Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Risk

3/8/2017
12:15 PM
Connect Directly
Twitter
LinkedIn
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Fortune 1000 Companies See Security Ratings Drop

Fortune 1000 businesses report more breaches, and lower security performance, than their non-F1000 counterparts.

Fortune 1000 companies are at greater risk for cyberattacks compared with non-Fortune 1000 businesses, due to the types of data they possess and weak security strategies, according to new research from security ratings firm Bitsight.

Bitsight analyzed the security performance at Fortune 1000 companies by comparing them with a random sample of 2,500 businesses with similar industry breakdown and at least 2,500 employees.

Fortune 1000 companies are at a weaker security level than their counterparts, explains Stephen Boyer, CTO and cofounder at BitSight. As of Jan. 31, the median rating for Fortune 1000 companies was 700 (on a scale of 250 to 900), when non-F1000 businesses were performing at 730.

Over the past 15 months, one in every 20 Fortune 1000 organizations experienced a publicly disclosed breach; nearly double the rate of non-F1000 companies.

Fortune 1000 companies' security performance overall also dropped: although 52 companies improved, 103 saw their ratings fall between October 2016 and January 2017.

"A likely cause of this may be that Fortune 1000 organizations possess the type of data that make them more likely to have a legal obligation to disclose a breach," says Boyer.

Researchers also foundAndroidBauts and Necurs in 10% of Fortune 1000 companies. The Necurs botnet is responsible for driving several ransomware campaigns and known to have strong DDoS capabilities. The prevalence of AndroidBauts, a malicious adware and infostealer for Android, is a sign of the growing mobile security challenge, Boyer says. 

Despite comparatively weak performance, Boyer notes many Fortune 1000 companies have a strong security posture. The 75th percentile of these businesses is on the same level as their counterparts; however, a larger percentage of Fortune 1000 companies are at the bottom end of the spectrum. Many share the same flaws.

"There were a few areas where Fortune 1000 companies, on aggregate, appear to have weaknesses," he explains. "One area is the rate of system compromises on their networks." In March 2016, over 40% of these businesses had at least one occurrence of system compromise.

Many organizations also fail to secure their online services, Boyer continues. Most Fortune 1000 companies run Telnet on an open port. The unencrypted remote administration service can enable attackers to access communications or remotely control machines.

Because it's fairly simple to put these services behind a firewall or VPN, Boyer says this fallback could signify the existence of larger problems in an enterprise security program.

Previous Bitsight reports have found businesses with more online services are more likely to suffer data breaches. An earlier study on cyber practices and data breaches discovered 60% of breached organizations had at least 10 ports exposed to hackers, compared with 40% of non-breached businesses.

Boyer shares a few pieces of advice for those working to improve their security posture.

"Fortune 1000 companies should, first and foremost, prioritize incident detection and response," he says. "Companies that ensure system compromises are quickly remediated will likely reduce the chance of data exfiltration and breaches."

Businesses should also ensure there are no unnecessary open services on their network being exposed to the Internet.

"While it may seem obvious to some, an astonishing rate of organizations run some services on an open port that may introduce immediate security risk," he says.

Related Content:

Kelly Sheridan is the Staff Editor at Dark Reading, where she focuses on cybersecurity news and analysis. She is a business technology journalist who previously reported for InformationWeek, where she covered Microsoft, and Insurance & Technology, where she covered financial ... View Full Bio
 

Recommended Reading:

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
News
Inside the Ransomware Campaigns Targeting Exchange Servers
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  4/2/2021
Commentary
Beyond MITRE ATT&CK: The Case for a New Cyber Kill Chain
Rik Turner, Principal Analyst, Infrastructure Solutions, Omdia,  3/30/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
2021 Top Enterprise IT Trends
We've identified the key trends that are poised to impact the IT landscape in 2021. Find out why they're important and how they will affect you today!
Flash Poll
How Enterprises are Developing Secure Applications
How Enterprises are Developing Secure Applications
Recent breaches of third-party apps are driving many organizations to think harder about the security of their off-the-shelf software as they continue to move left in secure software development practices.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2021-23281
PUBLISHED: 2021-04-13
Eaton Intelligent Power Manager (IPM) prior to 1.69 is vulnerable to unauthenticated remote code execution vulnerability. IPM software does not sanitize the date provided via coverterCheckList action in meta_driver_srv.js class. Attackers can send a specially crafted packet to make IPM connect to ro...
CVE-2021-27598
PUBLISHED: 2021-04-13
SAP NetWeaver AS JAVA (Customer Usage Provisioning Servlet), versions - 7.31, 7.40, 7.50, allows an attacker to read some statistical data like product version, traffic, timestamp etc. because of missing authorization check in the servlet.
CVE-2021-27600
PUBLISHED: 2021-04-13
SAP Manufacturing Execution (System Rules), versions - 15.1, 15.2, 15.3, 15.4, allows an authorized attacker to embed malicious code into HTTP parameter and send it to the server because SAP Manufacturing Execution (System Rules) tab does not sufficiently encode some parameters, resulting in Stored ...
CVE-2021-27601
PUBLISHED: 2021-04-13
SAP NetWeaver AS Java (Applications based on HTMLB for Java) allows a basic-level authorized attacker to store a malicious file on the server. When a victim tries to open this file, it results in a Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability and the attacker can read and modify data. However, the attac...
CVE-2021-27602
PUBLISHED: 2021-04-13
SAP Commerce, versions - 1808, 1811, 1905, 2005, 2011, Backoffice application allows certain authorized users to create source rules which are translated to drools rule when published to certain modules within the application. An attacker with this authorization can inject malicious code in the sour...