Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.


Study: Most Federal Agencies Uncertain About Meeting FISMA Security Monitoring Deadlines

Only 22 percent of respondents say their agencies have deployed continuous monitoring technology

Federal government IT people are confused and uncertain about their agencies' abilities to meet federal guidelines for continuous monitoring of security posture, according to a study published today.

The RedSeal/Dimensional Research survey about FISMA continuous monitoring efforts indicates that more than half (55 percent) of federal IT professionals either don't believe their agencies will meet White House targets for implementing the technology or don't know whether they will meet them.

The deadline for continuous monitoring implementation originally was set for the end of fiscal 2011, which occurred in September. The deadline has since been extended to the end of fiscal 2012, but only 22 percent of respondents said their agencies have deployed the technology.

"Interestingly, the senior people that we surveyed -- the people who have the broadest view of the problem -- were the most pessimistic," says Mike Lloyd, CTO at RedSeal, which makes security monitoring tools. "The people who can see the whole picture are realizing how difficult continuous monitoring is and how much more is still to be done."

Most of the agencies represented in the survey -- which interviewed some 234 IT professionals at the recent GFIRST conference -- do not currently believe they have the tools necessary to meet the continuous monitoring deadlines or are unaware whether they do.

While the survey listed several different technologies that might be used for continuous monitoring, only one of them -- intrusion detection -- was cited as a solution by more than half of the respondents.

"What that says is that most of these people don't really know what technologies they're going to be using for continuous monitoring," Lloyd says. "There's no clear answer as to what tools will be used."

One of the problems with compliance could be the slushy deadlines and lack of strong penalties if agencies don't make the deadline, observers say.

"It’s extremely disappointing to see that even though the government issued these directives for continuous monitoring years ago, the people charged with implementation are not far enough along in acquiring or deploying the systems necessary to meet the requirements," says Major General John Casciano (USAF-Ret.), an adviser to RedSeal. "It might be time to take some people out behind the woodshed."

Have a comment on this story? Please click "Comment" below. If you'd like to contact Dark Reading's editors directly, send us a message. Tim Wilson is Editor in Chief and co-founder of Dark Reading.com, UBM Tech's online community for information security professionals. He is responsible for managing the site, assigning and editing content, and writing breaking news stories. Wilson has been recognized as one ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
COVID-19: Latest Security News & Commentary
Dark Reading Staff 4/7/2020
The Coronavirus & Cybersecurity: 3 Areas of Exploitation
Robert R. Ackerman Jr., Founder & Managing Director, Allegis Capital,  4/7/2020
'Unkillable' Android Malware App Continues to Infect Devices Worldwide
Jai Vijayan, Contributing Writer,  4/8/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win a Starbucks Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: Digitized COVID-19 Prevention
Current Issue
6 Emerging Cyber Threats That Enterprises Face in 2020
This Tech Digest gives an in-depth look at six emerging cyber threats that enterprises could face in 2020. Download your copy today!
Flash Poll
State of Cybersecurity Incident Response
State of Cybersecurity Incident Response
Data breaches and regulations have forced organizations to pay closer attention to the security incident response function. However, security leaders may be overestimating their ability to detect and respond to security incidents. Read this report to find out more.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
PUBLISHED: 2020-04-09
Some Dahua products have buffer overflow vulnerabilities. After the successful login of the legal account, the attacker sends a specific DDNS test command, which may cause the device to go down.
PUBLISHED: 2020-04-09
Some products of Dahua have Denial of Service vulnerabilities. After the successful login of the legal account, the attacker sends a specific log query command, which may cause the device to go down.
PUBLISHED: 2020-04-09
WebAccess/NMS (versions prior to 3.0.2) does not properly sanitize user input and may allow an attacker to inject system commands remotely.
PUBLISHED: 2020-04-09
There are multiple ways an unauthenticated attacker could perform SQL injection on WebAccess/NMS (versions prior to 3.0.2) to gain access to sensitive information.
PUBLISHED: 2020-04-09
An attacker could use a specially crafted URL to delete files outside the WebAccess/NMS's (versions prior to 3.0.2) control.