Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Risk

9/10/2015
04:35 PM
Connect Directly
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

MIT, Cambridge, Other Universities Get D's In Internet Security

Colleges -- especially large, high-profile institutions -- are facing more cybercrime and nation-state activity.

Final exams aren't for a few months, but several big-name universities already have received low marks from a threat intelligence and risk awareness provider on their overall security posture on the Internet.

SecurityScorecard, which uses a network of Internet sensors and tools to benchmark the security posture of organizations, today published its first-ever Higher Education Security Report on some nearly 500 universities, and surprisingly, the tech-savvy Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) earned the lowest score, a 61%. Next-worst on the list in order were New Mexico State University, Cambridge University, Temple University, University of Virginia, University of Southern California, Boston University, University of California-Riverside, Louisiana State University, and University of Georgia.

In the number one slot of the top 10 Colleges with the best security posture -- an A grade with 97% or higher -- was a community college, Merced Community College in California, with a 98.7% score, followed by Concordia College, Adams State University, Centre College, Henry Ford Community College, University of North Alabama, Golden Gate University, University of Idaho, Gannon University, and Pepperdine University.

SecurityScorecard studied universities with 1,000 or more public IP addresses and graded their security posture based on the reputation of their IP addresses, Web application security on their public-facing apps, DNS health, and network security, including whether they generate bot traffic from infected machines in their networks. Data gathered from SecurityScorecard's sensor-based network is then analyzed by the company's analysis tools, and scored. The firm also studies so-called "hacker chatter" in underground forums about the organizations in question.

Big-name, high-profile schools had some of the lowest scores, the study found. "The strongest security seem to be lesser-known institutions," says Alex Heid, chief research officer at SecurityScorecard. "It could be an indication that they are not as heavily targeted. A lot of the information we pull …  is related to malware infections and exposures to botnets."

"We're able to see open ports that are allowing external Internet traffic," for example, he says. "We have large datasets from massive Internet scans to show what ports and institutions" are exposed, he says.

Several large universities have publicly disclosed breaches in the past few months: in May, Penn State said Chinese hackers over a two-year campaign had infiltrated its College of Engineering systems, and in June, Harvard University announced that its Faculty of Arts and Sciences and Central Administration systems were breached, but that no personal or research information had been compromised. Even so, Harvard warned that the attackers could have grabbed user credentials to then access computers and email accounts.

The University of Virginia (UVA) last month revealed that federal officials had found the school was hit by a cyberattack out of China. Two UVA employees whose work has ties to China appear to have been targeted in that attack.

Universities, given their inherent culture of openness and research -- as well as students bringing all types of their own devices to the network -- traditionally have been relatively soft targets for cybercriminals looking for lucrative financial information, as well as nation-states in search of potentially valuable research intelligence.

ThreatMetrix, a fraud prevention firm, warns that the education sector is ripe for hackers, especially with online testing and mobile devices increasingly being used by students. 

Other studies have highlighted poor security posture on campus: 33% of educational institutions earned an "F" from BitSight's recent ratings on botnet infections. Bot-infected machines are used to move laterally within a network, as well as for other nefarious purposes such as waging distributed denial-of-service attacks on other organizations.

Universities are 300% more likely to house malware in their networks than businesses or government agencies, OpenDNS says, based on data gathered from its network of 50 million users worldwide. That was a much bigger chasm than OpenDNS CTO Dan Hubbard says he expected to see. "You always hear about universities being more open than regular corporations and organizations, but these numbers were a little higher than we expected," Hubbard told Dark Reading when the report was published.

SecurityScorecard in its analysis did not correlate security grades and rankings with actual data breaches at the universities, however. Even so, breaches are mostly a given for higher-education institutions, Heid says: "Pretty much any university at this point is going to have some sort of breach."

One glaring reason: weak and reused passwords are an epidemic on campuses, and leaked university passwords were found circulating the hacker underground. "Across the board at all of them, there were weak passwords. Once a password is circulating, it's assumed at least one person uses the same one for everything. It's just a matter of the scale of the breach and whether it's publicly announced."

Cybercriminals and nation-states alike, are targeting college networks, he says. "Universities have always been stomping grounds for hackers," Heid says. "University facilities are using a lot of legacy systems and legacy software. And a lot of that is being leveraged by attackers."

It takes universities on average nearly a month -- 28 days -- to patch vulnerable applications, the study found.

As for MIT, SecurityScorecard says the school got a poor IP reputation rating, with an average of 1.7 days of malware infections -- a rate that is higher than 80% of the education industry itself.  "Our signals and sensors found 6 credentials for accounts associated with student and employee email discovered in 4 data leaks," the report says.

On the upside, MIT earned A's in web application security, DNS health, and endpoint security, according to SecurityScorecard.

MIT had not responded to press inquiries as of this posting. 

Kelly Jackson Higgins is the Executive Editor of Dark Reading. She is an award-winning veteran technology and business journalist with more than two decades of experience in reporting and editing for various publications, including Network Computing, Secure Enterprise ... View Full Bio
 

Recommended Reading:

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Joe Stanganelli
50%
50%
Joe Stanganelli,
User Rank: Ninja
9/23/2015 | 9:45:33 PM
UVA
The UVA example is particularly important.  It goes to the adage that the best security is to not be a target in the first place -- but now with nation states and hacktivists becoming more involved in hacking major organizations, it is next to impossible to predict whether or not someone you work for, someone who works for you, one of your customers, or someone else that you're associated with will inevitably wind up a target...and putting you in the crosshairs as a matter of association.
charger971
50%
50%
charger971,
User Rank: Apprentice
9/16/2015 | 4:47:56 PM
Very true, but nothing new
Sadly college campuses have been open and exploitable from the beginning.

