In fact, there is an important aspect of compliance that many organizations miss: Does the vendor even understand its compliance requirements?
Before embarking on a detailed assessment of an organization’s compliance and security programs, all organizations considering consuming a service that would be involved in protecting regulated information should ask the vendor whether it recognizes its responsibilities.
It is often surprising to find that service providers that manage protected health information, personal identifying information, and payment card information have no idea what controls what they should have in place. Equally surprising is the fact that consumers of the service have the false impression that the vendor is completely aware of its protection “responsibilities” and has accepted them.
Organizations entrusted with protected information are responsible for the practices of their vendors. Normally, vendors are contractually responsible for protecting the information. In poorly managed relationships, however, the consuming organization doesn’t make the requirement clear and allows the vendor to either be ignorant of the presence of protected information or believe that detailed understanding of regulatory requirements isn’t important.
Service consumers should be aware of an important point: You cannot force a vendor to comply with a regulation it doesn’t understand or hasn’t acknowledged by contract. It is for this reason that data protection regulations require contracts between data owners and service providers. All entities need to understand their requirements.
Once this understanding is established, the service consumer can assess whether the compliance program and security controls will meet its requirements.
In my next post, I’ll describe different methods for assessing partner practices, and the pros and cons of each.
Richard Mackey is vice president of consulting at SystemExperts Corp.