Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Endpoint

4/28/2010
03:55 PM
Connect Directly
Google+
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Storm Worm Reappears

Slightly revamped version of original malware used by the infamous Storm botnet being actively spammed -- and spreading

It's baaack: The bot code used in the infamous, massive Storm botnet that was taken down nearly two years ago is being used to build another spamming botnet. Researchers have reverse-engineered the tweaked version of the original Storm code, which so far has spread somewhere between 10,000 to 20,000 machines.

Researchers don't know for sure whether it's the same botnet gang that drove the original Storm and then its predecessor, Waledac -- both of which are no more -- but they have identified two-thirds of the same elements in this latest version as in the original Storm code version. Noticeably missing is Storm's trademark peer-to-peer component: This version is all HTTP-based rather than the hybrid P2P/HTTP approach in the old botnet, which at one point swelled to a half-million bots. Storm began to fade away in the fall of 2008 after researchers were able to successfully disrupt its operations on more than one occasion.

Waledac, which boasted 60,000 to 80,000 zombies, was downed in February by a sneak attack from a team from Microsoft, Shadowserver, the University of Washington, Symantec, and a group of researchers from Germany and Austria who had first infiltrated the botnet last year.

Joe Stewart, director of malware research for the counter threat unit at Secureworks and known for his previous research on Storm, says he believes another person or group has procured the code and stripped out the P2P element. "From everything we've seen, it looks like the original Storm crew moved to Waledac...so what strikes me is that they stripped out the P2P and sold the spam code to another group to build a more simplified botnet," Stewart says. The P2P feature had been targeted by researchers, which made it less appealing, he says.

"They don't have to have peer-to-peer to make this thing work. It seems they [wanted to] get some more value from this old code base," says Stewart, who has seen between 10,000 and 20,000 infected machines thus far. "This is definitely not the same botnet -- it's a new botnet using Storm's original code."

Steven Adair, a researcher with the Shadowserver Foundation who was one of the first to spot the recycled and made-over Storm malware earlier this month, says the similarity to the original malcode is striking. "The user agent is the same, and it had a weird typo in it [like the original Storm], which is how we found it," Adair says.

He passed the sample to the Honeynet Project, which reverse-engineered it and found other similarities in the code, including the same command protocol, which is made up of a two-phase handshake, according to researchers there. Felix Leder, one of the Honeynet researchers, noted that two-thirds of the functions in the malware were basically cut and pasted from the original code.

Leder says the file itself looks different, however. "It has some protection around the actual code -- a packer -- that looks different," he says.

And there are still several weaknesses in the protocol, he says. "We are really astonished that they didn't improve that but just reused the code. Either they don't learn from their previous mistakes or it has been a different group that doesn't understand the design but just took the code, or they just don't care," says Leder, who, along with Honeynet members Mark Schloesser and Tillmann Werner, is still studying the botnet.

And its core function, like Storm, is for spamming and distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) attacks. "And it's still being controlled using the same template format," Secureworks' Stewart notes.

Stewart and Shadowserver's Adair have separately seen just one visible command-and-control server for the botnet, which they say is likely a proxy masking the rest of the botnet infrastructure. "They are already getting templates and sending out spam," says Adair, who notes that this new botnet so far doesn't appear to be as robust as Storm.

Researchers at Computer Associates, meanwhile, have spotted the new Storm malware being bundled with a Trojan downloader, along with fake antivirus software, as well. CA says the so-called Win32/Pecoan variant has been pumping out a spam email campaign using fake pharmacy, male impotency, adult dating, and celebrity scandal message lures.

The botnet so far isn't sending the same brand of socially engineered email messages that were characteristic of Storm, which capitalized on the latest news and were sent out during holidays, Stewart says. "This one is sending very typical spam," he says.

Have a comment on this story? Please click "Discuss" below. If you'd like to contact Dark Reading's editors directly, send us a message.

Kelly Jackson Higgins is the Executive Editor of Dark Reading. She is an award-winning veteran technology and business journalist with more than two decades of experience in reporting and editing for various publications, including Network Computing, Secure Enterprise ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Mobile Banking Malware Up 50% in First Half of 2019
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  1/17/2020
Active Directory Needs an Update: Here's Why
Raz Rafaeli, CEO and Co-Founder at Secret Double Octopus,  1/16/2020
New Attack Campaigns Suggest Emotet Threat Is Far From Over
Jai Vijayan, Contributing Writer,  1/16/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
The Year in Security: 2019
This Tech Digest provides a wrap up and overview of the year's top cybersecurity news stories. It was a year of new twists on old threats, with fears of another WannaCry-type worm and of a possible botnet army of Wi-Fi routers. But 2019 also underscored the risk of firmware and trusted security tools harboring dangerous holes that cybercriminals and nation-state hackers could readily abuse. Read more.
Flash Poll
How Enterprises are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
How Enterprises are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
Organizations have invested in a sweeping array of security technologies to address challenges associated with the growing number of cybersecurity attacks. However, the complexity involved in managing these technologies is emerging as a major problem. Read this report to find out what your peers biggest security challenges are and the technologies they are using to address them.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-5216
PUBLISHED: 2020-01-23
In Secure Headers (RubyGem secure_headers), a directive injection vulnerability is present in versions before 3.9.0, 5.2.0, and 6.3.0. If user-supplied input was passed into append/override_content_security_policy_directives, a newline could be injected leading to limited header injection. Upon seei...
CVE-2020-5217
PUBLISHED: 2020-01-23
In Secure Headers (RubyGem secure_headers), a directive injection vulnerability is present in versions before 3.8.0, 5.1.0, and 6.2.0. If user-supplied input was passed into append/override_content_security_policy_directives, a semicolon could be injected leading to directive injection. This could b...
CVE-2020-5223
PUBLISHED: 2020-01-23
In PrivateBin versions 1.2.0 before 1.2.2, and 1.3.0 before 1.3.2, a persistent XSS attack is possible. Under certain conditions, a user provided attachment file name can inject HTML leading to a persistent Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The vulnerability has been fixed in PrivateBin v1.3...
CVE-2019-20399
PUBLISHED: 2020-01-23
A timing vulnerability in the Scalar::check_overflow function in Parity libsecp256k1-rs before 0.3.1 potentially allows an attacker to leak information via a side-channel attack.
CVE-2020-7915
PUBLISHED: 2020-01-22
An issue was discovered on Eaton 5P 850 devices. The Ubicacion SAI field allows XSS attacks by an administrator.