Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Endpoint

4/18/2013
03:26 PM
Connect Directly
Google+
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Consumers Want Biometrics, Survey Finds

New Ponemon Institute study shows disillusionment and problems with passwords in online transactions

Most consumers support biometrics for authentication, with voice recognition, facial, and fingerprint scans as their top identity verification methods.

They're also getting frustrated with passwords, with half of them having frequently been unable to conduct an online transaction due to an authentication failure on the website, according to a new survey by The Ponemon Institute and commissioned by Nok Nok Labs. Most of these problems were due to forgotten passwords, usernames, or answers to their preset security questions. Some 60 percent say they would prefer a single, multipurpose identity credential for online and physical access.

But like with most security issues, it's a delicate balance between convenience and actual security: Forty-eight percent don't trust websites or systems that rely solely on passwords, and nearly 40 percent say they don't trust financial service sites that don't require frequent password changes. But they are also tired of password and authentication failures on sites, with less than 50 percent saying authentication failures happen due to problems on the website themselves.

"It seems that people don't have a high degree of trust [with passwords], but they still use" them for online transactions, says Larry Ponemon, chairman and founder of The Ponemon Institute. "And convenience is important: They don't want to remember multiple, complex and long passwords."

The study polled some 1,900 consumers ages 18 to 65 in the U.S., U.K., and Germany, who spent at least 10 hours per week online and conducting online commerce, social networking, and blogging.

Nearly 70 percent of the respondents say that in the past two years they have forgotten one of their passwords because it was too long or complex to retain, and 61 percent were locked out of an online account due to an authentication failure of some sort in the past two years. Some 54 percent of U.S. consumers say it takes too long to reset a password.

"In general, we find folks like multipurpose credentials that would be used for many things because it's more convenient," Ponemon says. "Sixty-three percent would consider or prefer multipurpose credentials."

But the biggest surprise of the survey was how consumers now consider biometrics as an authentication option. Nearly 70 percent of U.S. consumers say biometrics is a viable authentication option. "Five or six years ago, it was no biometrics," says Phillip Dunkelberger, former CEO of PGP and now CEO of startup Nok Nok Labs.

Less than one-third of U.S. and U.K. respondents were against biometrics, with about one-fourth of Germans rejecting the method of authentication. Most support biometrics with "trusted organizations" such as banks, credit card firms, healthcare providers, email providers, or government agencies. Around one-third of consumers in each of the three regions say biometrics would only be acceptable to them if their biometric data was not accessible to the organization they are authenticating to. Voice recognition was by far the most preferred biometric, with 83 to 91 percent of the consumers in favor of it for authentication. Facial scans was next, with 65 to 72 percent of consumers, followed by fingerprints, with 56 to 62 percent of consumers. About half of U.S. and U.K. consumers say iris scanning is acceptable to them, while 66 percent of Germans are in favor of iris scanning biometrics.

The "Moving Beyond Passwords: Consumer Attitudes on Online Authentication" report is available here (PDF) for download.

Have a comment on this story? Please click "Add Your Comment" below. If you'd like to contact Dark Reading's editors directly, send us a message.

Kelly Jackson Higgins is the Executive Editor of Dark Reading. She is an award-winning veteran technology and business journalist with more than two decades of experience in reporting and editing for various publications, including Network Computing, Secure Enterprise ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
CurtisNeeley
50%
50%
CurtisNeeley,
User Rank: Apprentice
4/25/2013 | 7:04:57 PM
re: Consumers Want Biometrics, Survey Finds
How about printing a number on the forehead that allows forehead prints to be used much the way fingerprints or facial recognition works. lets say something like 222 or 333?
COVID-19: Latest Security News & Commentary
Dark Reading Staff 9/17/2020
Cybersecurity Bounces Back, but Talent Still Absent
Simone Petrella, Chief Executive Officer, CyberVista,  9/16/2020
Meet the Computer Scientist Who Helped Push for Paper Ballots
Kelly Jackson Higgins, Executive Editor at Dark Reading,  9/16/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
Special Report: Computing's New Normal
This special report examines how IT security organizations have adapted to the "new normal" of computing and what the long-term effects will be. Read it and get a unique set of perspectives on issues ranging from new threats & vulnerabilities as a result of remote working to how enterprise security strategy will be affected long term.
Flash Poll
How IT Security Organizations are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
How IT Security Organizations are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
The COVID-19 pandemic turned the world -- and enterprise computing -- on end. Here's a look at how cybersecurity teams are retrenching their defense strategies, rebuilding their teams, and selecting new technologies to stop the oncoming rise of online attacks.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-5421
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-19
In Spring Framework versions 5.2.0 - 5.2.8, 5.1.0 - 5.1.17, 5.0.0 - 5.0.18, 4.3.0 - 4.3.28, and older unsupported versions, the protections against RFD attacks from CVE-2015-5211 may be bypassed depending on the browser used through the use of a jsessionid path parameter.
CVE-2020-8225
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-18
A cleartext storage of sensitive information in Nextcloud Desktop Client 2.6.4 gave away information about used proxies and their authentication credentials.
CVE-2020-8237
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-18
Prototype pollution in json-bigint npm package < 1.0.0 may lead to a denial-of-service (DoS) attack.
CVE-2020-8245
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-18
Improper Input Validation on Citrix ADC and Citrix Gateway 13.0 before 13.0-64.35, Citrix ADC and NetScaler Gateway 12.1 before 12.1-58.15, Citrix ADC 12.1-FIPS before 12.1-55.187, Citrix ADC and NetScaler Gateway 12.0, Citrix ADC and NetScaler Gateway 11.1 before 11.1-65.12, Citrix SD-WAN WANOP 11....
CVE-2020-8246
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-18
Citrix ADC and Citrix Gateway 13.0 before 13.0-64.35, Citrix ADC and NetScaler Gateway 12.1 before 12.1-58.15, Citrix ADC 12.1-FIPS before 12.1-55.187, Citrix ADC and NetScaler Gateway 12.0, Citrix ADC and NetScaler Gateway 11.1 before 11.1-65.12, Citrix SD-WAN WANOP 11.2 before 11.2.1a, Citrix SD-W...