Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Perimeter

Third Parties Fumble Data Handoffs

Your company's data breach may result from a partner's mistakes

Companies are learning -- the hard way -- that the security chain is only as good as its weakest link.

In the past few days, two major organizations have suffered breaches of their constituents' personal data -- not because of something they did, but because of something their partners did.

The U.S. Marine Corps today reported that the personal information of some 10,000 leathernecks, including names and Social Security numbers, has been exposed to potential identity theft. The data was improperly posted on the Web by a university that was studying the Marines' marksmanship, the Corps said.

The announcement comes on the heels of a breach reported by St. Vincent hospital in Indianapolis, where the personal information of some 51,000 patients was exposed when a third-party technician made a mistake in updating one of the hospital's Internet servers.

Although the two breaches are very different, they both demonstrate that breaches can be caused by errors made outside the organization. As part of a study on the effects of live fire on marksmanship, the Marines gave researchers at Penn State University the rifle range requalification records of some 10,000 leathernecks who attended Marine Corps Recruit Depot at Parris Island, S.C., from January 2004 through December 2006.

According to a report in Marine Times, the data on 10,554 Marines was "improperly posted" to an Internet server and was cached by the Google search engine. The problem was discovered when one of the affected Marines Googled his own name and found the file on the Web.

Marines officials say Penn State has taken the data down, but that the information had been exposed "for 10 or 11 days."

St. Vincent, in its breach case, had subcontracted Verus Inc. to set up a program that would allow patients to pay bills online, according to a report by Channel 6 News in Indianapolis.

"The Verus technician made a change to the Internet server, which left some of our patient information online, unprotected," said Johnny Smith, a spokesman for St. Vincent. The data was exposed for a "brief time," and it is possible that no one accessed it, officials said.

Verus was also blamed in the breach of some 9,000 patient records at Concord Hospital in New Hampshire just last month, according to a report in The Concord Monitor.

— Tim Wilson, Site Editor, Dark Reading

Tim Wilson is Editor in Chief and co-founder of Dark Reading.com, UBM Tech's online community for information security professionals. He is responsible for managing the site, assigning and editing content, and writing breaking news stories. Wilson has been recognized as one ... View Full Bio

 

Recommended Reading:

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Oldest First  |  Newest First  |  Threaded View
COVID-19: Latest Security News & Commentary
Dark Reading Staff 8/10/2020
Researcher Finds New Office Macro Attacks for MacOS
Curtis Franklin Jr., Senior Editor at Dark Reading,  8/7/2020
Healthcare Industry Sees Respite From Attacks in First Half of 2020
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  8/13/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win an Amazon Gift Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: It's a technique known as breaking out of the sandbox kids.
Current Issue
Special Report: Computing's New Normal, a Dark Reading Perspective
This special report examines how IT security organizations have adapted to the "new normal" of computing and what the long-term effects will be. Read it and get a unique set of perspectives on issues ranging from new threats & vulnerabilities as a result of remote working to how enterprise security strategy will be affected long term.
Flash Poll
The Changing Face of Threat Intelligence
The Changing Face of Threat Intelligence
This special report takes a look at how enterprises are using threat intelligence, as well as emerging best practices for integrating threat intel into security operations and incident response. Download it today!
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-20383
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-13
ABBYY network license server in ABBYY FineReader 15 before Release 4 (aka 15.0.112.2130) allows escalation of privileges by local users via manipulations involving files and using symbolic links.
CVE-2020-24348
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-13
njs through 0.4.3, used in NGINX, has an out-of-bounds read in njs_json_stringify_iterator in njs_json.c.
CVE-2020-24349
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-13
njs through 0.4.3, used in NGINX, allows control-flow hijack in njs_value_property in njs_value.c. NOTE: the vendor considers the issue to be "fluff" in the NGINX use case because there is no remote attack surface.
CVE-2020-7360
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-13
An Uncontrolled Search Path Element (CWE-427) vulnerability in SmartControl version 4.3.15 and versions released before April 15, 2020 may allow an authenticated user to escalate privileges by placing a specially crafted DLL file in the search path. This issue was fixed in version 1.0.7, which was r...
CVE-2020-24342
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-13
Lua through 5.4.0 allows a stack redzone cross in luaO_pushvfstring because a protection mechanism wrongly calls luaD_callnoyield twice in a row.