Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Risk

4/25/2012
05:58 PM
Dark Reading
Dark Reading
Products and Releases
50%
50%

Metaforic Announces Protection For Android Applications

Android application developers can harden their applications to minimize hacking vulnerability

SAN JOSE, Calif., April 25, 2012 /PRNewswire/ -- Metaforic, the innovative software security company, today announced that it had ported its world-class software hardening technology to protect Android applications, which have been subject to some of the worst hacking records in recent history. Using this new technology, Android application developers can harden their applications to minimize hacking vulnerability, protecting both themselves and their users.

Unfortunately, traditional methods of protection on Android are proving to be ineffective. Custom malware attacks on Android applications are increasing exponentially, and theft of software, data and content is rising to match. For example, AV-Test reports a 450% increase in Android malware, totalling over 11,000 active strains of Trojans, bots, spyware, fake installers and premium dialers (http://www.av-test.org/en/tests/android). Worse, the Android ecosystem is itself flawed, allowing delivery of malware loaded applications from both official and unofficial marketplaces.

Joseph Feiman[i], VP and Gartner Fellow said, "Enterprises should prepare themselves for the reality that their applications and data will be used in unexpected ways, abused, stolen, and attacked by outsiders and insiders. Application security is a must."

Metaforic brings application protection to software and data, immunizing it against attacks from hackers and malware. MetaFortress defeats some of the most common attacks on Android applications, including:

-- Repackaging applications with malicious malware -- Privilege escalation from other applications -- Silent activity, such as SMS fraud or dialing of premium services -- Any binary or static data change from hacking or malware Said Neil Stewart, Metaforic CTO: "We're excited to bring our innovative technology to Android and this marketplace. We will show how our industry leading tamper-proofing product can be used at all levels of the Android software stack in order to build a secure foundation for applications. Using MetaFortress for Android in this way can truly secure Android applications from the prevalent threats in the ecosystem."

About Metaforic Metaforic was founded in 2006, and has operations in the USA, EU and Japan. Its flagship product line, MetaFortress, protects virtually any software from subversion, theft, tampering or other corruption. MetaFortress is proven in millions of deployed instances, from consumer software to business devices. Users of MetaFortress find it is easy to apply, has near-zero runtime impact, and defends their software from the inside out. Only software protected by Metaforic earns the Mark of Security. Further information is available at Metaforic's website www.metaforic.com.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Commentary
How SolarWinds Busted Up Our Assumptions About Code Signing
Dr. Jethro Beekman, Technical Director,  3/3/2021
News
'ObliqueRAT' Now Hides Behind Images on Compromised Websites
Jai Vijayan, Contributing Writer,  3/2/2021
News
Attackers Turn Struggling Software Projects Into Trojan Horses
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  2/26/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win an Amazon Gift Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: This comment is waiting for review by our moderators.
Current Issue
2021 Top Enterprise IT Trends
We've identified the key trends that are poised to impact the IT landscape in 2021. Find out why they're important and how they will affect you today!
Flash Poll
How Enterprises are Developing Secure Applications
How Enterprises are Developing Secure Applications
Recent breaches of third-party apps are driving many organizations to think harder about the security of their off-the-shelf software as they continue to move left in secure software development practices.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2021-21360
PUBLISHED: 2021-03-09
Products.GenericSetup is a mini-framework for expressing the configured state of a Zope Site as a set of filesystem artifacts. In Products.GenericSetup before version 2.1.1 there is an information disclosure vulnerability - anonymous visitors may view log and snapshot files generated by the Generic ...
CVE-2021-21361
PUBLISHED: 2021-03-09
The `com.bmuschko:gradle-vagrant-plugin` Gradle plugin contains an information disclosure vulnerability due to the logging of the system environment variables. When this Gradle plugin is executed in public CI/CD, this can lead to sensitive credentials being exposed to malicious actors. This is fixed...
CVE-2021-24033
PUBLISHED: 2021-03-09
react-dev-utils prior to v11.0.4 exposes a function, getProcessForPort, where an input argument is concatenated into a command string to be executed. This function is typically used from react-scripts (in Create React App projects), where the usage is safe. Only when this function is manually invoke...
CVE-2021-21510
PUBLISHED: 2021-03-08
Dell iDRAC8 versions prior to 2.75.100.75 contain a host header injection vulnerability. A remote unauthenticated attacker may potentially exploit this vulnerability by injecting arbitrary ‘Host’ header values to poison a web-cache or trigger redirections.
CVE-2020-27575
PUBLISHED: 2021-03-08
Maxum Rumpus 8.2.13 and 8.2.14 is affected by a command injection vulnerability. The web administration contains functionality in which administrators are able to manage users. The edit users form contains a parameter vulnerable to command injection due to insufficient validation.