Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Perimeter

9/15/2009
03:27 PM
Connect Directly
Google+
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Smart Card Alliance: End-To-End Encryption Won't Stop Credit-Card Fraud

Industry association proposes contactless chip cards, says end-to-end encryption isn't enough

The Smart Card Alliance has taken a stand against pure end-to-end encryption as a way to protect credit-card transactions, publishing a position paper this week calling instead for contactless chip cards with dynamic cryptograms.

Merchants and payment processors are under pressure to make changes in how customer card data is protected in the wake of major data breaches over the past two years, such as that of Heartland Payment Systems, which have exposed millions of customer credit and debit cards. The electronic payment industry is considering the adoption of a new ANSI standard, and Heartland is pushing for it to embrace end-to-end encryption of cardholder data.

"End-to-end encryption is designed to protect static data. As long as the transaction data is static, this is another way of combating fraud," says Randy Vanderhoof, executive director of the Smart Card Alliance. But when card data is being entered into a point-of-sale system (POS), for instance, it's still at risk, he says.

"It's like putting a steel door on a grass hut," he says. "Fraudsters will find other ways to get at that static data before it gets there, with things like skimming [the card data] as it's entered into the point of sale system, or cloning cards that are lost or stolen."

The alliance, whose members include Bank of America, MasterCard, Visa, HID Global Corporation, and the State Department, argues in its position paper that contactless chip cards with dynamic cryptograms for each transaction are a better solution than end-to-end encryption.

And if the industry does decide to adopt end-to-end encryption, the alliance recommends the standard allow for "globally-interoperable secure payment transactions using chip card technology in the future," the paper says.

The Smart Card Alliance's Vanderhoof says his organization's proposal is different from pure chip and PIN technology. "We're not advocating that the U.S. needs to go all the way to a full chip and PIN implementation, but chips with dynamic data like contactless payment cards that are on the market today," he says.

He says the proposal basically builds on existing "express" payment card programs from Visa, MasterCard, and American Express that provide more convenient and faster payment than traditional cards. These express cards use contactless card technology.

"The U.S. could see a significant change in fraud by introducing more dynamic data versus magnetic stripe data," Vanderhoof says.

Have a comment on this story? Please click "Discuss" below. If you'd like to contact Dark Reading's editors directly, send us a message.

Kelly Jackson Higgins is Executive Editor at DarkReading.com. She is an award-winning veteran technology and business journalist with more than two decades of experience in reporting and editing for various publications, including Network Computing, Secure Enterprise ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Threaded  |  Newest First  |  Oldest First
GitHub Named in Capital One Breach Lawsuit
Dark Reading Staff 8/14/2019
The Mainframe Is Seeing a Resurgence. Is Security Keeping Pace?
Ray Overby, Co-Founder & President at Key Resources, Inc.,  8/15/2019
The Flaw in Vulnerability Management: It's Time to Get Real
Jim Souders, Chief Executive Officer at Adaptiva,  8/15/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
7 Threats & Disruptive Forces Changing the Face of Cybersecurity
This Dark Reading Tech Digest gives an in-depth look at the biggest emerging threats and disruptive forces that are changing the face of cybersecurity today.
Flash Poll
The State of IT Operations and Cybersecurity Operations
The State of IT Operations and Cybersecurity Operations
Your enterprise's cyber risk may depend upon the relationship between the IT team and the security team. Heres some insight on what's working and what isn't in the data center.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-5034
PUBLISHED: 2019-08-20
An exploitable information disclosure vulnerability exists in the Weave Legacy Pairing functionality of Nest Cam IQ Indoor version 4620002. A set of specially crafted weave packets can cause an out of bounds read, resulting in information disclosure. An attacker can send packets to trigger this vuln...
CVE-2019-5035
PUBLISHED: 2019-08-20
An exploitable information disclosure vulnerability exists in the Weave PASE pairing functionality of the Nest Cam IQ Indoor, version 4620002. A set of specially crafted weave packets can brute force a pairing code, resulting in greater Weave access and potentially full device control. An attacker c...
CVE-2019-5036
PUBLISHED: 2019-08-20
An exploitable denial-of-service vulnerability exists in the Weave error reporting functionality of the Nest Cam IQ Indoor, version 4620002. A specially crafted weave packets can cause an arbitrary Weave Exchange Session to close, resulting in a denial of service. An attacker can send a specially cr...
CVE-2019-8103
PUBLISHED: 2019-08-20
Adobe Acrobat and Reader versions, 2019.012.20035 and earlier, 2019.012.20035 and earlier, 2017.011.30142 and earlier, 2017.011.30143 and earlier, 2017.011.30142 and earlier, 2015.006.30497 and earlier, and 2015.006.30498 and earlier have an out-of-bounds read vulnerability. Successful exploitation ...
CVE-2019-8104
PUBLISHED: 2019-08-20
Adobe Acrobat and Reader versions, 2019.012.20035 and earlier, 2019.012.20035 and earlier, 2017.011.30142 and earlier, 2017.011.30143 and earlier, 2017.011.30142 and earlier, 2015.006.30497 and earlier, and 2015.006.30498 and earlier have an out-of-bounds read vulnerability. Successful exploitation ...