Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Endpoint

3/17/2010
05:23 PM
Connect Directly
Google+
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

New Free Service Filters Twitter Spam

Spamdetector sniffs out spammer accounts, which Twitter then deletes

Researchers recently launched a free spam-filtering service for Twitter that flags offenders for the microblogging service, which, in turn, removes the offending accounts.

The Spamdetector service crawls Twitter, using heuristics to detect spam accounts. Gianluca Stringhini, the researcher heading up the service, says the tool has a low false-positive rate.

"Around a year ago, we started observing these [social] networks, looking for malicious traffic...spammers show a very different behavior compared to real users, and therefore we were able to build a system that can detect them in a reliable way," says Stringhini, a researcher at the University of California-Santa Barbara.

Twitter already offers its users a button for reporting possible spam, but it relies on the user to spot suspicious tweets. The social network last week also added a new service that detects malicious URLs in an effort to quell the rise in spam and phishing on the network. It ultimately will scan all URLs before they hit the Twitter feed, but initially is doing so only for URLs sent via Twitter direct messages [DMs] and email notifications about DMs.

To be sure, abuse on Twitter is on the rise: One in eight Twitter accounts was found to be suspicious, malicious, or suspended last year, according to a recent report from Barracuda Networks. And Twitter itself currently finds 3 to 4 percent of accounts to be malicious, according to Barracuda's data.

Spamdetector also takes potential spam submissions from users who want to check if a tweet is legitimate. "Our system crawls Twitter on its own, and the spam detection happens mostly without users' submissions. We ask users to flag spammers to us because, in this way, we can target the crawling to certain accounts -- for instance, those sending tweets that have been detected as spammers -- allowing us to detect more spammers in a shorter period of time," Stringhini says. "When we detect spammers, we flag them to Twitter, which then takes care of deleting them."

Spamdetector profiles spammers based on features that are common in spammer accounts. "For example, spammers usually follow a large number of profiles, but are followed back only by a small fraction of them. They also usually send out very similar messages," Stringhini says. "We calculate some ratios related to the defined features for each account and flag as spammers those profiles that exceed a certain amount of thresholds in those ratios."

David Maynor, CTO of Errata Security, which runs an experimental service for detecting Twitter spam and threats called TwiGUARD, says spam has grown 3 percent since TwiGUARD first launched in September.

TwiGUARD was one of the first security tools for Twitter. It uses a reputation-based algorithm to see if a follower is a spammer or if a link is infected. The service also analyzes malware found via tweets. Maynor says Errata could eventually offer TwiGUARD as a full-blown service. "We're fine-tuning the algorithms for developing a user-friendly front-end to it," he says.

UC-Santa Barbara's Stringhini, meanwhile, says Twitter is actively fighting spam and malicious accounts on its network. "It is not easy to detect malicious accounts among millions of users. Moreover, Twitter is peculiar because many legitimate accounts are managed in an automated fashion, [such as] profiles of shops and posting deals, and this might lead to a wrong detection," he says. But Twitter is having some success on its own -- some have already been suspended when Spamdetector has flagged them, for example, he says.

As of Tuesday, the new service had detected -- and removed -- nearly 3,400 spam bot accounts in about a month.

To get the Spamdetector services, just follow @spamdetector on Twitter.

Have a comment on this story? Please click "Discuss" below. If you'd like to contact Dark Reading's editors directly, send us a message. Kelly Jackson Higgins is Executive Editor at DarkReading.com. She is an award-winning veteran technology and business journalist with more than two decades of experience in reporting and editing for various publications, including Network Computing, Secure Enterprise ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
RDP Bug Takes New Approach to Host Compromise
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  7/18/2019
The Problem with Proprietary Testing: NSS Labs vs. CrowdStrike
Brian Monkman, Executive Director at NetSecOPEN,  7/19/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
Building and Managing an IT Security Operations Program
As cyber threats grow, many organizations are building security operations centers (SOCs) to improve their defenses. In this Tech Digest you will learn tips on how to get the most out of a SOC in your organization - and what to do if you can't afford to build one.
Flash Poll
The State of IT Operations and Cybersecurity Operations
The State of IT Operations and Cybersecurity Operations
Your enterprise's cyber risk may depend upon the relationship between the IT team and the security team. Heres some insight on what's working and what isn't in the data center.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-10101
PUBLISHED: 2019-07-23
ServiceStack ServiceStack Framework 4.5.14 is affected by: Cross Site Scripting (XSS). The impact is: JavaScrpit is reflected in the server response, hence executed by the browser. The component is: the query used in the GET request is prone. The attack vector is: Since there is no server-side valid...
CVE-2019-10102
PUBLISHED: 2019-07-23
Voice Builder Prior to commit c145d4604df67e6fc625992412eef0bf9a85e26b and f6660e6d8f0d1d931359d591dbdec580fef36d36 is affected by: CWE-78: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection'). The impact is: Remote code execution with the same privileges as the...
CVE-2019-10102
PUBLISHED: 2019-07-23
Jeesite 1.2.7 is affected by: SQL Injection. The impact is: sensitive information disclosure. The component is: updateProcInsIdByBusinessId() function in src/main/java/com.thinkgem.jeesite/modules/act/ActDao.java has SQL Injection vulnerability. The attack vector is: network connectivity,authenticat...
CVE-2018-18670
PUBLISHED: 2019-07-23
GNUBOARD5 5.3.1.9 has XSS that allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the "Extra Contents" parameter, aka the adm/config_form_update.php cf_1~10 parameter.
CVE-2018-18672
PUBLISHED: 2019-07-23
GNUBOARD5 5.3.1.9 has XSS that allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the "board head contents" parameter, aka the adm/board_form_update.php bo_content_head parameter.