Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Risk

5/2/2011
02:10 PM
Connect Directly
Google+
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Researchers Catch Targeted Attack On Popular Soccer Website

Goal.com hit with previously unknown malware kit, according to Armorize

A popular sports website late last week was spotted serving up malware in what researchers say appears to be a targeted attack and not part of a mass SQL injection campaign.

Wayne Huang, CTO and a researcher with Armorize Technologies, says he and his team spotted the drive-by download attack on the internationally popular www.goal.com soccer website between April 27 and April 28, which allowed the attackers to control the content on parts of the site. And this was no mass SQL injection attack, he says, but rather a very targeted one. Goals.com is ranked No. 379 on Alexa.

"We saw an attacker injecting code into the website and causing it to serve up malware [during that time frame]," Huang says. "We think that was just a test initially."

The attackers employed a lesser known malware kit called "g01pack" and appear to have installed a backdoor for wresting control of the site. "It went to malicious domains that we have not seen anywhere else yet. None of these domains were flagged by any AV product or by Google SafeBrowsing," he says. The team was not familiar with the malware kit, he says.

What's unclear is just how the attackers infected goals.com with the malicious iFrames, or what the attackers are after. "We don't know at this point ... the backdoor allows them to do a lot of things," Huang says.

Huang and his team also found a fake admin page for the toolkit that acts as a honeynet for researchers -- this lets the attackers study who is looking at their malicious domains. "This allowed the attacker to know someone linked back [to the domains'," he says.

"After we accessed the fake control panel, the injection was deleted from goal.com. We're still actively monitoring it, and it hasn't appeared again," Huang says.

The researchers alerted goals.com of their findings, but have not yet received a response.

Though the malware was injected on the site for a little more than 24 hours, all you had to do was visit the site during the time frame to get infected. "There definitely should be a lot of infections considering that they get around 23,000 visitors a day," Huang says.

What sets the goal.com hack apart is that it's a large website that was hit with a rare exploit pack that has a low detection rate -- only four of 41 AV products detected anything awry with the code, and it had multiple malicious URLs associated it with it, none of which had been blacklisted. "This means when they decide to activate it, the infection rate is going to be pretty high," Huang says.

Among the browser exploits used during the "test run" of the attack were CVE-2010-1423 (Java), CVE-2010-1885 (MS help center HCP), CVE-2009-0927 (PDF), and CVE-2006-0003 (MS MDAC), according to Armorize.

Armorize has posted a blog here with details about the malicious code as well as the infection logs.

Have a comment on this story? Please click "Add Your Comment" below. If you'd like to contact Dark Reading's editors directly, send us a message.

Kelly Jackson Higgins is the Executive Editor of Dark Reading. She is an award-winning veteran technology and business journalist with more than two decades of experience in reporting and editing for various publications, including Network Computing, Secure Enterprise ... View Full Bio

 

Recommended Reading:

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
COVID-19: Latest Security News & Commentary
Dark Reading Staff 5/28/2020
Stay-at-Home Orders Coincide With Massive DNS Surge
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  5/27/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win a Starbucks Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: This comment is waiting for review by our moderators.
Current Issue
How Cybersecurity Incident Response Programs Work (and Why Some Don't)
This Tech Digest takes a look at the vital role cybersecurity incident response (IR) plays in managing cyber-risk within organizations. Download the Tech Digest today to find out how well-planned IR programs can detect intrusions, contain breaches, and help an organization restore normal operations.
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-11844
PUBLISHED: 2020-05-29
There is an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability in Micro Focus Service Management Automation (SMA) product affecting version 2018.05 to 2020.02. The vulnerability could be exploited to provide unauthorized access to the Container Deployment Foundation.
CVE-2020-6937
PUBLISHED: 2020-05-29
A Denial of Service vulnerability in MuleSoft Mule CE/EE 3.8.x, 3.9.x, and 4.x released before April 7, 2020, could allow remote attackers to submit data which can lead to resource exhaustion.
CVE-2020-7648
PUBLISHED: 2020-05-29
All versions of snyk-broker before 4.72.2 are vulnerable to Arbitrary File Read. It allows arbitrary file reads for users who have access to Snyk's internal network by appending the URL with a fragment identifier and a whitelisted path e.g. `#package.json`
CVE-2020-7650
PUBLISHED: 2020-05-29
All versions of snyk-broker after 4.72.0 including and before 4.73.1 are vulnerable to Arbitrary File Read. It allows arbitrary file reads to users with access to Snyk's internal network of any files ending in the following extensions: yaml, yml or json.
CVE-2020-7654
PUBLISHED: 2020-05-29
All versions of snyk-broker before 4.73.1 are vulnerable to Information Exposure. It logs private keys if logging level is set to DEBUG.