Risk

5/24/2017
02:00 PM
Peter Merkulov
Peter Merkulov
Commentary
Connect Directly
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Google+
RSS
E-Mail vvv
50%
50%

Data Security & Privacy: The Risks of Not Playing by the Rules

Achieving compliance is a complex and challenging process. But with the right systems and policies, you can stay ahead of the next data breach - and the regulators.

Data protection and privacy regulations affect organizations of every stripe. Whatever your business, if you have customers or employees, you have data that requires protection under some state or federal mandate. Such regulations are intended to ensure that proper precautions have been taken to protect potential victims of digital crimes such as fraud or identity theft stemming from malicious actors gaining access to data through hacking, technical malfunction, or human error.

It’s important to note before any discussion of regulatory compliance begins that following the rules doesn’t guarantee your systems and data will remain secure. As the saying goes, "compliance is a floor, not a ceiling," and so meeting the minimum standards under the law should be regarded as a starting point. Where you take your information security program from there depends on your industry, the kinds of data your organization deals with and its appetite for risk.

Data security and privacy regulations make up an expanding landscape comprising a long, overlapping and often confusing alphabet soup of laws and standards like HIPAA, SOX, FCRA, GLBA, PCI DSS, GDPR, PIPEDA, and others. Security and risk-management decision-makers must understand the nature of these laws and set security strategies accordingly or suffer the consequences of falling short of their demands. It’s not an easy task, but it is a manageable one when broken into its parts.

The first step involves recognizing the ways (apart from blatantly ignoring the regulations) an organization might inadvertently fall outside the bounds of compliance.

3 Conditions that Can Compromise Compliance

  1. Shadow IT: The most common conditions that can compromise a compliance program are the use and proliferation of so-called shadow IT (technologies that operate within the enterprise outside the purview of IT management); a failure to document compliance processes or enforce existing processes; and a lack of visibility into the means of collecting, managing, and storing data.
  2. Change: There will likely be gaps in even the most rigorous of compliance programs, especially since compliance is a dynamic, ever-evolving endeavor. Laws change, technology changes, the threat environment changes, and so processes must change in response. Data management that includes security policies, training and awareness programs, technology maintenance, and regular systems and response testing is required. “Set it and forget it” is not a real option.
  3. Non-compliance: The direct and indirect consequences of non-compliance can be unforgiving, exacting steep costs of time, resources, and reputation that can cripple an organization.

6 Consequences of Non-Compliance
Non-compliance means your organization is at greater risk of a data breach, and a data breach can come with a steep financial cost. Here are six ways a non-compliant organization might suffer in the event of a data breach:

  1. Lawsuits: A data breach doesn’t only affect the breached organization, but may also put at risk the associated employees, consumers, customers, partners, and service providers—any of which may decide to take legal action seeking justice and protection. Win or lose, a lawsuit can be an expensive proposition.
  2. Bank Fines: If credit card data is affected, banks may end up re-issuing new cards to their customers. When that happens and the banks incur associated costs, they will likely seek to recoup those costs from the organization whose breach prompted the action by levying fines or added fees.
  3. Governmental Audits: Any egregious breach of consumer data risks action by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) acting on behalf of U.S. consumers. If the organization was found to be out of compliance and negligent, the FTC may not only fine the company, but also require expensive annual compliance audits for years the following the negligent behavior.
  4. Compensation and Remediation Costs: Among the many costs involved with a security failure are those associated with forensic investigations to determine the source and cause of the breach, fix the gaps that were exploited, and address any residual risk to consumers and others. Someone has to pay for free credit monitoring services, after all.
  5. Lost Revenue: A data breach may cause customers to lose trust in the affected organization. When that happens there’s a good chance that they will take their business elsewhere. Following a breach affecting 70 million customers in 2014, retail giant Target saw profits fall by $440 million the following quarter.
  6. Lost Reputation: When word of a data breach gets out, loss of reputation soon follows. In order to mend fences with all affected parties, organizations will incur costs associated with increased marketing, communications, and public relations campaigns. As the saying goes, a good reputation takes years to gain—but a moment to lose. 

