Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Risk

Most Websites Have Serious Vulnerabilities To Attack, Study Says

Large sites have an average of 13 serious vulnerabilities; smaller sites have slightly fewer

Ever wonder how likely it is that your website could be hacked? A research firm issued a report today that might offer some insight -- and the news isn't good.

According to a study published by WhiteHat Security, the average website has 13 "serious" vulnerabilities -- vulnerabilities that would be given high, critical, or urgent severity in a Payment Card Industry (PCI) audit.

Some of the other key findings in the study:

  • The banking, insurance, and healthcare industries performed the best overall, with an average of five, six, and eight vulnerabilities, respectively. The worst were the IT, retail, and education sectors, with averages of 24, 17, and 17.

  • Large organizations (more than 2,500 employees) had the highest average number of serious vulnerabilities, totaling 13, followed by midsize (150 to- 2,500 employees) at 12, and small (up to 150 employees) at 11.

  • Since last year's report, cross-site request forgery has moved up to fourth place as one of the most prevalent vulnerability classes. A new vulnerability, brute force, moved into tenth place, affecting 10 percent of websites.

  • Industries with a greater average number of serious vulnerabilities tend to have worse remediation rates. Small organizations fix the most of their serious vulnerabilities by percentage (62 percent), followed by midsize (58%), and large (54%).

    It does not appear organization size significantly impacts an industry's average number of serious vulnerabilities, the type or degree of specific vulnerability classes, or their time-to-fix metrics, according to the report. However, remediation rate does seem to correlate. Typically, the larger the organization, the fewer vulnerabilities they resolve by percentage.

    The telecommunications, retail, and healthcare industries had the three best remediation rates of large organizations, with 67 percent, 60 percent, and 58 percent, respectively. The three worst were IT, banking, and insurance with 32 percent, 35 percent, and 35 percent.

    Have a comment on this story? Please click "Discuss" below. If you'd like to contact Dark Reading's editors directly, send us a message. Tim Wilson is Editor in Chief and co-founder of Dark Reading.com, UBM Tech's online community for information security professionals. He is responsible for managing the site, assigning and editing content, and writing breaking news stories. Wilson has been recognized as one ... View Full Bio

    Comment  | 
    Print  | 
    More Insights
  • Comments
    Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
    97% of Americans Can't Ace a Basic Security Test
    Steve Zurier, Contributing Writer,  5/20/2019
    How Security Vendors Can Address the Cybersecurity Talent Shortage
    Rob Rashotte, VP of Global Training and Technical Field Enablement at Fortinet,  5/24/2019
    TeamViewer Admits Breach from 2016
    Dark Reading Staff 5/20/2019
    Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
    White Papers
    Video
    Cartoon Contest
    Current Issue
    Building and Managing an IT Security Operations Program
    As cyber threats grow, many organizations are building security operations centers (SOCs) to improve their defenses. In this Tech Digest you will learn tips on how to get the most out of a SOC in your organization - and what to do if you can't afford to build one.
    Flash Poll
    Twitter Feed
    Dark Reading - Bug Report
    Bug Report
    Enterprise Vulnerabilities
    From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
    CVE-2019-7068
    PUBLISHED: 2019-05-24
    Adobe Acrobat and Reader versions 2019.010.20069 and earlier, 2019.010.20069 and earlier, 2017.011.30113 and earlier version, and 2015.006.30464 and earlier have an use after free vulnerability. Successful exploitation could lead to arbitrary code execution .
    CVE-2019-7069
    PUBLISHED: 2019-05-24
    Adobe Acrobat and Reader versions 2019.010.20069 and earlier, 2019.010.20069 and earlier, 2017.011.30113 and earlier version, and 2015.006.30464 and earlier have a type confusion vulnerability. Successful exploitation could lead to arbitrary code execution .
    CVE-2019-7070
    PUBLISHED: 2019-05-24
    Adobe Acrobat and Reader versions 2019.010.20069 and earlier, 2019.010.20069 and earlier, 2017.011.30113 and earlier version, and 2015.006.30464 and earlier have an use after free vulnerability. Successful exploitation could lead to arbitrary code execution .
    CVE-2019-7071
    PUBLISHED: 2019-05-24
    Adobe Acrobat and Reader versions 2019.010.20069 and earlier, 2019.010.20069 and earlier, 2017.011.30113 and earlier version, and 2015.006.30464 and earlier have an out-of-bounds read vulnerability. Successful exploitation could lead to information disclosure.
    CVE-2019-7072
    PUBLISHED: 2019-05-24
    Adobe Acrobat and Reader versions 2019.010.20069 and earlier, 2019.010.20069 and earlier, 2017.011.30113 and earlier version, and 2015.006.30464 and earlier have an use after free vulnerability. Successful exploitation could lead to arbitrary code execution .