Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Risk

1/31/2013
12:39 AM
50%
50%

Data Loss Prevention? There's A Service For That

Companies have started offering pay-as-you-go services for data loss prevention to reduce the complexity and the upfront costs

More than a decade ago, companies looked to protect their perimeters to keep attackers out. Regular breaches forced companies to implement defense-in-depth measures, monitoring and protecting their networks and systems. Then the increasing use of mobile devices and cloud services had businesses looking at tracking and protecting the data itself.

For many corporations, protecting their trade secrets and intellectual property means implementing a data loss prevention (DLP) program -- encrypting the information, tracking when it leaves the company firewall, and alerting information-technology managers when users attempt to violate policy. Yet deploying and managing the technology is not easy, says Bill Munroe, vice president of marketing for data-security firm Verdasys. Typically, companies need a strong technical security team to keep DLP systems running.

Instead, some companies are turning to managed service providers or cloud services to help them quickly deploy the systems quickly and manage the policies more easily. Verdasys has eight customers, totaling 40,000 users, currently piloting its own cloud-based DLP service, Munroe says.

"The majority of customers have two or three or four security people, and they've looked at DLP in the past, but there was no way to do it," he says. "So they had no true data protections beyond some hard controls."

To deploy the technology, a customer just signs up and downloads software agents to each device to be protected. On average, a company takes about two weeks to get up and running on the Managed Service for Information Protection (MSIP) service, Munroe says. Companies pay anywhere from $6 per user per month for just monitoring data usage to $14 per user per month for user notification and encrypted file and e-mail services.

Customers not only escape the headaches of deploying and managing a DLP service, but also benefit from other customers' experiences. For example, signs of malware exfiltrating data can be added to the policies for the rest of the customer base.

[DLP isn't strictly a security project -- it's part of a broad data protection program that demands a co-existence of people and process with technology. See Tech Insight: Making Data Leak Prevention Work In The Enterprise.]

Verdasys is not alone in attempting to bring the benefits of the cloud service architecture to its customers. Last year, managed-service provider BEW Global announced a hybrid cloud solution, which used on-premise appliances to analyze enterprise data and cloud-based analysis and management.

Symantec, a major manufacturer of DLP technology, has seen a great deal of interest, as well. At the company's Vision user conference last year, Symantec offered a session on letting providers manage companies' DLP infrastructure. A standing-room-only crowd packed the room, says Robert Hamilton, director of product marketing of Symantec's DLP group.

Still, many companies are hesitant to expose any of their sensitive data to the cloud, he says.

"As we see companies moving to the cloud, it's a challenge to convince them to move their DLP into the cloud because the system handles the most sensitive information that a company has," he says.

Moreover, large companies that have a dozen or more members on their security teams may want to keep their DLP systems inside their network.

"The hardest thing about offering this as a service is getting the company comfortable," says Verdasys' Munroe, who added that most companies quickly acclimate when they see which data is leaving their perimeter. "It usually doesn't take more than a few weeks for us to find data leaving."

Have a comment on this story? Please click "Add Your Comment" below. If you'd like to contact Dark Reading's editors directly, send us a message.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Bryan Yurcan
50%
50%
Bryan Yurcan,
User Rank: Apprentice
1/31/2013 | 6:50:36 PM
re: Data Loss Prevention? There's A Service For That
Munroe's last comment seems very true, many companies are reluctant to adopt cloud services for these kinds of things, will be an interesting trend to follow
Manchester United Suffers Cyberattack
Dark Reading Staff 11/23/2020
As 'Anywhere Work' Evolves, Security Will Be Key Challenge
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  11/23/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win an Amazon Gift Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: This comment is waiting for review by our moderators.
Current Issue
2021 Top Enterprise IT Trends
We've identified the key trends that are poised to impact the IT landscape in 2021. Find out why they're important and how they will affect you today!
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-29144
PUBLISHED: 2020-11-27
In Ericsson BSCS iX R18 Billing & Rating iX R18, MX is a web base module in BSCS iX that is vulnerable to stored XSS via an Alert Dashboard comment. In most test cases, session hijacking was also possible by utilizing the XSS vulnerability. This potentially allows for full account takeover, or e...
CVE-2020-29145
PUBLISHED: 2020-11-27
In Ericsson BSCS iX R18 Billing & Rating iX R18, ADMX is a web base module in BSCS iX that is vulnerable to stored XSS via the name or description field to a solutionUnitServlet?SuName=UserReferenceDataSU Access Rights Group. In most test cases, session hijacking was also possible by utilizing t...
CVE-2020-29136
PUBLISHED: 2020-11-27
In cPanel before 90.0.17, 2FA can be bypassed via a brute-force approach (SEC-575).
CVE-2020-29137
PUBLISHED: 2020-11-27
cPanel before 90.0.17 allows self-XSS via the WHM Transfer Tool interface (SEC-577).
CVE-2020-29135
PUBLISHED: 2020-11-27
cPanel before 90.0.17 has multiple instances of URL parameter injection (SEC-567).