Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Endpoint

3/28/2012
12:54 PM
Connect Directly
Google+
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Deja Vu: Reincarnated Botnet Struck Down

Researchers at Kaspersky Lab, CrowdStrike, and Dell SecureWorks intercept bots from infamous spamming botnet -- but this time without the help of Microsoft and its legal team

The hard-to-kill Kelihos/Hlux botnet -- now in its second and much larger version -- was crippled and shut down over the past few days by a team of researchers from Kaspersky Lab, CrowdStrike, Dell SecureWorks, and The Honeynet Project.

The researchers announced today that they had wrested control of the botnet, the descendent of the infamous Storm botnet, by poisoning the peer-to-peer network-based botnet with their own code, which ultimately diverted some 110,000 infected machines to their sinkhole server and out of the hands of the botnet operators.

Kelihos/Hlux (a.k.a. Hlux/Kelihos), which was taken down in the fall by Microsoft, Kaspersky, and researchers from several other organizations, had been spotted by researchers re-emerging over the past few months with a new version of its malware. The so-called Hlux.B/Kelihos.B, also a peer-to-peer botnet, was built for spamming, information-stealing, and some DDoS activity like its predecessors, but also came with an new function -- stealing Bitcoins and electronic wallets, as well as a flash-drive infection capability, according to the researchers. It was about three times as large as the first Hlux/Kelihos botnet.

But this time, Microsoft and its legal team weren't part of the operation. Kaspersky and CrowdStrike did not explain why, but acknowledged that they did not use legal force this time around. Microsoft has been on an aggressive litigation-based campaign against botnets during the past year, with its latest conquest of a massive Zeus botnet operation it announced earlier this week that allowed the software giant to physically seize command-and-control (C&C) servers.

"We commend Kaspersky and their industry partners for their action against the new Kelihos.b botnet. There is clearly a strong momentum happening in the fight against botnets. Cybercriminals should take recent disruptive events as a clear warning that private industry, law enforcement and the security community are on the move and it’s time for criminals to find a different, legitimate line of business," said Richard Boscovich, senior attorney in the Microsoft Digital Crimes Unit, in a statement.

Some security experts question whether the nonlegal route taken this time will be as effective, and there's still the bigger problem of not capturing the bad guys behind the botnet. The alleged botmaster, Andrey N. Sabelnikov, who was named in a legal filing by Microsoft, remains at large. Microsoft says Sabelnikov lives in St. Petersburg, Russia, is a contractor for a software development and consulting firm, and once worked as a software engineer and project manager at a firewall and antivirus firm, which was later identified in press reports as Agnitum.

Security experts agree that dismantling botnets is a game of whack-a-mole unless the bad guys are caught. "Taking down a botnet without capturing the bot masters/herders and malware authors is essentially the same as seizing guns from criminals without any arrests. A criminal can always find more guns," says Jerry Tubbs, CTO of Unveillance, which provides botnet and data-leakage monitoring services for enterprises.

And Kaspersky and CrowdStrike researchers do expect the criminals behind Hlux/Kelihos to keep trying to reinvent their botnet operation. "We can say we expect to see a new version as well," said Tillman Werner, senior research scientist at CrowdStrike, in a press briefing today detailing the latest takedown.

Hlux.B/Kelihos.B was designed to encrypt HTTP and Port 80 C&C traffic, and two layers of obfuscation for its binary code. Like previous versions, it uses a sophisticated layered architecture that keeps the botnet operators well-hidden, as well as the C&C servers. "It's a fairly complex architecture," Werner said.

So how did the researchers take down the botnet? "We have injected false information into the botnet ... fake job server lists that all pointed to our sinkhole machine, which then talks to the bots and makes sure they can't talk to [any other botnet]," Tillman said.

This botnet is known for its relative size, prolific spamming capabilities, as well as its staying power: It's technically in its fifth version, and it has a long history of being hunted and reinventing itself. It started out as the massive Storm botnet back in 2007, which later was replaced by Waledac (later taken down by researchers), then a short-lived Storm2 that was snuffed out before it got off the ground, and, most recently, the Kelihos/Hlux versions. What set this latest version apart is that it about five times bigger than the previous Kelihos version, and with its Bitcoin-stealing features, is not just for spamming and DDoSing anymore.

Most of the victims were in Poland, which had about one-fourth of the bots, followed by the U.S. (10.8 percent), Turkey (5 percent), Spain (3.7 percent), India (3.4 percent), Argentina (3.1 percent), Mexico (3.1 percent), Romania (2.9 percent), Bulgaria (2.6 percent), and the Ukraine (2.5 percent). The bulk of the infected machines were Windows XP-based, with 91,950 infections, followed by Windows 7, with 9,428, and Windows 7 SP1, with 5,335 infections.

Next Page: The botnet operators fight back Kelly Jackson Higgins is the Executive Editor of Dark Reading. She is an award-winning veteran technology and business journalist with more than two decades of experience in reporting and editing for various publications, including Network Computing, Secure Enterprise ... View Full Bio

Previous
1 of 2
Next
Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Zero-Factor Authentication: Owning Our Data
Nick Selby, Chief Security Officer at Paxos Trust Company,  2/19/2020
44% of Security Threats Start in the Cloud
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  2/19/2020
Ransomware Damage Hit $11.5B in 2019
Dark Reading Staff 2/20/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
6 Emerging Cyber Threats That Enterprises Face in 2020
This Tech Digest gives an in-depth look at six emerging cyber threats that enterprises could face in 2020. Download your copy today!
Flash Poll
How Enterprises Are Developing and Maintaining Secure Applications
How Enterprises Are Developing and Maintaining Secure Applications
The concept of application security is well known, but application security testing and remediation processes remain unbalanced. Most organizations are confident in their approach to AppSec, although others seem to have no approach at all. Read this report to find out more.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2014-7914
PUBLISHED: 2020-02-21
btif/src/btif_dm.c in Android before 5.1 does not properly enforce the temporary nature of a Bluetooth pairing, which allows user-assisted remote attackers to bypass intended access restrictions via crafted Bluetooth packets after the tapping of a crafted NFC tag.
CVE-2016-4606
PUBLISHED: 2020-02-21
Curl before 7.49.1 in Apple OS X before macOS Sierra prior to 10.12 allows remote or local attackers to execute arbitrary code, gain sensitive information, cause denial-of-service conditions, bypass security restrictions, and perform unauthorized actions. This may aid in other attacks.
CVE-2020-5243
PUBLISHED: 2020-02-21
uap-core before 0.7.3 is vulnerable to a denial of service attack when processing crafted User-Agent strings. Some regexes are vulnerable to regular expression denial of service (REDoS) due to overlapping capture groups. This allows remote attackers to overload a server by setting the User-Agent hea...
CVE-2019-14688
PUBLISHED: 2020-02-20
Trend Micro has repackaged installers for several Trend Micro products that were found to utilize a version of an install package that had a DLL hijack vulnerability that could be exploited during a new product installation. The vulnerability was found to ONLY be exploitable during an initial produc...
CVE-2019-19694
PUBLISHED: 2020-02-20
The Trend Micro Security 2019 (15.0.0.1163 and below) consumer family of products is vulnerable to a denial of service (DoS) attack in which a malicious actor could manipulate a key file at a certain time during the system startup process to disable the product's malware protection functions or the ...