Zuccarini has made a small fortune (millions annually) through buying Internet domain names and then redirecting unsuspecting consumers from legitimate to illegitimate sites. The crook purchased the rights to more than 5,000 sites, focusing on words that are close to well known brands, for instance he has sites for 15 variations of the popular childrenï¿¼s cartoon site, the cartoonnetwork.com, and 41 variations on the name of pop star Britney Spears. Surfers looking for those sites but making typographical mistakes would enter his empire and be bombarded with ads for products ranging from Internet gambling to pornography. In some cases, the legitimate Web sites that the consumers were attempting to access were also launched. Consequently, customers sometimes thought the series of ads came from those companies. In addition, it also was difficult, or impossible in some cases, for Web surfers to close the popup windows and escape the advertising deluge.
The FCC went to court to penalize Zuccariniï¿¼s practice, and a judge handed him a penalty of $1.8 million. Since this agency has no criminal prosecutory power, it worked with the United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York, which brought criminal charges against Zuccarini for his misleading use of domain names and possession of child pornography. In August 2003, he was sentenced to 30 months in prison and 36 months of supervised release.
After serving his time, Zuccarini immediately returned to his vocation, but instead of trafficking in pornography (an area that was easy to prosecute), he served up other sites. In December 2006, the FTC charged that Zuccarini violated a 2002 judicial order by redirecting consumers on the Internet, misrepresenting that his domain names were affiliated or associated with third parties, and participating in affiliate marketing programs. The agency also charged that the defendant did not comply with record-keeping and reporting requirements in the original order. Last week, a judge ruled in the FTCï¿¼s favor and ordered Zuccarini to pay a $164,000 judgment. The agency, which declined to divulge how much of the first penalty the cybercrook paid, is in contact with him now, and working out the payment terms of the latest judgment.
Does that sound like an appropriate punishment for a flimflam artist who diminishes consumersï¿¼ faith in the Internet, skirts existing laws, and chews up government law enforcement resources? It seems like a slap on the wrist; a more appropriate sentence would be stripping him of his ability to conduct any type of cyber business. Enough time and money has been wasted with this clownï¿¼s actions to warrant a stiffer penalty, so legitimate businesses can concentrate on serving their customers.
Do you know what sites are linked to misspellings of your companyï¿¼s name? How would you deal with a cyber criminal like Zuccarini? Do you think his latest sentence was appropriate?