
Connect Directly
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Top 5 IT Risk Management Resolutions For 2014

Priorities for improving risk management practices for better security in the coming year

As IT risk management and security professionals steel themselves for another year of high-profile breaches, increasingly sophisticated attacks and continued regulatory scrutiny on their controls, now may be the perfect time to re-examine risk management priorities. While every organization is unique, risk management pundits believe there are certain common initiatives that could stand more attention among many enterprises. The following five resolutions—listed in no particular order--are among the top ways that risk managers can take their practices to the next level in 2014.

Resolution #1: Improving Third-Party Risk Management
As news of more breaches and security incidents caused by third-parties make the news, enterprises and regulatory bodies alike are sharpening their focus on risks posed by vendors and partners entrusted with their data. According Andrew Wild, CSO of Qualys, he expects third-party risk management to be a key area of focus for IT risk professionals this year.

"The growing reliance upon third parties requires a mature third party risk management program to ensure risks are properly identified, assessed and managed," Wild says, pointing to new regulatory requirements such as the guidance issued for banking institutions by the U.S. Office of the Comptroller of the Currency. "However, even organizations with no regulatory or compliance program requirements for third party risk management face increased scrutiny from customers about third party risk management."

Resolution #2: Tune Risk Management For Greater Flexibility And Response
Targeted and stealthy attacks will continue to press security practitioners to change their methods to deal with them.

"The damage generated by those targeted attacks will be significant enough to drive further migration from static border protection and access control-based security programs, to dynamic programs that analyze new threats and risks on a daily basis and drive upgrades, updates and system changes," says Rich Dakin, chief security strategist for Coalfire.

This, of course, means that risk analysis needs to advance way beyond simple yearly risk assessments if risk managers are to make meaningful calculations that can drive decisions about IT infrastructure and processes. Not only should organizations be seeking better ways to feed real-time information into risk assessments, but they also should be seeking ways to more quickly adjust existing technology according to those assessments rather than simply trying to buy their way out of newly identified risks.

"Businesses often assume they need new controls to address subsequent risks, but often times they can adjust existing controls to address new risks," says Gerrit Lansing, director of consulting services for CyberArk Software.

Resolution #3: Use More Data To Assess Risks
Part of that push to a more evolved risk assessment involves better incorporation of data into the process. As important as questionnaires and the like may be to understanding processes and practices, data mined from security technologies and IT infrastructure are equally important to validate that the assumptions made when answering questions are truly valid.

"Many organizations do not utilize the facts and data that are present in their environment," says Amad Fida, CEO of Brinqa. "They miss the opportunity to analyze and correlate those responses with security data from their systems and controls they have in place."

[Are you getting the most out of your security data? See 8 Effective Data Visualization Methods For Security Teams.]

Resolution #4: Collaborate With Business Users For More Pervasive Risk Management
The security elite have long preached the need for better alignment between IT security practices and the business. That starts first with increased collaboration in the risk-management process between risk managers and business users both inside and outside the organization, says Yo Delmar, vice president for MetricStream.

"Essentially risk, compliance, and security functions will have inputs from the first line of defense business users, suppliers, franchisees, and so on," Delmar says, explaining that means providing a risk management platform that supports widespread useage for these users. "Risk management will increasingly be tied with performance management and will be available at the ‘point’ of action for business users. For example, if a company is working with high risk vendors, it will not be enough to just do an assessment of the vendor regularly, but rather systematically tie performance indicators and negotiations for renewals to that vendor risk assessment directly."

Resolution #5: Balance Preventative Controls With Detective Controls
More organizations should resolve themselves to improve the balance between preventative and detective controls, Wild says.

"In the past, many companies almost exclusively relied on preventative controls, which is not 100% effective," he explains. "Because of this, the use of detective controls to ensure security incidents that aren’t prevented can be discovered, contained and remediated."

At the end of the day, this balance should be driven by a solid risk management-based security framework.

Have a comment on this story? Please click "Add Your Comment" below. If you'd like to contact Dark Reading's editors directly, send us a message.

Ericka Chickowski specializes in coverage of information technology and business innovation. She has focused on information security for the better part of a decade and regularly writes about the security industry as a contributor to Dark Reading.  View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
SOC 2s & Third-Party Assessments: How to Prevent Them from Being Used in a Data Breach Lawsuit
Beth Burgin Waller, Chair, Cybersecurity & Data Privacy Practice , Woods Rogers PLC,  12/5/2019
Navigating Security in the Cloud
Diya Jolly, Chief Product Officer, Okta,  12/4/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win a Starbucks Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: "This is the last time we hire Game of Thrones Security"
Current Issue
Navigating the Deluge of Security Data
In this Tech Digest, Dark Reading shares the experiences of some top security practitioners as they navigate volumes of security data. We examine some examples of how enterprises can cull this data to find the clues they need.
Flash Poll
Rethinking Enterprise Data Defense
Rethinking Enterprise Data Defense
Frustrated with recurring intrusions and breaches, cybersecurity professionals are questioning some of the industrys conventional wisdom. Heres a look at what theyre thinking about.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-19230
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-09
An unsafe deserialization vulnerability exists in CA Release Automation (Nolio) 6.6 with the DataManagement component that can allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code.
CVE-2013-0342
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-09
The CreateID function in packet.py in pyrad before 2.1 uses sequential packet IDs, which makes it easier for remote attackers to spoof packets by predicting the next ID, a different vulnerability than CVE-2013-0294.
CVE-2014-0242
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-09
mod_wsgi module before 3.4 for Apache, when used in embedded mode, might allow remote attackers to obtain sensitive information via the Content-Type header which is generated from memory that may have been freed and then overwritten by a separate thread.
CVE-2015-3424
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-09
SQL injection vulnerability in Accentis Content Resource Management System before the October 2015 patch allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands via the SIDX parameter.
CVE-2015-3425
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-09
Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Accentis Content Resource Management System before October 2015 patch allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the ctl00$cph_content$_uig_formState parameter.