Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Endpoint

4/26/2011
06:53 PM
Connect Directly
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Few Consumers Victimized By Online Fraud Report It

New Ponemon Institute report shows consumers prefer using machine fingerprinting over personal information to verify their identities online

Most consumers who have been victims of online fraud don't report it, a new study has found.

Forty-two percent of consumers surveyed in a report by The Ponemon Institute say they have been the victim of online fraud, yet 80 percent of them didn't report it. Just less than 20 percent reported it to the online business involved.

"A lot of fraudulent activity goes unreported today, making it difficult for online businesses to fully understand the prominence and seriousness of the problem," said Reed Taussig, president and CEO of ThreatMetrix, which sponsored the report. "With a rise in online transactions and activities across devices, more needs to be done to educate online merchants, banks, social outlets and other businesses on how to decrease fraudulent activity."

Interestingly, consumers are starting to look for antifraud actions by their online merchants: Fifty-six percent of consumers say they are more willing to browse or shop an online business if that site is working on combating fraud, and most prefer sharing device-specific information for authentication rather than personal information to prove they are who they say they are.

"Our survey results help validate the need and consumer preference for technology, such as device identification, to authenticate identity as opposed to using personally identifiable information," said Larry Ponemon, chairman and founder of the Ponemon Institute. "Consumers expressed much more willingness to share data like ISP, computer serial number, type and make, rather than information like date of birth and telephone number."

Among the information they are willing to use for online authentication verification: serial number of their computers (88 percent); computer type and make (83 percent); ISP (76 percent); browser type (65 percent); IP address (59 percent); types of software apps running (54 percent); email address (46 percent); purchase history (39 percent); planned purchases (35 percent); birth date (34 percent); telephone number (17 percent); home address (16 percent); name (14 percent); ZIP code (9 percent); Social Security number (4 percent); and driver's license number (2 percent).

Eighty-five percent say they are worried and unhappy with the protection online sites provide today, the survey found. A full copy of the report can be downloaded here.

Have a comment on this story? Please click "Add Your Comment" below. If you'd like to contact Dark Reading's editors directly, send us a message.

Kelly Jackson Higgins is the Executive Editor of Dark Reading. She is an award-winning veteran technology and business journalist with more than two decades of experience in reporting and editing for various publications, including Network Computing, Secure Enterprise ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Commentary
What the FedEx Logo Taught Me About Cybersecurity
Matt Shea, Head of Federal @ MixMode,  6/4/2021
Edge-DRsplash-10-edge-articles
A View From Inside a Deception
Sara Peters, Senior Editor at Dark Reading,  6/2/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
The State of Cybersecurity Incident Response
In this report learn how enterprises are building their incident response teams and processes, how they research potential compromises, how they respond to new breaches, and what tools and processes they use to remediate problems and improve their cyber defenses for the future.
Flash Poll
How Enterprises are Developing Secure Applications
How Enterprises are Developing Secure Applications
Recent breaches of third-party apps are driving many organizations to think harder about the security of their off-the-shelf software as they continue to move left in secure software development practices.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2021-34682
PUBLISHED: 2021-06-12
Receita Federal IRPF 2021 1.7 allows a man-in-the-middle attack against the update feature.
CVE-2021-31811
PUBLISHED: 2021-06-12
In Apache PDFBox, a carefully crafted PDF file can trigger an OutOfMemory-Exception while loading the file. This issue affects Apache PDFBox version 2.0.23 and prior 2.0.x versions.
CVE-2021-31812
PUBLISHED: 2021-06-12
In Apache PDFBox, a carefully crafted PDF file can trigger an infinite loop while loading the file. This issue affects Apache PDFBox version 2.0.23 and prior 2.0.x versions.
CVE-2021-32552
PUBLISHED: 2021-06-12
It was discovered that read_file() in apport/hookutils.py would follow symbolic links or open FIFOs. When this function is used by the openjdk-16 package apport hooks, it could expose private data to other local users.
CVE-2021-32553
PUBLISHED: 2021-06-12
It was discovered that read_file() in apport/hookutils.py would follow symbolic links or open FIFOs. When this function is used by the openjdk-17 package apport hooks, it could expose private data to other local users.