Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Risk

12/6/2013
04:33 PM
50%
50%

Experts Offer Advice For Developing Secure Cloud Applications

Research paper offers security advice for application developers for cloud environments

Building security into the application development process has always been a challenge. The reality of cloud computing, however, introduces new hurdles that need to be identified and overcome.

In a new paper, the Cloud Security Alliance (CSA) and the Software Assurance Forum for Excellence in Code (SAFECode) joined forces to help developers navigate the sometimes troubled waters of application security. The report focuses on security considerations for platform-as-a-service (PaaS), though the authors say their advice is relevant to software-as-a-service (SaaS) and infrastructure-as-a-service (IaaS) as well.

"Among all of the cloud security challenges, this report is focused on the challenges faced by software developers who are developing applications for the cloud," says Eric Baize, senior director of the product security office with EMC. "Most of the activities required to develop secure software for the cloud are identical to the fundamental security practices required for any software. However, cloud has some unique characteristics that demand some customization of these practices."

The most notable among these is multi-tenancy, Baize says. Multi-tenancy, the report explains, allows multiple consumers or tenants to maintain a presence in a cloud service provider’s environment in a manner where the computations and data of one tenant are isolated from other tenants.

Cloud providers should model all of their application's interfaces with threats to multi-tenancy in mind, such as information disclosure and privilege escalation, the report advises. In addition, providers should use a "separate schema" database design when building multi-tenant applications as opposed to adding a "TenantID" column to each table.

"APIs are the front door into any application, and it is critical that they are properly secured," the report states. "In many ways, API security for cloud applications is similar to API security for web applications hosted in data centers. Traditional application layer security risks, such as the OWASP Top 10, are still present when deploying your application to the cloud."

To secure APIs, the report recommends determining whether the APIs can be restricted so that only trusted hosts can call them and ensure that interservice communication is securely authenticated. Also, testing should be used to validate security monitoring and alerting capabilities.

The paper touches on a number of other topics as well, including the use of trusted compute pools and the challenges of dealing with authentication and identity management. The focus is on mitigating the primary threats to cloud computing: data breaches, data leakage, denial-of-service, and insecure application interfaces.

The report can be viewed as a set requirements and capabilities that PaaS should be providing to developers, says Steve Orrin, chief technologist for Intel Federal.

"To that end, organizations and their developers need to evaluate the security capabilities and services that their PaaS provides and then ensure they adopt these security capabilities and/or demand their availability from their provider," he says.

Security, Baize adds, has increasingly become an integral part of the design process.

"CSA cloud security recommendations are widely used by cloud practitioners, and SAFECode secure software development practices are increasingly part of standard software engineering processes," he says. "What this report provides is the connection between these two sets of practices by translating cloud-specific security requirements into security practices for software developers."

Have a comment on this story? Please click "Add Your Comment" below. If you'd like to contact Dark Reading's editors directly, send us a message. Brian Prince is a freelance writer for a number of IT security-focused publications. Prior to becoming a freelance reporter, he worked at eWEEK for five years covering not only security, but also a variety of other subjects in the tech industry. Before that, he worked as a ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
US Turning Up the Heat on North Korea's Cyber Threat Operations
Jai Vijayan, Contributing Writer,  9/16/2019
Preventing PTSD and Burnout for Cybersecurity Professionals
Craig Hinkley, CEO, WhiteHat Security,  9/16/2019
NetCAT Vulnerability Is Out of the Bag
Dark Reading Staff 9/12/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
7 Threats & Disruptive Forces Changing the Face of Cybersecurity
This Dark Reading Tech Digest gives an in-depth look at the biggest emerging threats and disruptive forces that are changing the face of cybersecurity today.
Flash Poll
The State of IT Operations and Cybersecurity Operations
The State of IT Operations and Cybersecurity Operations
Your enterprise's cyber risk may depend upon the relationship between the IT team and the security team. Heres some insight on what's working and what isn't in the data center.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-3738
PUBLISHED: 2019-09-18
RSA BSAFE Crypto-J versions prior to 6.2.5 are vulnerable to an Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature vulnerability. A malicious remote attacker could potentially exploit this vulnerability to coerce two parties into computing the same predictable shared key.
CVE-2019-3739
PUBLISHED: 2019-09-18
RSA BSAFE Crypto-J versions prior to 6.2.5 are vulnerable to Information Exposure Through Timing Discrepancy vulnerabilities during ECDSA key generation. A malicious remote attacker could potentially exploit those vulnerabilities to recover ECDSA keys.
CVE-2019-3740
PUBLISHED: 2019-09-18
RSA BSAFE Crypto-J versions prior to 6.2.5 are vulnerable to an Information Exposure Through Timing Discrepancy vulnerabilities during DSA key generation. A malicious remote attacker could potentially exploit those vulnerabilities to recover DSA keys.
CVE-2019-3756
PUBLISHED: 2019-09-18
RSA Archer, versions prior to 6.6 P3 (6.6.0.3), contain an information disclosure vulnerability. Information relating to the backend database gets disclosed to low-privileged RSA Archer users' UI under certain error conditions.
CVE-2019-3758
PUBLISHED: 2019-09-18
RSA Archer, versions prior to 6.6 P2 (6.6.0.2), contain an improper authentication vulnerability. The vulnerability allows sysadmins to create user accounts with insufficient credentials. Unauthenticated attackers could gain unauthorized access to the system using those accounts.