Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Risk

Companies May Be Held Liable for Deals With Terrorists, ID Thieves

New and little-known regulations could mean fines, or even jail time, for companies that do business with bad guys

OK, pop quiz. A local car dealership sells a car to a new customer. A week later, that same automobile is used in a terrorist car bombing. The business can't be held liable for what the customer did, right?

Wrong, according to several U.S. law enforcement agencies. In fact, if your company provides products or services to a terrorist or identity thief, it may face six-figure fines -- or even jail time for its officers.

"With all of the focus put on compliance and security breaches, it's easy to overlook these requirements around identity and law enforcement," notes Brian Bradley, executive vice president of strategy and emerging markets at MicroBilt, which vets customers and trading partners on behalf of its small-business clients. "It's another level of compliance that a lot of companies don't even know about."

If you're a security pro, you might be familiar with the U.S. Treasury Department's Office of Foreign Asset Control (OFAC) requirements, which basically require companies to check their customers' identities against a list of known terrorists to prevent them from unwittingly providing products or services to an enemy. Most major credit bureaus check customers and applicants against these lists, so if you're vetting your partners and customers that way, you're probably covered.

However, you may not have heard yet about the Federal Trade Commission's "Red Flag" program, which is designed to warn companies when they are about to do business with identity thieves or money-laundering operations. The Red Flag program, which takes effect Nov. 1, requires enterprises to check their customers and suppliers against databases of known online criminals -- much like what OFAC does with terrorists -- and also carries potential fines and penalties for businesses that don't do their due diligence before making a major transaction.

"The final rules require each financial institution and creditor that holds any consumer account, or other account for which there is a reasonably foreseeable risk of identity theft, to develop and implement an Identity Theft Prevention Program for combating identity theft in connection with new and existing accounts," the FTC says in the rules, which were passed last year.

"The Red Flag rules are basically there to help protect consumers from identity fraud, and to help prevent businesses from making bad loans or extending credit to criminals," Bradley says. "But a lot of security people don't know much about them yet, and most small businesses -- the ones that are too small to work with the big credit bureaus -- don't know anything."

However, many organized terrorists and criminals know that small businesses can't afford to work with the big credit bureaus, which makes these mom-and-pop shops prime targets for illegal purchases and money-laundering scams, Bradley observes.

"And the worst part is that the small business can be held liable if it does do business with the bad guys, even if it isn't aware of the regulations. I haven't seen any cases yet, but the Red Flag rules won't be enforced until November, so we're just beginning to deal with those."

MicroBilt is out spreading the word on these emerging regulations because next week it will unveil a new service offering that helps small businesses vet their customers, suppliers, and even employees to comply with the OFAC and FTC Red Flag rules.

As part of its regular "risk management" service, which provides screening, tracing, and identity and background checks on potential clients or trading partners, MicroBilt will now offer a "watch list" service that checks these individuals against 63 different lists from 35 sources, including OFAC, the FBI, and Interpol, Bradley says.

"It's an easy way to be sure you're not dealing with someone you'll regret later," he says. "And it's also a way to be sure you're in compliance with the emerging regulations and databases, which are too complicated for most small businesses to deal with."

The watch list service is free with the MicroBilt service, which is sold on a per-transaction basis and includes vetting of any individual -- customers, potential employees, or even principals at prospective suppliers or trading partners. Microbilt will even guarantee the transactions of individuals vetted through its service, Bradley says.

"Any business that's in the chain of private consumer data should be thinking about these [regulations]," he says. "You need to be able to detect if you're dealing with a suspicious character, both from a business standpoint and, increasingly, from a legal standpoint."

Have a comment on this story? Please click "Discuss" below. If you'd like to contact Dark Reading's editors directly, send us a message.

Tim Wilson is Editor in Chief and co-founder of Dark Reading.com, UBM Tech's online community for information security professionals. He is responsible for managing the site, assigning and editing content, and writing breaking news stories. Wilson has been recognized as one ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Oldest First  |  Newest First  |  Threaded View
Commentary
Ransomware Is Not the Problem
Adam Shostack, Consultant, Entrepreneur, Technologist, Game Designer,  6/9/2021
Edge-DRsplash-11-edge-ask-the-experts
How Can I Test the Security of My Home-Office Employees' Routers?
John Bock, Senior Research Scientist,  6/7/2021
News
New Ransomware Group Claiming Connection to REvil Gang Surfaces
Jai Vijayan, Contributing Writer,  6/10/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
The State of Cybersecurity Incident Response
In this report learn how enterprises are building their incident response teams and processes, how they research potential compromises, how they respond to new breaches, and what tools and processes they use to remediate problems and improve their cyber defenses for the future.
Flash Poll
How Enterprises are Developing Secure Applications
How Enterprises are Developing Secure Applications
Recent breaches of third-party apps are driving many organizations to think harder about the security of their off-the-shelf software as they continue to move left in secure software development practices.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2021-35196
PUBLISHED: 2021-06-21
** DISPUTED ** Manuskript through 0.12.0 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted settings.pickle file in a project file, because there is insecure deserialization via the pickle.load() function in settings.py. NOTE: the vendor's position is that the product is not intended fo...
CVE-2010-1433
PUBLISHED: 2021-06-21
Joomla! Core is prone to a vulnerability that lets attackers upload arbitrary files because the application fails to properly verify user-supplied input. An attacker can exploit this vulnerability to upload arbitrary code and run it in the context of the webserver process. This may facilitate unauth...
CVE-2010-1434
PUBLISHED: 2021-06-21
Joomla! Core is prone to a session fixation vulnerability. An attacker may leverage this issue to hijack an arbitrary session and gain access to sensitive information, which may help in launching further attacks. Joomla! Core versions 1.5.x ranging from 1.5.0 and up to and including 1.5.15 are vulne...
CVE-2010-1435
PUBLISHED: 2021-06-21
Joomla! Core is prone to a security bypass vulnerability. Exploiting this issue may allow attackers to perform otherwise restricted actions and subsequently retrieve password reset tokens from the database through an already existing SQL injection vector. Joomla! Core versions 1.5.x ranging from 1.5...
CVE-2010-0413
PUBLISHED: 2021-06-21
** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Notes: none.