Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Endpoint

4/26/2011
06:53 PM
Connect Directly
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Few Consumers Victimized By Online Fraud Report It

New Ponemon Institute report shows consumers prefer using machine fingerprinting over personal information to verify their identities online

Most consumers who have been victims of online fraud don't report it, a new study has found.

Forty-two percent of consumers surveyed in a report by The Ponemon Institute say they have been the victim of online fraud, yet 80 percent of them didn't report it. Just less than 20 percent reported it to the online business involved.

"A lot of fraudulent activity goes unreported today, making it difficult for online businesses to fully understand the prominence and seriousness of the problem," said Reed Taussig, president and CEO of ThreatMetrix, which sponsored the report. "With a rise in online transactions and activities across devices, more needs to be done to educate online merchants, banks, social outlets and other businesses on how to decrease fraudulent activity."

Interestingly, consumers are starting to look for antifraud actions by their online merchants: Fifty-six percent of consumers say they are more willing to browse or shop an online business if that site is working on combating fraud, and most prefer sharing device-specific information for authentication rather than personal information to prove they are who they say they are.

"Our survey results help validate the need and consumer preference for technology, such as device identification, to authenticate identity as opposed to using personally identifiable information," said Larry Ponemon, chairman and founder of the Ponemon Institute. "Consumers expressed much more willingness to share data like ISP, computer serial number, type and make, rather than information like date of birth and telephone number."

Among the information they are willing to use for online authentication verification: serial number of their computers (88 percent); computer type and make (83 percent); ISP (76 percent); browser type (65 percent); IP address (59 percent); types of software apps running (54 percent); email address (46 percent); purchase history (39 percent); planned purchases (35 percent); birth date (34 percent); telephone number (17 percent); home address (16 percent); name (14 percent); ZIP code (9 percent); Social Security number (4 percent); and driver's license number (2 percent).

Eighty-five percent say they are worried and unhappy with the protection online sites provide today, the survey found. A full copy of the report can be downloaded here.

Have a comment on this story? Please click "Add Your Comment" below. If you'd like to contact Dark Reading's editors directly, send us a message.

Kelly Jackson Higgins is the Executive Editor of Dark Reading. She is an award-winning veteran technology and business journalist with more than two decades of experience in reporting and editing for various publications, including Network Computing, Secure Enterprise ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Why Vulnerable Code Is Shipped Knowingly
Chris Eng, Chief Research Officer, Veracode,  11/30/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win an Amazon Gift Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: I think the boss is bing watching '70s TV shows again!
Current Issue
2021 Top Enterprise IT Trends
We've identified the key trends that are poised to impact the IT landscape in 2021. Find out why they're important and how they will affect you today!
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-5680
PUBLISHED: 2020-12-03
Improper input validation vulnerability in EC-CUBE versions from 3.0.5 to 3.0.18 allows a remote attacker to cause a denial-of-service (DoS) condition via unspecified vector.
CVE-2020-5638
PUBLISHED: 2020-12-03
Cross-site scripting vulnerability in desknet's NEO (desknet's NEO Small License V5.5 R1.5 and earlier, and desknet's NEO Enterprise License V5.5 R1.5 and earlier) allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary script via unspecified vectors.
CVE-2020-5676
PUBLISHED: 2020-12-03
GROWI v4.1.3 and earlier allow remote attackers to obtain information which is not allowed to access via unspecified vectors.
CVE-2020-5677
PUBLISHED: 2020-12-03
Reflected cross-site scripting vulnerability in GROWI v4.0.0 and earlier allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary script via unspecified vectors.
CVE-2020-5678
PUBLISHED: 2020-12-03
Stored cross-site scripting vulnerability in GROWI v3.8.1 and earlier allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary script via unspecified vectors.