In the 90s with trojans such as backorifice and netbus being prevalent, one could simply run a port scan across a campus network and find hundreds of infected systems and take control of them.

Despite technology improvements and security being a major buzzword, it appears the trend of insecured educational systems continues today.

A side note; this threat goes beyond college, and and affects the whole education system.  Consider webcams or security cameras at middle and high schools, student PII, and more, all with less security and focus than typical corpate data.
CarolineB773
50%
50%
CarolineB773,
User Rank: Apprentice
9/15/2015 | 5:57:13 AM
Re: Knowledge is OpenSource
I couldn't agree more. It's practically a breeding ground for security risks. You also make a very important point about the students themselves not being intererested in security which is not going to help matters. Also with high social media and Email usage, a college would be a great way to spread malware etc.
Enrico Fontan
50%
50%
Enrico Fontan,
User Rank: Strategist
9/14/2015 | 10:03:58 AM
Security Awareness
Campus LAN have to be considered as "Red" or "High Risk" networks. To minimize such risks staff employees have to receive a detailed training in Security topics as password management, network segregation and log analysis.
Kelly Jackson Higgins
100%
0%
Kelly Jackson Higgins,
User Rank: Strategist
9/11/2015 | 9:58:37 AM
Re: Knowledge is OpenSource
All you have to do is spent a few minutes on a college campus, where WiFi is everywhere, students (many with no concern about security) with all types of BYOD devices are online constantly, and you can see how easy a target universities can be. 
RyanSepe
50%
50%
RyanSepe,
User Rank: Ninja
9/11/2015 | 9:55:30 AM
Knowledge is OpenSource
The fact that education is 300% more likely to be infected is surprising but not too unbelievable. If you think about education in the form of knowledge sharing than for it to be the most effective it would need to be open for people to add to it. Its greatest benefit is its greatest security flaw. Its much like Android. Open-Source is great for innovation but also a travesty for security.
RyanSepe
50%
50%
RyanSepe,
User Rank: Ninja
9/11/2015 | 9:52:47 AM
Advanced Technology Promotes Increased Vulnerabilities
I think that to a certain extent, advanced technology that is not made with security in mind will offer quite a few more vulnerabilities and exploit points than standardized technologies used on a more prevalent basis. This is apparent with MIT's poor performance. Reason being is these technologies focus more on the functionalities. Their ability to do more, makes them an easier target because unfortunately the security is an afterthought.
Edge-DRsplash-10-edge-articles
7 Old IT Things Every New InfoSec Pro Should Know
Joan Goodchild, Staff Editor,  4/20/2021
News
Cloud-Native Businesses Struggle With Security
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  5/6/2021
Commentary
Defending Against Web Scraping Attacks
Rob Simon, Principal Security Consultant at TrustedSec,  5/7/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
2021 Top Enterprise IT Trends
We've identified the key trends that are poised to impact the IT landscape in 2021. Find out why they're important and how they will affect you today!
Flash Poll
How Enterprises are Developing Secure Applications
How Enterprises are Developing Secure Applications
Recent breaches of third-party apps are driving many organizations to think harder about the security of their off-the-shelf software as they continue to move left in secure software development practices.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2021-32089
PUBLISHED: 2021-05-11
** UNSUPPORTED WHEN ASSIGNED ** An issue was discovered on Zebra (formerly Motorola Solutions) Fixed RFID Reader FX9500 devices. An unauthenticated attacker can upload arbitrary files to the filesystem that can then be accessed through the web interface. This can lead to information disclosure and c...
CVE-2020-24586
PUBLISHED: 2021-05-11
The 802.11 standard that underpins Wi-Fi Protected Access (WPA, WPA2, and WPA3) and Wired Equivalent Privacy (WEP) doesn't require that received fragments be cleared from memory after (re)connecting to a network. Under the right circumstances, when another device sends fragmented frames encrypted us...
CVE-2020-24587
PUBLISHED: 2021-05-11
The 802.11 standard that underpins Wi-Fi Protected Access (WPA, WPA2, and WPA3) and Wired Equivalent Privacy (WEP) doesn't require that all fragments of a frame are encrypted under the same key. An adversary can abuse this to decrypt selected fragments when another device sends fragmented frames and...
CVE-2020-24588
PUBLISHED: 2021-05-11
The 802.11 standard that underpins Wi-Fi Protected Access (WPA, WPA2, and WPA3) and Wired Equivalent Privacy (WEP) doesn't require that the A-MSDU flag in the plaintext QoS header field is authenticated. Against devices that support receiving non-SSP A-MSDU frames (which is mandatory as part of 802....
CVE-2020-26139
PUBLISHED: 2021-05-11
An issue was discovered in the kernel in NetBSD 7.1. An Access Point (AP) forwards EAPOL frames to other clients even though the sender has not yet successfully authenticated to the AP. This might be abused in projected Wi-Fi networks to launch denial-of-service attacks against connected clients and...