Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Risk

3/16/2010
05:52 PM
Connect Directly
Google+
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Flaw In Microsoft's Hypervisor Lets Attackers Bypass DEP, ASLR

Virtual PC hypervisor bug and proof-of-concept revealed by Core Security Technologies -- but Microsoft says it's not technically a vulnerability

Core Security Technologies has discovered a flaw in Microsoft's Virtual PC hypervisor that can be used by an attacker to cheat built-in, advanced security features in Windows.

The flaw in the memory management function of the hypervisor affects Microsoft Virtual PC 2007, Virtual PC 2007 SP1, Windows Virtual PC, Microsoft Virtual Server 2005, and the XP Mode feature in Windows 7. Microsoft's Hyper-V technology is not affected by the vulnerability.

Core first reported its discovery of the vulnerability to Microsoft in August. Microsoft will fix the issue in future updates to the products, according to Core. For now, users should run mission-critical applications on native hardware and software platforms, or employ virtualization software not affected by the flaw.

Microsoft says the attack is based on using existing vulnerabilities rather than an actual vulnerability itself: "It does this by rendering a number of protection mechanisms that are present in the Windows kernel less effective inside a virtual machine as opposed to a physical Windows machine. An attacker would need to abuse an already present vulnerability in order to leverage this technique," a Microsoft spokesperson says.

And an attacker would not be able to take over an entire host machine running multiple virtual machines, the spokesperson notes. "An attacker can only exploit a vulnerable application running inside the guest virtual machine on Windows XP, rather than Windows 7," according to Microsoft.

But according to Core, the danger of the vulnerability is in its ability to bypass Windows' Data Execution Prevention (DEP), Safe Exception Handlers (SafeSEH), and Address Space Layout Randomization (ASLR) features in some versions of Windows. So applications with nonexploitable bugs in nonvirtualized environments could then be exploited when run in a guest operating system in the Virtual PC, says Ivan Arce, CTO of Core.

"This makes all kinds of exploits easier to exploit," Arce says. "DEP and ASLR are ineffective," he says.

This is an example of a future trend in attacks, he says, where attackers writing exploits for code execution will look for ways to circumvent memory address space. While security features like DEP and ASLR have improved Windows security overall, he says, adding virtualization can introduce new vulnerabilities.

"There may be issues in virtualization that will impact the rest of the OS or infrastructure, and this is an example of that," Arce says. "I think this is going to be an ongoing trend in the future, where [attackers] are not just attempting to circumvent security protections, but using virtualization to find different problems and exploit them."

Meanwhile, the memory management bug in the Virtual Machine Monitor lets an attacker access so-called "high" memory above 2 gigabytes and gain read or read/write privileges from apps running in the guest OS, according to Core.

Core also released proof-of-concept code demonstrating the flaw and how it could be exploited.

Have a comment on this story? Please click "Discuss" below. If you'd like to contact Dark Reading's editors directly, send us a message.. Kelly Jackson Higgins is Executive Editor at DarkReading.com. She is an award-winning veteran technology and business journalist with more than two decades of experience in reporting and editing for various publications, including Network Computing, Secure Enterprise ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
US Turning Up the Heat on North Korea's Cyber Threat Operations
Jai Vijayan, Contributing Writer,  9/16/2019
NetCAT Vulnerability Is Out of the Bag
Dark Reading Staff 9/12/2019
Preventing PTSD and Burnout for Cybersecurity Professionals
Craig Hinkley, CEO, WhiteHat Security,  9/16/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
7 Threats & Disruptive Forces Changing the Face of Cybersecurity
This Dark Reading Tech Digest gives an in-depth look at the biggest emerging threats and disruptive forces that are changing the face of cybersecurity today.
Flash Poll
The State of IT Operations and Cybersecurity Operations
The State of IT Operations and Cybersecurity Operations
Your enterprise's cyber risk may depend upon the relationship between the IT team and the security team. Heres some insight on what's working and what isn't in the data center.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-15943
PUBLISHED: 2019-09-19
vphysics.dll in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive before 1.37.1.1 allows remote attackers to achieve code execution or denial of service by creating a gaming server and inviting a victim to this server, because a crafted map is mishandled during a memset call.
CVE-2019-16413
PUBLISHED: 2019-09-19
An issue was discovered in the Linux kernel before 5.0.4. The 9p filesystem did not protect i_size_write() properly, which causes an i_size_read() infinite loop and denial of service on SMP systems.
CVE-2019-3738
PUBLISHED: 2019-09-18
RSA BSAFE Crypto-J versions prior to 6.2.5 are vulnerable to an Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature vulnerability. A malicious remote attacker could potentially exploit this vulnerability to coerce two parties into computing the same predictable shared key.
CVE-2019-3739
PUBLISHED: 2019-09-18
RSA BSAFE Crypto-J versions prior to 6.2.5 are vulnerable to Information Exposure Through Timing Discrepancy vulnerabilities during ECDSA key generation. A malicious remote attacker could potentially exploit those vulnerabilities to recover ECDSA keys.
CVE-2019-3740
PUBLISHED: 2019-09-18
RSA BSAFE Crypto-J versions prior to 6.2.5 are vulnerable to an Information Exposure Through Timing Discrepancy vulnerabilities during DSA key generation. A malicious remote attacker could potentially exploit those vulnerabilities to recover DSA keys.