Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Risk

1/16/2008
06:52 AM
Connect Directly
Google+
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Expert: Mac Users Should Gird for Swell of Attacks

Rising popularity of Mac OS X, and of application-layer exploits may end Mac OS's security honeymoon, expert says

Mac users traditionally haven't had to worry much about incident response and forensics. But that is changing fast, with a rise in larger-scale Mac OS X buys and a surge in application-based exploits that span Mac OS X and Windows platforms, according to an incident response expert.

Wendi Whitmore -- a principal consultant with Mandiant who has worked on attack response cases with enterprises, the U.S. Department of Defense, federal law enforcement agencies, and the intelligence community -- says Mac attacks will increase, and it's time for Mac OS X users to be prepared.

"We're going to start seeing a lot more Mac incidents," says Whitmore. "There's this kind of false sense of security that Macs don't get attacked."

Whitmore says with more enterprises and government entities making larger Mac OS X buys, the platform is naturally becoming a more attractive target. "The more of them that are out there, the more the opportunity for attack," she says.

The other red flag is the increasing number of application-based threats that span both Windows and Mac OS X, such as the wave of QuickTime vulnerabilities that have been found and exploited over the past few months, she says. "These are going to be exploitable, regardless of which OS they're on," she says.

Whitmore says she and her colleagues are seeing Macs exploited via Web applications, many of which hit Windows and Mac OS X boxes. "We've recently seen a lot of drive-by attacks, where a user visits seemingly legitimate Websites" that redirect them to a malware-ridden site without their knowledge, she says. These are large news Websites and "mainstream" e-commerce sites, she says.

Aside from the Web app attacks that target browser vulnerabilities, Mac OS X-based Web servers are also getting attacked, typically via automated vulnerability scans looking for weaknesses, she says.

Whitmore, who gave a presentation today on Mac OS X incident response at the DOD's Cyber Crime Conference in St. Louis, says Mac users need to collect so-called "volatile" data and analyze how it fits into the overall attack picture. "Once you've collected that information, you have to start analyzing it to get indicators of whether the compromise was host- or network-based."

Clues can be gleaned from information in filenames or flash files, which allows you to search other hosts for other compromised systems, she says. Check memory processes, network connections, running processes, and open files, for instance. Consult system logs. (These these steps, of course, aren't unique to Mac OS X, Whitmore says.)

It's not that attackers are necessarily always targeting a Mac box when it gets hit: In one Web server attack, for instance, Whitmore says she and other investigators found the attacker was just looking for application vulnerabilities to exploit, not specifically a Mac server. "We were able prove the attacker didn't even know this was a Mac server or OS when he compromised it," she says.

One problem in some organizations with a mix of OSes is that their systems administrators and other IT people may not be as well-versed in Mac OS X, so not all of their organizations' policies get applied to the boxes, Whitmore notes. "You should apply the same password and admin policies to Mac OS 10 as you do to Windows."

Have a comment on this story? Please click "Discuss" below. If you'd like to contact Dark Reading's editors directly, send us a message.

  • Apple Inc. (Nasdaq: AAPL)
  • Mandiant

    Kelly Jackson Higgins is the Executive Editor of Dark Reading. She is an award-winning veteran technology and business journalist with more than two decades of experience in reporting and editing for various publications, including Network Computing, Secure Enterprise ... View Full Bio
     

    Recommended Reading:

    Comment  | 
    Print  | 
    More Insights
  • Comments
    Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
    COVID-19: Latest Security News & Commentary
    Dark Reading Staff 6/5/2020
    Abandoned Apps May Pose Security Risk to Mobile Devices
    Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  5/29/2020
    How AI and Automation Can Help Bridge the Cybersecurity Talent Gap
    Peter Barker, Chief Product Officer at ForgeRock,  6/1/2020
    Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
    White Papers
    Video
    Cartoon Contest
    Write a Caption, Win a Starbucks Card! Click Here
    Latest Comment: What? IT said I needed virus protection!
    Current Issue
    How Cybersecurity Incident Response Programs Work (and Why Some Don't)
    This Tech Digest takes a look at the vital role cybersecurity incident response (IR) plays in managing cyber-risk within organizations. Download the Tech Digest today to find out how well-planned IR programs can detect intrusions, contain breaches, and help an organization restore normal operations.
    Flash Poll
    Twitter Feed
    Dark Reading - Bug Report
    Bug Report
    Enterprise Vulnerabilities
    From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
    CVE-2020-13842
    PUBLISHED: 2020-06-05
    An issue was discovered on LG mobile devices with Android OS 7.2, 8.0, 8.1, 9, and 10 (MTK chipsets). A dangerous AT command was made available even though it is unused. The LG ID is LVE-SMP-200010 (June 2020).
    CVE-2020-13843
    PUBLISHED: 2020-06-05
    An issue was discovered on LG mobile devices with Android OS software before 2020-06-01. Local users can cause a denial of service because checking of the userdata partition is mishandled. The LG ID is LVE-SMP-200014 (June 2020).
    CVE-2020-13839
    PUBLISHED: 2020-06-05
    An issue was discovered on LG mobile devices with Android OS 7.2, 8.0, 8.1, 9, and 10 (MTK chipsets). Code execution can occur via a custom AT command handler buffer overflow. The LG ID is LVE-SMP-200007 (June 2020).
    CVE-2020-13840
    PUBLISHED: 2020-06-05
    An issue was discovered on LG mobile devices with Android OS 7.2, 8.0, 8.1, 9, and 10 (MTK chipsets). Code execution can occur via an MTK AT command handler buffer overflow. The LG ID is LVE-SMP-200008 (June 2020).
    CVE-2020-13841
    PUBLISHED: 2020-06-05
    An issue was discovered on LG mobile devices with Android OS 9 and 10 (MTK chipsets). An AT command handler allows attackers to bypass intended access restrictions. The LG ID is LVE-SMP-200009 (June 2020).