Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.


04:09 PM
Connect Directly

RSA Reports Address Rise In Enterprise Adoption Of Consumer Technologies

Survey of IT and security pros shows most organizations giving end users more leeway and influence in social networking, gadgets

While the majority of IT and security leaders in enterprises believe end-user influence on the adoption of applications and devices is on the rise, few felt they have the proper security in place to handle the addition of these technologies, according to a new report.

RSA, the security division of EMC, today published two reports on the so-called consumerization of IT -- one from a survey it commissioned from IDG and another from the Security for Business Innovation Council (SBIC), which provides recommendations for managing this changing technology landscape.

Sam Curry, CTO for global marketing at RSA, says he was surprised at the high percentage of enterprises in the IDG survey that are embracing consumer-driven tools, such as smartphones, social networking, and iPads. "The big numbers were the first thing that leapt out at me," Curry says. "I had expected more resistance."

Among the IDG survey of about 400 IT and security professionals, 76 percent say they believe end users are increasingly having more influence in device and application purchase decisions in their organizations, more than 60 percent say users have a say in the types of smartphones that are procured, and 20 percent say they let users make the call on the brand. More than half say users get input on netbook purchases, and half say they give them a say in tablet computing decisions.

More than one-fourth of the respondents say their users are allowed to use their own PCs or mobile devices for work, and more than 80 percent permit social networking -- 62 percent of whom use it for business communication.

The catch: Only 11 percent are "very confident" that they have the proper security in place to lock down these consumer devices and apps. And 23 percent admitted having a serious breach occur due to a personal or consumer device on their corporate network.

Curry says it was surprising that even with nearly one-fourth of the organizations suffering security breaches due to these devices, they still supported the technologies. "They are still saying, 'We have to embrace this,'" he says.

Just more than 20 percent of the organizations say they had "thoroughly" assessed the risk of bringing these technologies in-house, while 40 percent say they hadn't calculated their risks at all. Another 38 percent say they had assessed the risks in some cases, but not all.

The SBIC report, meanwhile, recommends that IT security teams shift their thinking from one of command and control to more oversight and business enablement, and leverage users as tech-savvy resources in a two-way dialogue. Other tips: calculate the risks associated with user-driven IT, get up to speed on consumer tools, stay ahead of the curve in new trends, and work more closely with vendors.

"You have to frame the discussion on risk and reward," RSA's Curry says.

Have a comment on this story? Please click "Discuss" below. If you'd like to contact Dark Reading's editors directly, send us a message.

Kelly Jackson Higgins is the Executive Editor of Dark Reading. She is an award-winning veteran technology and business journalist with more than two decades of experience in reporting and editing for various publications, including Network Computing, Secure Enterprise ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Inside the Ransomware Campaigns Targeting Exchange Servers
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  4/2/2021
Beyond MITRE ATT&CK: The Case for a New Cyber Kill Chain
Rik Turner, Principal Analyst, Infrastructure Solutions, Omdia,  3/30/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Current Issue
2021 Top Enterprise IT Trends
We've identified the key trends that are poised to impact the IT landscape in 2021. Find out why they're important and how they will affect you today!
Flash Poll
How Enterprises are Developing Secure Applications
How Enterprises are Developing Secure Applications
Recent breaches of third-party apps are driving many organizations to think harder about the security of their off-the-shelf software as they continue to move left in secure software development practices.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
PUBLISHED: 2021-04-11
In the standard library in Rust before 1.2.0, BinaryHeap is not panic-safe. The binary heap is left in an inconsistent state when the comparison of generic elements inside sift_up or sift_down_range panics. This bug leads to a drop of zeroed memory as an arbitrary type, which can result in a memory ...
PUBLISHED: 2021-04-11
In the standard library in Rust before 1.49.0, String::retain() function has a panic safety problem. It allows creation of a non-UTF-8 Rust string when the provided closure panics. This bug could result in a memory safety violation when other string APIs assume that UTF-8 encoding is used on the sam...
PUBLISHED: 2021-04-11
In the standard library in Rust before 1.49.0, VecDeque::make_contiguous has a bug that pops the same element more than once under certain condition. This bug could result in a use-after-free or double free.
PUBLISHED: 2021-04-11
In the standard library in Rust before 1.50.0, read_to_end() does not validate the return value from Read in an unsafe context. This bug could lead to a buffer overflow.
PUBLISHED: 2021-04-11
In the standard library in Rust before 1.52.0, the Zip implementation has a panic safety issue. It calls __iterator_get_unchecked() more than once for the same index when the underlying iterator panics (in certain conditions). This bug could lead to a memory safety violation due to an unmet safety r...