Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Risk

12/17/2007
02:19 AM
Connect Directly
Google+
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

New Service Detects Backdoors in Software

Veracode identifies different types of these hidden programs in applications, adds a 'metal detector' for detecting them

Here's something else to keep you up at night: Most of today's scanning tools can't detect software backdoor programs that can be inserted during the development process.

Researchers at Veracode have identified several different forms of these backdoor programs, which are sometimes inserted purposely by the developer for debugging reasons and can inadvertently put the app at risk -- as well as those that can be easily sneaked into applications by malicious coders or attackers.

Fortify Software researchers dub the malicious form of this threat as "cross-build injection" -- where vulnerabilities and malware such as backdoors are tucked into code during the software development process. (See Hackers Attack Apps While Still in Development and Another 'Cross' to Bear.)

Veracode today also announced that it has added new features to its SecurityReview application security scanning service that detect some of these backdoor programs, which can sit quietly and invisibly in an application without your knowledge, leaving the door unlocked for an attacker to take over your machines.

"People doing manual code review look for vulnerabilities, but not typically for backdoors," says Chris Wysopal, CTO and co-founder of Veracode. "We built a metal detector for this."

Wysopal says several of Veracode's financial services customers had approached the company with concerns about this potential threat in the third-party software products they purchase and that their developers write. "They said: 'I'd like to have a solution for finding backdoors... I know I can't 100 percent trust my own developers to find them.'"

But it's not just the financial industry that may be at risk. In a recent report by the Defense Science Board on the risks of the Department of Defense's dependence on software manufactured outside of the U.S., the DSB discusses the need for assuring the software purchased by the DOD isn't sabotaged in any way. (The DSB is a federal advisory committee to the DOD.)

"The low-hanging fruit to exploit the DOD's infrastructure is switching from finding a vulnerability in software and exploiting it... to what if someone subverts the development team in the software supply chain and puts in malicious code we don't know about," Veracode's Wysopal says.

Wysopal says a researcher at a recent Department of Homeland Security software assurance conference spoke about a study he did on downloaded software risks. He found that 23 software packages that government employees might download for tools or for developing apps for their agencies, had backdoors within them. "That's a startlingly high number," Wysopal says. "The only solution has been to read through the source code and do a manual code review. Static analysis tools don't scan for backdoors."

Veracode's new scanning features are based on its static binary-analysis technology, and is at no extra charge for Veracode's customers. The service now scans for special credential backdoors, hidden functionality backdoors, and rootkits. Special credential backdoors are when a developer or attacker hard-codes passwords or keys into the program code, including username and password, for instance. Developers sometimes do so for debugging or customer support, but if this code is found or known by an attacker, it's the key to the kingdom.

Hidden functionality backdoors are special commands inserted into the code that lets an attacker issue commands or authenticate without going through the app's standard application procedure. This is becoming a popular feature on Web-based platforms, according to Veracode's research.

One third of the backdoors Veracode detected in its research were inserted by the developer rather than attackers. Still, that's a dangerous practice, Wysopal says: "I don't care if a feature was put in on purpose by the developer for debugging, or maliciously by an attacker. In both cases, the threat is equivalent."

Rootkit backdoors, meanwhile, are programs aimed at hiding activity on a system from the system administrator. "The big tell-tale sign of a rootkit is the software is doing something it's not supposed to do," Wyospal says.

Wysopal says Veracode hasn't seen any major exploits using these backdoor programs as yet. "But it's hard to understand why you would put in a backdoor unless you intended to use it at some point," he says. And the danger is that the software will appear to be behaving and functioning normally: "No IDS is going to go off. It's extremely hard to detect when there's a backdoor."

Next for Veracode: scanning for backdoors that perform what it calls unintended network activity as well as ones that manipulate security parameters, such as user privileges.

Have a comment on this story? Please click "Discuss" below. If you'd like to contact Dark Reading's editors directly, send us a message.

  • Veracode
  • Fortify Software Inc.

    Kelly Jackson Higgins is the Executive Editor of Dark Reading. She is an award-winning veteran technology and business journalist with more than two decades of experience in reporting and editing for various publications, including Network Computing, Secure Enterprise ... View Full Bio

    Comment  | 
    Print  | 
    More Insights
  • Comments
    Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
    Zero-Factor Authentication: Owning Our Data
    Nick Selby, Chief Security Officer at Paxos Trust Company,  2/19/2020
    44% of Security Threats Start in the Cloud
    Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  2/19/2020
    Firms Improve Threat Detection but Face Increasingly Disruptive Attacks
    Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  2/20/2020
    Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
    White Papers
    Video
    Cartoon
    Current Issue
    6 Emerging Cyber Threats That Enterprises Face in 2020
    This Tech Digest gives an in-depth look at six emerging cyber threats that enterprises could face in 2020. Download your copy today!
    Flash Poll
    How Enterprises Are Developing and Maintaining Secure Applications
    How Enterprises Are Developing and Maintaining Secure Applications
    The concept of application security is well known, but application security testing and remediation processes remain unbalanced. Most organizations are confident in their approach to AppSec, although others seem to have no approach at all. Read this report to find out more.
    Twitter Feed
    Dark Reading - Bug Report
    Bug Report
    Enterprise Vulnerabilities
    From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
    CVE-2020-9342
    PUBLISHED: 2020-02-22
    The F-Secure AV parsing engine before 2020-02-05 allows virus-detection bypass via crafted Compression Method data in a GZIP archive. This affects versions before 17.0.605.474 (on Linux) of Cloud Protection For Salesforce, Email and Server Security, and Internet GateKeeper.
    CVE-2020-9338
    PUBLISHED: 2020-02-22
    SOPlanning 1.45 allows XSS via the "Your SoPlanning url" field.
    CVE-2020-9339
    PUBLISHED: 2020-02-22
    SOPlanning 1.45 allows XSS via the Name or Comment to status.php.
    CVE-2020-9340
    PUBLISHED: 2020-02-22
    fauzantrif eLection 2.0 has SQL Injection via the admin/ajax/op_kandidat.php id parameter.
    CVE-2020-9341
    PUBLISHED: 2020-02-22
    CandidATS 2.1.0 is vulnerable to CSRF that allows for an administrator account to be added via the index.php?m=settings&a=addUser URI.