Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Perimeter

On Determining Online Identities

Detecting Online User Identities

Recently, there is a lot of discussion and arguments over the use of online activities to detect user identities. One of the common discussion points today is how Facebook detects the user not just by the user name and password they enter, but also by matching that user with their known activities, circle of friends and so on. Other similar activities are done by Google (street identity) ad others.

The advantages of these approaches are that they provide a stronger tie between the sign-on process and the actual known user who owns that particular account. This will help reduce the effect of phishing and stolen credentials, which end up in identity theft and other fraud. In the credit card industry, the associations have been promoting technologies labeled “3D secure” to provide additional identity verification when a credit card is entered in an online transaction.

There are some possible disadvantages for these approaches that are centered around the possible loss of private information that the sites collect and use to determine the online identity of a user. Indeed, if these data elements are protected properly, the loss of privacy could be severe. However, the power of improving the strength of the tie between a user and a session that the user initiated is a much stronger continuous authentication process around online sessions.

Examples in the credit card transaction industry are also in progress. IdentityMind is spearheading a new direction that ties the actual user who is known to own a credit card to the transaction, rather depend on machine IDs, which have been used or years with only marginal improvement in the fraud rates.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
//Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Edge-DRsplash-10-edge-articles
I Smell a RAT! New Cybersecurity Threats for the Crypto Industry
David Trepp, Partner, IT Assurance with accounting and advisory firm BPM LLP,  7/9/2021
News
Attacks on Kaseya Servers Led to Ransomware in Less Than 2 Hours
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  7/7/2021
Commentary
It's in the Game (but It Shouldn't Be)
Tal Memran, Cybersecurity Expert, CYE,  7/9/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
Incorporating a Prevention Mindset into Threat Detection and Response
Threat detection and response systems, by definition, are reactive because they have to wait for damage to be done before finding the attack. With a prevention-mindset, security teams can proactively anticipate the attacker's next move, rather than reacting to specific threats or trying to detect the latest techniques in real-time. The report covers areas enterprises should focus on: What positive response looks like. Improving security hygiene. Combining preventive actions with red team efforts.
Flash Poll
How Enterprises are Developing Secure Applications
How Enterprises are Developing Secure Applications
Recent breaches of third-party apps are driving many organizations to think harder about the security of their off-the-shelf software as they continue to move left in secure software development practices.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2022-26738
PUBLISHED: 2022-05-26
An out-of-bounds write issue was addressed with improved bounds checking. This issue is fixed in tvOS 15.5, macOS Monterey 12.4, iOS 15.5 and iPadOS 15.5. An application may be able to execute arbitrary code with kernel privileges.
CVE-2022-26702
PUBLISHED: 2022-05-26
A use after free issue was addressed with improved memory management. This issue is fixed in watchOS 8.6, tvOS 15.5, iOS 15.5 and iPadOS 15.5. An application may be able to execute arbitrary code with kernel privileges.
CVE-2022-26703
PUBLISHED: 2022-05-26
An authorization issue was addressed with improved state management. This issue is fixed in iOS 15.5 and iPadOS 15.5. A person with physical access to an iOS device may be able to access photos from the lock screen.
CVE-2022-26704
PUBLISHED: 2022-05-26
A validation issue existed in the handling of symlinks and was addressed with improved validation of symlinks. This issue is fixed in macOS Monterey 12.4. An app may be able to gain elevated privileges.
CVE-2022-26706
PUBLISHED: 2022-05-26
An access issue was addressed with additional sandbox restrictions on third-party applications. This issue is fixed in tvOS 15.5, iOS 15.5 and iPadOS 15.5, watchOS 8.6, macOS Big Sur 11.6.6, macOS Monterey 12.4. A sandboxed process may be able to circumvent sandbox restrictions.