Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Endpoint

8/3/2010
03:37 PM
Connect Directly
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

IT Pros Use Personal Email, Storage Devices To Move Company Files

New survey shows how convenience typically wins over security

Personal email accounts are one of the main conduits of choice for IT professionals to bypass corporate controls and send sensitive or confidential information, according to a new survey.

The survey, taken at InfoSecurity Europe by Ipswitch, found that 40 percent of IT pros use their personal accounts to hide their file transfers. Nearly 70 percent of the respondents say they send classified information on payroll, customers, and financials via unsecured email at least once a month, and 34 percent do so daily. That doesn't mean it's all about deceit: Many were looking for convenience and speed of transfer, according to Ipswitch.

"Regardless of the motive, employees that send confidential files via unsecured e-mail are putting their organizations at risk for a breach. Personal email relinquishes security, auditability, and compliance," says L. Frank Kenney, vice president of global strategy for Ipswitch.

More than 40 percent say they use their personal USBs and DVDs to back up work files monthly. And 70 percent access files weekly from their employers via mobile devices, Webmail, and remote connections.

"Personal devices are far too easily lost or stolen," Ipswitch's Kenney says. "They do provide a simple means of backing up and sharing information, but using them to transfer sensitive data will cause major problems -- internally and externally -- if they are misplaced."

Meanwhile, 62 percent say they have file-sharing policies in their organizations, but 72 percent say they don't have the ability to see files moving inside and outside the organization. "At the heart of the problem is visibility, or lack thereof," Kenney says.

Ipswitch provides more insight to the report via this YouTube clip.

Have a comment on this story? Please click "Discuss" below. If you'd like to contact Dark Reading's editors directly, send us a message.

Kelly Jackson Higgins is the Executive Editor of Dark Reading. She is an award-winning veteran technology and business journalist with more than two decades of experience in reporting and editing for various publications, including Network Computing, Secure Enterprise ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Why Vulnerable Code Is Shipped Knowingly
Chris Eng, Chief Research Officer, Veracode,  11/30/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
2021 Top Enterprise IT Trends
We've identified the key trends that are poised to impact the IT landscape in 2021. Find out why they're important and how they will affect you today!
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-27348
PUBLISHED: 2020-12-04
In some conditions, a snap package built by snapcraft includes the current directory in LD_LIBRARY_PATH, allowing a malicious snap to gain code execution within the context of another snap if both plug the home interface or similar. This issue affects snapcraft versions prior to 4.4.4, prior to 2.43...
CVE-2020-16123
PUBLISHED: 2020-12-04
An Ubuntu-specific patch in PulseAudio created a race condition where the snap policy module would fail to identify a client connection from a snap as coming from a snap if SCM_CREDENTIALS were missing, allowing the snap to connect to PulseAudio without proper confinement. This could be exploited by...
CVE-2018-21270
PUBLISHED: 2020-12-03
Versions less than 0.0.6 of the Node.js stringstream module are vulnerable to an out-of-bounds read because of allocation of uninitialized buffers when a number is passed in the input stream (when using Node.js 4.x).
CVE-2020-26248
PUBLISHED: 2020-12-03
In the PrestaShop module "productcomments" before version 4.2.1, an attacker can use a Blind SQL injection to retrieve data or stop the MySQL service. The problem is fixed in 4.2.1 of the module.
CVE-2020-29529
PUBLISHED: 2020-12-03
HashiCorp go-slug before 0.5.0 does not address attempts at directory traversal involving ../ and symlinks.