Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Risk

7/16/2019
10:30 AM
Terry Ray
Terry Ray
Commentary
Connect Directly
Twitter
LinkedIn
RSS
E-Mail vvv
50%
50%

Is 2019 the Year of the CISO?

The case for bringing the CISO to the C-suite's risk and business-strategy table.

PwC reported that 81% of investors and analysts responding to its 2018 Global Investor Survey ranked cybersecurity among the top three threats to business; more than half of those said that cybersecurity was the No. 1 biggest threat to business. The natural upshot should be that the CISO is more important to business strategy — but in many cases, that's an uphill climb.

The traditional view of the CISO is that of a specialized mini-CIO — existing to achieve compliance, put out security fires, and stand in as a scapegoat for when something inevitably goes wrong so the CIO doesn't have to take the heat. A case in point: Target had no CISO when it suffered its infamous point-of-sale mega breach in 2013; consequently, it was Target's then CIO who was compelled to resign shortly thereafter. Only then did Target create and fill a CISO position, answering to the new CIO.

Across both the private sector and the public sector, the plurality of CISOs report to the CIO. A subset of enterprise organizations, however, are increasingly realizing that this is a suboptimal approach.

For starters, many have recognized that a CIO having a CISO answer to him or her presents a conflict of interest because the CIO and CISO each have different budgetary interests and are measured against different objectives. Whereas CISOs are so security-driven that "security" is right in their job titles, CIOs are pressured to make decisions that favor business agility above all else; security is an afterthought compared with functional viability. Meanwhile, CISOs have "security" in their job titles for a reason — but a CISO who reports to a CIO or other IT operations manager is unlikely to report his or her boss to the legal department for inevitable compliance failures.

Over the past few years, Congressional staffers, federal, and state regulatory bodies, and industry collaboratives alike have made these same observations — specifically dictating that CISOs report to a risk officer, the general counsel, the CEO, or even straight up to the board of directors. Lately, these recommendations and requirements have begun to take hold. A May 2018 industry report from Dark Reading about the role of CISOs notes that the CISOs have at least a "dotted reporting structure" — if not a direct one — to boards and/or CEOs. And this reporting structure is crucial when it comes not only for mitigating liability and compliance risks (i.e., so that, after an inevitable data breach, the company can show regulators that its board of directors and CEO met with the CISO on cybersecurity issues x number of times every year), but also for crafting cybersecurity and data-stewardship solutions for effective business strategy going forward. Without the CISO, boards and CEOs may not even be able to identify the right questions to ask or the right problems to solve in the first place.

The whole concept of a CIO indicates that that person has full control of the company's infrastructure and IT decisions. A CISO would typically be a part of that, but that's not necessarily reflective of what the pecking order should be. Just because the CISO will work extensively with the CIO doesn't mean that the CISO should report to the CIO — just like the general counsel shouldn't report to the executive vice president of sales just because the legal department has to work extensively with the sales teams. These are separate entities working together incidentally — and the IT team and the information security team are likewise separate from each other.

This is because the CISO position is no longer a niche technology role. Cyber presence is sufficiently ubiquitous today that, for many enterprise organizations, the Internet is their primary (if not only) go-to-market platform. In this environment, the CISO's job must be one to step to the forefront and evangelize the following bullet points:

  • "We are under attack." There are constant attempted cyberattacks — usually automated — every single day against every major enterprise.
  • "Our attackers will succeed, eventually." Everybody's being breached. We, too, will be breached someday (assuming we haven't been breached already). We must be prepared with the knowledge and tools to minimize and respond both during and after a breach.
  • "Cybersecurity is a business issue — not a tech issue." How we manage our cyber presence and secure our data drastically affects our ability to do business — from an accessibility standpoint, from a brand-trust standpoint, and from a regulatory compliance standpoint.

All of these bullet points combined make for a grander and more important message, which is one that investors already know: "Cybersecurity is about extreme monetary risk."

And there you have it. CISOs deal with far heavier risk assessment and risk management issues than do generalist IT leaders — to the point where their job is all about risk and only incidentally about IT, rather than the other way around. The CISO job therefore needs to just be part of the organization's risk hierarchy instead of the IT department. The CISO is, first and foremost, a risk manager — a digitally present risk manager, but a risk manager nonetheless.

Let the CISO answer accordingly.

Related Content:

 

Black Hat USA returns to Las Vegas with hands-on technical Trainings, cutting-edge Briefings, Arsenal open-source tool demonstrations, top-tier security solutions and service providers in the Business Hall. Click for information on the conference and to register.

Terry Ray has global responsibility for Imperva's technology strategy. He was the first US-based Imperva employee, and has been with the company for 14 years. He works with organizations around the world to help them discover and protect sensitive data, minimize risk for ... View Full Bio
 

Recommended Reading:

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
COVID-19: Latest Security News & Commentary
Dark Reading Staff 10/23/2020
7 Tips for Choosing Security Metrics That Matter
Ericka Chickowski, Contributing Writer,  10/19/2020
Russian Military Officers Unmasked, Indicted for High-Profile Cyberattack Campaigns
Kelly Jackson Higgins, Executive Editor at Dark Reading,  10/19/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
Special Report: Computing's New Normal
This special report examines how IT security organizations have adapted to the "new normal" of computing and what the long-term effects will be. Read it and get a unique set of perspectives on issues ranging from new threats & vulnerabilities as a result of remote working to how enterprise security strategy will be affected long term.
Flash Poll
How IT Security Organizations are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
How IT Security Organizations are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
The COVID-19 pandemic turned the world -- and enterprise computing -- on end. Here's a look at how cybersecurity teams are retrenching their defense strategies, rebuilding their teams, and selecting new technologies to stop the oncoming rise of online attacks.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-24847
PUBLISHED: 2020-10-23
A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability is identified in FruityWifi through 2.4. Due to a lack of CSRF protection in page_config_adv.php, an unauthenticated attacker can lure the victim to visit his website by social engineering or another attack vector. Due to this issue, an unauthenticat...
CVE-2020-24848
PUBLISHED: 2020-10-23
FruityWifi through 2.4 has an unsafe Sudo configuration [(ALL : ALL) NOPASSWD: ALL]. This allows an attacker to perform a system-level (root) local privilege escalation, allowing an attacker to gain complete persistent access to the local system.
CVE-2020-5990
PUBLISHED: 2020-10-23
NVIDIA GeForce Experience, all versions prior to 3.20.5.70, contains a vulnerability in the ShadowPlay component which may lead to local privilege escalation, code execution, denial of service or information disclosure.
CVE-2020-25483
PUBLISHED: 2020-10-23
An arbitrary command execution vulnerability exists in the fopen() function of file writes of UCMS v1.4.8, where an attacker can gain access to the server.
CVE-2020-5977
PUBLISHED: 2020-10-23
NVIDIA GeForce Experience, all versions prior to 3.20.5.70, contains a vulnerability in NVIDIA Web Helper NodeJS Web Server in which an uncontrolled search path is used to load a node module, which may lead to code execution, denial of service, escalation of privileges, and information disclosure.