Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Risk

8/27/2019
11:00 AM
Dark Reading
Dark Reading
Products and Releases
50%
50%

Shared Assessments Brings New Module to Third Party Risk Management Framework

SANTA FE, N.M.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--The Shared Assessments Program, the member-driven leader in third party risk assurance, today announced an important new addition to its Third Party Risk Management (TPRM) Framework covering the subjects of periodic assessments and continuous monitoring. Periodic assessments and continuous monitoring lie at the heart of the “Trust, but Verify” model, uniformly recognized as the gold standard for vendor assessments. This new Framework module is available today to program members on the Shared Assessments web site (www.sharedassessments.org).

Topics explored include: Organizations globally are searching for ways to improve the efficiency of existing third party risk management programs while simultaneously enhancing effectiveness, and this module examines a number of emerging processes that can help meet those twin goals.

  • Virtual and Open House Assessments
  • Brokered Assessment Repositories
  • Assurance Portals
  • Collaborative Assessments
  • Assessment Load Leveling

The module explores the changing relationship between periodic assessments and continuous monitoring, and examines solutions to the problems organizations are reporting when implementing continuous monitoring programs focused on threat intelligence. It’s a “nuts and bolts” guide whether improving existing programs or planning TPRM processes from scratch.

Pre-release readers have been enthusiastic in their praise. “This is a great blueprint for anyone that is either building a TPRM program or someone that’s looking to assess if their existing TPRM program encompasses all the current thought leadership in third party risk,” said Paul Poh, Managing Partner, Radical Security.

“The guidance in this release is spot-on, especially given the evolving threat landscape and the reliance on third party service and hosting providers,” said Rocco Grillo, Managing Director Global Cyber Risk Service, Alverez & Marsal. He continued, “With the module’s focus on integrating continuous monitoring and incident management processes into legacy TPRM programs, it will propel organizations in their quest to achieve greater cybersecurity resiliency. The module provides solid guidance to mitigate the everyday issues and risks that imperil program efficacy.”

Commenting on the module’s depth in exploring periodic assessments and continuous monitoring, Pete Tannish, Director of Information Security, Small Business Financial Exchange (SBFE LLC), said, “This document is by far the most thorough I’ve ever seen. [It] gives the reader any and every option of what to consider in order to build a program based on cost and/or risk.”

To download a copy of the Shared Assessments TPRM Framework, go to https://sharedassessments.org/framework/.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Why Cyber-Risk Is a C-Suite Issue
Marc Wilczek, Digital Strategist & CIO Advisor,  11/12/2019
DevSecOps: The Answer to the Cloud Security Skills Gap
Lamont Orange, Chief Information Security Officer at Netskope,  11/15/2019
Unreasonable Security Best Practices vs. Good Risk Management
Jack Freund, Director, Risk Science at RiskLens,  11/13/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
Navigating the Deluge of Security Data
In this Tech Digest, Dark Reading shares the experiences of some top security practitioners as they navigate volumes of security data. We examine some examples of how enterprises can cull this data to find the clues they need.
Flash Poll
Rethinking Enterprise Data Defense
Rethinking Enterprise Data Defense
Frustrated with recurring intrusions and breaches, cybersecurity professionals are questioning some of the industrys conventional wisdom. Heres a look at what theyre thinking about.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-19040
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-17
KairosDB through 1.2.2 has XSS in view.html because of showErrorMessage in js/graph.js, as demonstrated by view.html?q= with a '"sampling":{"value":"<script>' substring.
CVE-2019-19041
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-17
An issue was discovered in Xorux Lpar2RRD 6.11 and Stor2RRD 2.61, as distributed in Xorux 2.41. They do not correctly verify the integrity of an upgrade package before processing it. As a result, official upgrade packages can be modified to inject an arbitrary Bash script that will be executed by th...
CVE-2019-19012
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-17
An integer overflow in the search_in_range function in regexec.c in Oniguruma 6.x before 6.9.4_rc2 leads to an out-of-bounds read, in which the offset of this read is under the control of an attacker. (This only affects the 32-bit compiled version). Remote attackers can cause a denial-of-service or ...
CVE-2019-19022
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-17
iTerm2 through 3.3.6 has potentially insufficient documentation about the presence of search history in com.googlecode.iterm2.plist, which might allow remote attackers to obtain sensitive information, as demonstrated by searching for the NoSyncSearchHistory string in .plist files within public Git r...
CVE-2019-19035
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-17
jhead 3.03 is affected by: heap-based buffer over-read. The impact is: Denial of service. The component is: ReadJpegSections and process_SOFn in jpgfile.c. The attack vector is: Open a specially crafted JPEG file.