3 Ways Data Management Matters
Given the risk of failure, it’s important to implement a strong data management program as a part of an organization’s security and compliance strategy. If you don’t know what data you have, where it’s stored, who has access, and how it is used, it’s impossible to keep it secure—and to prove compliance. Data management provides a framework for understanding how information moves through the enterprise. Here’s how data management helps with security and compliance:

  1. Workflow and Process Automation: Human error continues to be one of the weakest links in the security chain. Workflow and process automation remove the human factor from many tasks that might otherwise be vulnerable. Automating processes associated with vital applications and services, and doing so while the organization’s security and compliance functions operate in the background, lets users focus on their jobs while giving management greater peace of mind.
  2. Centralized Control and Visibility: Not knowing what’s happening in your network is unsettling — and can mean the enterprise is at risk of a breach. As networks grow more complex and as perimeters expand to include mobile devices, the cloud and more, IT administrators need even greater levels of transparency into the network in order to gain a top-down view of the infrastructure that’s required to achieve compliance and mitigate other security and performance risks.
  3. Custom Compliance Profiles and Reporting: Every organization has its own set of regulatory expectations and challenges based on industry, size, risk appetite, and a thousand other factors. One-size-fits-all doesn’t apply; specialized compliance tools offering customized data workflows and configurations ensure that, whether facing PCI DSS, HIPAA, SOX or some combination of these and other regulations, a tailored profile and reporting structure is needed.

Achieving compliance is a complex and challenging process, but with the right systems and a strong, customized data management policy, your organization will be positioned to stay ahead of the next data breach — and the regulators. 

Related Content:

 

Peter Merkulov serves as vice president of product strategy and technology alliances at Globalscape. He is responsible for leading and overseeing the product strategy, product management, product marketing, and technology alliances teams. Merkulov has over 15 years of ... View Full Bio
Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
CloudMaskWael
50%
50%
CloudMaskWael,
User Rank: Apprentice
5/28/2017 | 11:25:38 AM
Dynamic Data Maskin
What is the solution in the world where our adversaries are stronger than us? we need to protect our data not just the access to the data. Today, the rules do not list data masking as a requirement or as a layer to be considered. #cloudmask  
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
Dark Reading Live EVENTS
INsecurity - For the Defenders of Enterprise Security
A Dark Reading Conference
While red team conferences focus primarily on new vulnerabilities and security researchers, INsecurity puts security execution, protection, and operations center stage. The primary speakers will be CISOs and leaders in security defense; the blue team will be the focus.
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win a Starbucks Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: Darn - typed UNICORN instead of UNICODE.  
Current Issue
Security Vulnerabilities: The Next Wave
Just when you thought it was safe, researchers have unveiled a new round of IT security flaws. Is your enterprise ready?
Flash Poll
[Strategic Security Report] How Enterprises Are Attacking the IT Security Problem
[Strategic Security Report] How Enterprises Are Attacking the IT Security Problem
Enterprises are spending more of their IT budgets on cybersecurity technology. How do your organization's security plans and strategies compare to what others are doing? Here's an in-depth look.
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2017-0290
Published: 2017-05-09
NScript in mpengine in Microsoft Malware Protection Engine with Engine Version before 1.1.13704.0, as used in Windows Defender and other products, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service (type confusion and application crash) via crafted JavaScript code within ...

CVE-2016-10369
Published: 2017-05-08
unixsocket.c in lxterminal through 0.3.0 insecurely uses /tmp for a socket file, allowing a local user to cause a denial of service (preventing terminal launch), or possibly have other impact (bypassing terminal access control).

CVE-2016-8202
Published: 2017-05-08
A privilege escalation vulnerability in Brocade Fibre Channel SAN products running Brocade Fabric OS (FOS) releases earlier than v7.4.1d and v8.0.1b could allow an authenticated attacker to elevate the privileges of user accounts accessing the system via command line interface. With affected version...

CVE-2016-8209
Published: 2017-05-08
Improper checks for unusual or exceptional conditions in Brocade NetIron 05.8.00 and later releases up to and including 06.1.00, when the Management Module is continuously scanned on port 22, may allow attackers to cause a denial of service (crash and reload) of the management module.

CVE-2017-0890
Published: 2017-05-08
Nextcloud Server before 11.0.3 is vulnerable to an inadequate escaping leading to a XSS vulnerability in the search module. To be exploitable a user has to write or paste malicious content into the search dialogue.