Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Risk

1/10/2008
01:40 AM
Connect Directly
Google+
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Printers Could Be Vulnerable to Spam

'Cross-site printing' lets an attacker remotely print to an internal network and even send faxes

First there was cross-site scripting (XSS), then there was cross-site request forgery (CSRF). Now there's a new exploit in town: cross-site printing. A researcher has discovered a way to remotely hack printers using JavaScript.

Researcher Aaron Weaver has written a proof of concept of such an attack, which would occur when a user visits a malicious Website that contains the "bad" JavaScript. The attacker could then connect to a printer on the user's intranet and send data (think spam) to it.

Using JavaScript, an attacker can print from his Website to the victim's internal networked printer via an HTTP Post command, according to Weaver. It also lets an attacker send PostScript Commands to format the pages and send faxes in some cases.

Weaver uses CSRF to issue the PostScript commands over Port 9100 to print ASCII-based art he created, according to Jeremiah Grossman, CTO of WhiteHat Security in his blog post. Network printers typically receive print jobs via Port 9100.

"The end result is that by visiting a Web site on the Internet, you could end up sending printer spam to your printer without even knowing that anything happened," Weaver writes in his paper about the hack. "Since most printers don’t have any security set, it is possible to print anything, control the printer, change the print settings and even send faxes."

How do you protect your printer from such an attack? For starters, Weaver says to make sure it has an administrative password. Then consider restricting access each printer, so that it can only execute jobs sent from a centralized print server.

— Kelly Jackson Higgins, Senior Editor, Dark Reading

  • WhiteHat Security

    Kelly Jackson Higgins is the Executive Editor of Dark Reading. She is an award-winning veteran technology and business journalist with more than two decades of experience in reporting and editing for various publications, including Network Computing, Secure Enterprise ... View Full Bio
     

    Recommended Reading:

    Comment  | 
    Print  | 
    More Insights
  • Comments
    Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
    COVID-19: Latest Security News & Commentary
    Dark Reading Staff 6/5/2020
    Abandoned Apps May Pose Security Risk to Mobile Devices
    Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  5/29/2020
    How AI and Automation Can Help Bridge the Cybersecurity Talent Gap
    Peter Barker, Chief Product Officer at ForgeRock,  6/1/2020
    Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
    White Papers
    Video
    Cartoon Contest
    Write a Caption, Win a Starbucks Card! Click Here
    Latest Comment: What? IT said I needed virus protection!
    Current Issue
    How Cybersecurity Incident Response Programs Work (and Why Some Don't)
    This Tech Digest takes a look at the vital role cybersecurity incident response (IR) plays in managing cyber-risk within organizations. Download the Tech Digest today to find out how well-planned IR programs can detect intrusions, contain breaches, and help an organization restore normal operations.
    Flash Poll
    Twitter Feed
    Dark Reading - Bug Report
    Bug Report
    Enterprise Vulnerabilities
    From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
    CVE-2020-13842
    PUBLISHED: 2020-06-05
    An issue was discovered on LG mobile devices with Android OS 7.2, 8.0, 8.1, 9, and 10 (MTK chipsets). A dangerous AT command was made available even though it is unused. The LG ID is LVE-SMP-200010 (June 2020).
    CVE-2020-13843
    PUBLISHED: 2020-06-05
    An issue was discovered on LG mobile devices with Android OS software before 2020-06-01. Local users can cause a denial of service because checking of the userdata partition is mishandled. The LG ID is LVE-SMP-200014 (June 2020).
    CVE-2020-13839
    PUBLISHED: 2020-06-05
    An issue was discovered on LG mobile devices with Android OS 7.2, 8.0, 8.1, 9, and 10 (MTK chipsets). Code execution can occur via a custom AT command handler buffer overflow. The LG ID is LVE-SMP-200007 (June 2020).
    CVE-2020-13840
    PUBLISHED: 2020-06-05
    An issue was discovered on LG mobile devices with Android OS 7.2, 8.0, 8.1, 9, and 10 (MTK chipsets). Code execution can occur via an MTK AT command handler buffer overflow. The LG ID is LVE-SMP-200008 (June 2020).
    CVE-2020-13841
    PUBLISHED: 2020-06-05
    An issue was discovered on LG mobile devices with Android OS 9 and 10 (MTK chipsets). An AT command handler allows attackers to bypass intended access restrictions. The LG ID is LVE-SMP-200009 (June 2020).