Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Risk

11/15/2009
07:32 PM
Connect Directly
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

DNSSEC Rollout Gains Traction

VeriSign updates its plans for .com and .net DNSSEC adoption, and new survey from Infoblox shows DNSSEC getting a big bump over the past year

More signs that DNSSEC implementation is making inroads: The number of DNSSEC-signed zones has increased 300 percent over last year, according to a new survey, and VeriSign today announced its launch of a "boot camp" program to assist registrars, ISPs, and large registrants in deploying DNSSEC.

VeriSign also gave more definitive dates for the completion of DNSSEC adoption for the .net domain -- fourth quarter of 2010 -- and .com by the first quarter of 2011.

The massive .com and .net Internet domains are the last to deploy DNSSEC. The .org domain is already DNSSEC-signed, federal agencies must adopt DNSSEC by December for their .gov domains, and new FISMA regulations call for agencies to sign their intranet zones with DNSSEC by the middle of next year. The .edu domain is currently implementing DNSSEC.

VeriSign, which has worked with EDUCAUSE to deploy DNSSEC in the .edu academic community, says it has also set up an interoperability lab for DNSSEC vendors to test their products.

Meanwhile, a new DNS survey by Infoblox that was also released today demonstrates just how much momentum the DNSSEC security protocol for DNS is finally enjoying after nearly 15 years in the works. The survey found that signed zones rose from 45 last year to 167 this year.

"As part of the infrastructure side, we are doing everything we can do with DNSSEC," says Cricket Liu, vice president of architecture for Infoblox and author of several DNS books. "Every major top-level domain has...commenced [its implementation]. We're setting the stage, and it's going quite well."

DNSSEC finally started to catch on earlier last year in the wake of concerns over how to defend against the DNS cache-poisoning flaw discovered by Dan Kaminsky. The .gov and .org top-level domains have begun to adopt the Domain Name Service (DNS) security protocol, and .edu has been under way recently, as well.

But security experts say having the .com and .net top-level domains signed with DNSSEC will go a long way in protecting DNS servers. The big missing link still to come, however, is signing the root zone DNS servers. Then the entire DNS process, from root to authoritative name server, will get the full power of DNSSEC.

DNSSEC uses public key cryptography to digitally sign DNS data. That protects DNS queries and responses from cache poisoning, redirects to phishing sites, and man-in-the-middle attacks. A DNSSEC-signed DNS response verifies that it's legitimate.

"When you send a DNS query to an authoritative name server that's DNSSEC-enabled, you get a response with key information and a signature that authenticates that you got the response from the server you thought you were querying," says Joe Waldron, director of product management for naming services at VeriSign. "It ensures the information has not been tampered with or corrupted."

While DNSSEC goes a long way in protecting DNS servers, it's just one layer of security needed to beef up Internet security, security experts say. "DNSSEC does not solve many of the most common threats to Internet security. This is why other layers of protection, such as Extended Validation SSL certificates and two-factor authentication, are so critical to making the Internet secure for everyone," said Ken Silva, CTO of VeriSign, in a statement.

Infoblox's Liu says while DNSSEC is making headway, there's still a long way to go. "I would hope that as all the parent zones are signed, you'll start to see real acceleration of DNSSEC," he says.

Meanwhile, organizations should start getting ready to adopt DNSSEC. "They ought to gear up and do validation after the root zone is signed," he says. "When the root zone is signed, it becomes incumbent on us to digitally validate data once it's easy to do. Any organization not signing their external zones should at least plan for validation of signed data."

The Infoblox survey also found that 79.6 percent of the DNS name servers in its random sample are open to recursion -- up from 52.1 percent in 2007. Recursive servers can be abused for distributed denial-of-service attacks, Liu says.

VeriSign's Waldron says widely deploying DNSSEC is a complex process. "It touches the entire DNS infrastructure. It affects ISPs, registrars, registries, and end-user domain name holders," he says. "We want to learn lessons from registries that are in the process of DNSSEC or have signed their zones."

Have a comment on this story? Please click "Discuss" below. If you'd like to contact Dark Reading's editors directly, send us a message.

Kelly Jackson Higgins is the Executive Editor of Dark Reading. She is an award-winning veteran technology and business journalist with more than two decades of experience in reporting and editing for various publications, including Network Computing, Secure Enterprise ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Commentary
Ransomware Is Not the Problem
Adam Shostack, Consultant, Entrepreneur, Technologist, Game Designer,  6/9/2021
Edge-DRsplash-11-edge-ask-the-experts
How Can I Test the Security of My Home-Office Employees' Routers?
John Bock, Senior Research Scientist,  6/7/2021
News
New Ransomware Group Claiming Connection to REvil Gang Surfaces
Jai Vijayan, Contributing Writer,  6/10/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win an Amazon Gift Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: This comment is waiting for review by our moderators.
Current Issue
The State of Cybersecurity Incident Response
In this report learn how enterprises are building their incident response teams and processes, how they research potential compromises, how they respond to new breaches, and what tools and processes they use to remediate problems and improve their cyber defenses for the future.
Flash Poll
How Enterprises are Developing Secure Applications
How Enterprises are Developing Secure Applications
Recent breaches of third-party apps are driving many organizations to think harder about the security of their off-the-shelf software as they continue to move left in secure software development practices.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2021-20027
PUBLISHED: 2021-06-14
A buffer overflow vulnerability in SonicOS allows a remote attacker to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) by sending a specially crafted request. This vulnerability affects SonicOS Gen5, Gen6, Gen7 platforms, and SonicOSv virtual firewalls.
CVE-2021-32684
PUBLISHED: 2021-06-14
magento-scripts contains scripts and configuration used by Create Magento App, a zero-configuration tool-chain which allows one to deploy Magento 2. In versions 1.5.1 and 1.5.2, after changing the function from synchronous to asynchronous there wasn't implemented handler in the start, stop, exec, an...
CVE-2021-34693
PUBLISHED: 2021-06-14
net/can/bcm.c in the Linux kernel through 5.12.10 allows local users to obtain sensitive information from kernel stack memory because parts of a data structure are uninitialized.
CVE-2021-27887
PUBLISHED: 2021-06-14
Cross-site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the main dashboard of Ellipse APM versions allows an authenticated user or integrated application to inject malicious data into the application that can then be executed in a victim’s browser. This issue affects: Hitachi ABB Power Grids ...
CVE-2021-27196
PUBLISHED: 2021-06-14
Improper Input Validation vulnerability in Hitachi ABB Power Grids Relion 670 Series, Relion 670/650 Series, Relion 670/650/SAM600-IO, Relion 650, REB500, RTU500 Series, FOX615 (TEGO1), MSM, GMS600, PWC600 allows an attacker with access to the IEC 61850 network with knowledge of how to reproduce the...