Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Perimeter

12/11/2012
02:35 PM
50%
50%

Hauling That 50-Pound Sack Of Compliance

Done wrong, your compliance efforts can needlessly weigh your team down

A business owner recently told me she was aware her business had done little toward necessary HIPAA compliance. She had reasons, of course. The economy was making business difficult, they were short on cash for extra projects, their profit margins were too small, and the staff was spread too thin to take on any new tasks or projects.

I understand her challenges. I've faced the similar issues as a business owner for more than 20 years. I also learned, the hard way I might add, that as your business grows, doing more of what you've been doing all along doesn't always support business growth.

What do I mean by that? I mean that healthy business growth is rarely doing the same things in the same way, only in volume. Businesses must change how they approach the different challenges that different stages of growth demand. As my wife, Doris, an entrepreneur in her own right, once said, "What works for one does not work for two. What works for two does not work for three." You can apply this to just about any task, process, number of locations, or number of employees.

Let's again consider the noncompliant business owner. Because she is comfortable with the idea that her company is small, she's trying to operate it as if it were still small, even though the problems she faces are far beyond small-shop challenges. She will never have the resources, in cash or staff, to address her compliance issues until she changes her business model to reflect its new, larger scale. And that assumes she survives long enough to evolve into that new business model.

Until this business owner transitions her business processes, requiring compliance would be like asking her employees to carry around a 50-pound sack. Even if the 50-pound sack has important contents, the extra weight and unwieldiness of it all will cause her business to slow further, maybe to stall -- a stall that may not be survivable.

So what is she, and others like her, to do about the seemingly weighty demands of compliance and security? The exact same thing any organization of any size should do: Build processes and operations to match the real business needs. Don't add compliance and security later; incorporate them from the start. To wait until later means you didn't plan for the extra weight these requirements place on your business.

If your organization cannot manage the cost of time, people, or money to incorporated compliance and security, then you either have not planned it correctly, or you do not have an economically viable business model. In the former case, develop plans that work. If you need help, many others have done this successfully, and hiring them can be less expensive in the long run than failing or risking noncompliance.

In the case you are simply not economically viable, you have a hard decision to make. You can find a new way, stop now before you suffer more, or die a slow business death that wastes more money and days of your life.

Glenn S. Phillips would like to lose about ten pounds. He is the president of Forte' Incorporated where he works with business leaders who want to leverage technology and understand the often hidden risks within. Glenn is the author of the book Nerd-to-English and you can find him on twitter at @NerdToEnglish. Glenn works with business leaders who want to leverage technology and understand the often hidden risks awaiting them. The Founder and Sr. Consultant of Forte' Incorporated, Glenn and his team work with business leaders to support growth, increase profits, and address ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
DevSecOps: The Answer to the Cloud Security Skills Gap
Lamont Orange, Chief Information Security Officer at Netskope,  11/15/2019
Attackers' Costs Increasing as Businesses Focus on Security
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  11/15/2019
Human Nature vs. AI: A False Dichotomy?
John McClurg, Sr. VP & CISO, BlackBerry,  11/18/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win a Starbucks Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: -when I told you that our cyber-defense was from another age
Current Issue
Navigating the Deluge of Security Data
In this Tech Digest, Dark Reading shares the experiences of some top security practitioners as they navigate volumes of security data. We examine some examples of how enterprises can cull this data to find the clues they need.
Flash Poll
Rethinking Enterprise Data Defense
Rethinking Enterprise Data Defense
Frustrated with recurring intrusions and breaches, cybersecurity professionals are questioning some of the industrys conventional wisdom. Heres a look at what theyre thinking about.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2011-3350
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-19
masqmail 0.2.21 through 0.2.30 improperly calls seteuid() in src/log.c and src/masqmail.c that results in improper privilege dropping.
CVE-2011-3352
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-19
Zikula 1.3.0 build #3168 and probably prior has XSS flaw due to improper sanitization of the 'themename' parameter by setting default, modifying and deleting themes. A remote attacker with Zikula administrator privilege could use this flaw to execute arbitrary HTML or web script code in the context ...
CVE-2011-3349
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-19
lightdm before 0.9.6 writes in .dmrc and Xauthority files using root permissions while the files are in user controlled folders. A local user can overwrite root-owned files via a symlink, which can allow possible privilege escalation.
CVE-2019-10080
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-19
The XMLFileLookupService in NiFi versions 1.3.0 to 1.9.2 allowed trusted users to inadvertently configure a potentially malicious XML file. The XML file has the ability to make external calls to services (via XXE) and reveal information such as the versions of Java, Jersey, and Apache that the NiFI ...
CVE-2019-10083
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-19
When updating a Process Group via the API in NiFi versions 1.3.0 to 1.9.2, the response to the request includes all of its contents (at the top most level, not recursively). The response included details about processors and controller services which the user may not have had read access to.