Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Perimeter

10/14/2009
01:20 PM
Adrian Lane
Adrian Lane
Commentary
50%
50%

Getting Around Vertical Database Security

A few database administrators told me they wanted to know why database security is vertical and how they can fix it. True, database access controls are vertical. The basic construct of a database is a table, and access controls grant access to tables or columns. This means you can see all of the entries from top to bottom, or none at all. Access is vertical and it lacks granularity.

A few database administrators told me they wanted to know why database security is vertical and how they can fix it. True, database access controls are vertical. The basic construct of a database is a table, and access controls grant access to tables or columns. This means you can see all of the entries from top to bottom, or none at all. Access is vertical and it lacks granularity.Say you want to restrict access to some of the rows, but not all of them. For example, you may not want all human resources personnel to see all employee records in the database, or you may want to restrict call center employees to a subset of all customer records. You then need to divide tables horizontally, safeguarding segments of the table, or even individual rows. There are several ways to do this, but here are a few tricks:

Queries: The most common method to segment horizontally is through queries. You add a 'where' clause to the query to perform additional comparisons, selecting just those rows appropriate to the application or job function.

This is the preferred method, but if you must restrict access of the user who is writing the query, or are worried about Web applications that alter the query dynamically, adding a 'where' clause to the query is insufficient.

Views: A view is nothing more than a virtual copy of a table. This virtual table is defined by a query where we only retrieve a select number of columns and rows, thereby presenting the subset of data you want the user to see. You provide the user access to the view, but not to the underlying table. Views are in essence a mask, revealing some of the information but concealing the rest.

Table Partitioning: Partitioning is where you create one logical table, but disperse physical portions of the table across different databases/partitions. You direct the database to store data in different partitions based upon the key value of the record. For example, data may be keyed 'top secret' and stored in one location, and 'informational' data stored in another. Resetting privileges within each of the databases can shield data within the same table.

Labels. Labeling is a way to tag individual rows with some form of identifier that denotes how the data is handled. Rather than use a key field, a new column is added to the table and labels are applied to each row. Databases with native labeling technology will automatically screen rows from users who do not have access to specified tags. Labels are not available with all databases as a native function, but can be simulated manually adding columns and using views as discussed above.

These solutions are applicable in cases where rewriting or re-architecting the application is not possible, but finer-grained data access controls are needed. In all cases you are adding structure or altering a subset of queries, with each option requiring different management and code change burdens. Use only if access controls cannot provide what you need.

Adrian Lane is an analyst/CTO with Securosis LLC, an independent security consulting practice. Special to Dark Reading. Adrian Lane is a Security Strategist and brings over 25 years of industry experience to the Securosis team, much of it at the executive level. Adrian specializes in database security, data security, and secure software development. With experience at Ingres, Oracle, and ... View Full Bio

 

Recommended Reading:

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Threaded  |  Newest First  |  Oldest First
COVID-19: Latest Security News & Commentary
Dark Reading Staff 8/10/2020
Researcher Finds New Office Macro Attacks for MacOS
Curtis Franklin Jr., Senior Editor at Dark Reading,  8/7/2020
Lock-Pickers Face an Uncertain Future Online
Seth Rosenblatt, Contributing Writer,  8/10/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win an Amazon Gift Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: They said you could use Zoom anywhere.......
Current Issue
Special Report: Computing's New Normal, a Dark Reading Perspective
This special report examines how IT security organizations have adapted to the "new normal" of computing and what the long-term effects will be. Read it and get a unique set of perspectives on issues ranging from new threats & vulnerabilities as a result of remote working to how enterprise security strategy will be affected long term.
Flash Poll
The Changing Face of Threat Intelligence
The Changing Face of Threat Intelligence
This special report takes a look at how enterprises are using threat intelligence, as well as emerging best practices for integrating threat intel into security operations and incident response. Download it today!
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-14483
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-13
A timeout during a TLS handshake can result in the connection failing to terminate. This can result in a Niagara thread hanging and requires a manual restart of Niagara (Versions 4.6.96.28, 4.7.109.20, 4.7.110.32, 4.8.0.110) and Niagara Enterprise Security (Versions 2.4.31, 2.4.45, 4.8.0.35) to corr...
CVE-2020-11733
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-13
An issue was discovered on Spirent TestCenter and Avalanche appliance admin interface firmware. An attacker, who already has access to an SSH restricted shell, can achieve root access via shell metacharacters. The attacker can then, for example, read sensitive files such as appliance admin configura...
CVE-2020-13281
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-13
For GitLab before 13.0.12, 13.1.6, 13.2.3 a denial of service exists in the project import feature
CVE-2020-13286
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-13
For GitLab before 13.0.12, 13.1.6, 13.2.3 user controlled git configuration settings can be modified to result in Server Side Request Forgery.
CVE-2020-15925
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-13
A SQL injection vulnerability at a tpf URI in Loway QueueMetrics before 19.10.21 allows remote authenticated attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands via the TPF_XPAR1 parameter.