Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Risk

10/16/2015
10:30 AM
Kevin Bocek
Kevin Bocek
Commentary
Connect Directly
Twitter
LinkedIn
Google+
Twitter
LinkedIn
Google+
RSS
E-Mail vvv
50%
50%

The Internet of Things: Its All About Trust

As billions of devices come online, it will be critical to protect the keys and certificates we use for authentication, validation, and privileged access control.

As technology becomes more interconnected with the Internet of Things, we should expect to see more insidious hacks like those demonstrated at Black Hat USA this past summer that will -- at some point in the near future -- strike close to home. It’s one thing when your company gets hacked and quite another when your pacemaker, commercial airline, or traffic light control and coordination system gets pwned because of security vulnerabilities in IoT devices.

What is the core of the problem?

There are two technologies that are foundational to enabling our world economy today. They are DNS and keys and certificates.  According to Gartner, there is an estimated 4.9 billion IoT devices connected to the Internet, a number that is estimated to grow to 25 billion devices by 2020. As was so clearly displayed in the GM RemoteLink app hack at Black Hat, at the core of IoT are keys and certificates; SSL/TLS validation, or the lack of validation, was exploited as part of the hack.

As billions of devices come online, it will become all the more critical to protect the keys and certificates that are used for authentication, validation, and privileged access control. For example, as the auto industry moves toward driverless cars, the cars themselves (as early as 2020) will be connected with other cars to gather and share critical information. At the heart of the connected vehicle communication are keys and certificates.

Automakers are expecting cars to be a high value target for hackers and have already begun to put security controls in place. One such control changes the certificates used for SSL/TLS communication between the cars at least 12 times per hour. Think what a PKI management nightmare that may be if you are not able to tell whether a certificate is good or bad, friend or foe?

One good example of identifying friend or foe is where researchers at DefCon demonstrated how they were able to hack a Tesla car. Tesla responded very quickly with a patch that was distributed over the air. Even though Tesla claims that the firmware update to correct the vulnerability was digitally signed, researchers who successfully pulled off the hack contend that it was not. This situation shows the gravity of the problem the security industry is facing as more “things” come online. In the Tesla case, how would the vehicle know a legitimate and safe firmware update from a malicious one? Obviously this is the job of code-signing certificates.

It’s not only the auto industry that needs to be concerned about IoT devices being compromised over the air. Hospitals using computerized pumps designed for the continuous delivery of general infusion therapy for thousands of patients have been strongly advised by the FDA to transition away from a particular type of infusion system that hackers can exploit via wired or wireless access to manipulate the patient dosage.

There are many other areas where connected devices are already significantly used. The hotel industry, for instance, is moving toward digital room key access that enables you to simply use your phone to access your room using a digital certificate. Imagine if attackers were able to fraudulently issue their own certificate to misrepresent you. Now we have a personal safety issue!

Industrial systems that make use of SCADA products use SSL/TLS to transfer critical information and receive commands from a central point of control. Attacks against SCADA systems are growing in popularity because many are still running legacy software that does not have security built in or has weak security, which is now Internet enabled. Last year, hackers found that SCADA devices responsible for energy, water and commercial facilities, mainly in the United States and Europe, were vulnerable to SSL decryption, enabling an attacker to capture sensitive information in plain text.

At the foundation of all SSL/TLS communication between all devices are keys and certificates and it’s becoming all the more difficult to distinguish which ones can be trusted and which ones cannot. Without the ability to tell friend vs. foe, good vs. bad in the digital realm, our global economy is in a perilous situation.

Black Hat Europe returns to the beautiful city of Amsterdam, Netherlands November 12 & 13, 2015. Click here for more information and to register.

Kevin Bocek is Vice President of Security Strategy and Threat Intelligence at cyber security firm Venafi. He is responsible for Venafi's product positioning, go-to-market strategy, and sales enablement. He brings more than 15 years of experience in encryption and key ... View Full Bio
Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Gebildete
50%
50%
Gebildete,
User Rank: Apprentice
10/28/2015 | 4:42:10 AM
Security
Devices' security was a problem for me as I started studying. I wanted to send photos, documents and videos per social networks, e-mail etc. For this objection I used konstruktor, dropbox, onedrive. Still I doubt if all the information is secured and is enable only for me. Moreover during the surfing on the Internet I keep my personal data. It is very important to know all the information I have on the Internet is available only for myself.
Florida Town Pays $600K to Ransomware Operators
Curtis Franklin Jr., Senior Editor at Dark Reading,  6/20/2019
Pledges to Not Pay Ransomware Hit Reality
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  6/21/2019
AWS CISO Talks Risk Reduction, Development, Recruitment
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  6/25/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
Building and Managing an IT Security Operations Program
As cyber threats grow, many organizations are building security operations centers (SOCs) to improve their defenses. In this Tech Digest you will learn tips on how to get the most out of a SOC in your organization - and what to do if you can't afford to build one.
Flash Poll
The State of IT Operations and Cybersecurity Operations
The State of IT Operations and Cybersecurity Operations
Your enterprise's cyber risk may depend upon the relationship between the IT team and the security team. Heres some insight on what's working and what isn't in the data center.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-1619
PUBLISHED: 2019-06-27
A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Data Center Network Manager (DCNM) could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to bypass authentication and execute arbitrary actions with administrative privileges on an affected device. The vulnerability is due to improper session ...
CVE-2019-1620
PUBLISHED: 2019-06-27
A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Data Center Network Manager (DCNM) could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to upload arbitrary files on an affected device. The vulnerability is due to incorrect permission settings in affected DCNM software. An attacker could ex...
CVE-2019-1621
PUBLISHED: 2019-06-27
A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Data Center Network Manager (DCNM) could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to gain access to sensitive files on an affected device. The vulnerability is due to incorrect permissions settings on affected DCNM software. An attacker...
CVE-2019-1622
PUBLISHED: 2019-06-27
A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Data Center Network Manager (DCNM) could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to retrieve sensitive information from an affected device. The vulnerability is due to improper access controls for certain URLs on affected DCNM software...
CVE-2019-10133
PUBLISHED: 2019-06-26
A flaw was found in Moodle before 3.7, 3.6.4, 3.5.6, 3.4.9 and 3.1.18. The form to upload cohorts contained a redirect field, which was not restricted to internal URLs.