Risk

11/14/2018
11:15 AM
50%
50%

Can Businesses Stand Up to Cybercrime? Only 61% Say Yes

While 96% of US organizations say business resilience should be core to company strategy, only 61% say it actually is.

New data points to a gap between how businesses value resilience and how they implement it, Tanium researchers report.

As part of The Resilience Gap study, Tanium polled 1,000 US business decision makers to learn more about their ability to defend against cybercrime. Nearly all (96%) believe making technology resilient to business disruptions should be core to their broader strategy. However, only 61% report that resiliency is actually in place.

There remain several barriers to achieving business resilience, researchers found, specifically between internal organizational structures and access to technology and talent. More than one-third (36%) say growing complexity is to blame; 20% blame siloed business divisions. One-third say the problem is with hackers becoming more sophisticated than internal IT teams, and 17% claim their company doesn't have the right skills to accurately detect breaches in real time.

Companies need to assign responsibility for business resilience, report researchers, who explain that one of the reasons it remains unachievable is because of growing internal confusion on where the responsibility lies. But who should handle it? Some respondents say the CIO or head of IT should take charge, 33% say all employees should be responsible, and 10% say the CEO.

Poor business resilience comes with financial consequences. Thirty-two percent say they could not — or don't know if they could — calculate the impact of a breach when considering lost revenue and productivity. Eleven percent report they don't know if they could calculate response cost; 10% don't know if they could calculate the impact of lost or exposed data.

Read more details here.

 

Black Hat Europe returns to London Dec. 3-6, 2018, with hands-on technical Trainings, cutting-edge Briefings, Arsenal open-source tool demonstrations, top-tier security solutions, and service providers in the Business Hall. Click for information on the conference and to register.

Dark Reading's Quick Hits delivers a brief synopsis and summary of the significance of breaking news events. For more information from the original source of the news item, please follow the link provided in this article. View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Devastating Cyberattack on Email Provider Destroys 18 Years of Data
Jai Vijayan, Freelance writer,  2/12/2019
Up to 100,000 Reported Affected in Landmark White Data Breach
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  2/12/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
5 Emerging Cyber Threats to Watch for in 2019
Online attackers are constantly developing new, innovative ways to break into the enterprise. This Dark Reading Tech Digest gives an in-depth look at five emerging attack trends and exploits your security team should look out for, along with helpful recommendations on how you can prevent your organization from falling victim.
Flash Poll
How Enterprises Are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
How Enterprises Are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
Data breach fears and the need to comply with regulations such as GDPR are two major drivers increased spending on security products and technologies. But other factors are contributing to the trend as well. Find out more about how enterprises are attacking the cybersecurity problem by reading our report today.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2017-1695
PUBLISHED: 2019-02-15
IBM QRadar SIEM 7.2 and 7.3 uses weaker than expected cryptographic algorithms that could allow an attacker to decrypt highly sensitive information. IBM X-Force ID: 134177.
CVE-2018-1701
PUBLISHED: 2019-02-15
IBM InfoSphere Information Server 11.7 could allow an authenciated user under specialized conditions to inject commands into the installation process that would execute on the WebSphere Application Server. IBM X-Force ID: 145970.
CVE-2018-1727
PUBLISHED: 2019-02-15
IBM InfoSphere Information Server 9.1, 11.3, 11.5, and 11.7 is vulnerable to a XML External Entity Injection (XXE) attack when processing XML data. A remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability to expose sensitive information or consume memory resources. IBM X-Force ID: 147630.
CVE-2018-1895
PUBLISHED: 2019-02-15
IBM InfoSphere Information Server 11.3, 11.5, and 11.7 is vulnerable to cross-site scripting. This vulnerability allows users to embed arbitrary JavaScript code in the Web UI thus altering the intended functionality potentially leading to credentials disclosure within a trusted session. IBM X-Force ...
CVE-2019-4059
PUBLISHED: 2019-02-15
IBM Rational ClearCase 1.0.0.0 GIT connector does not sufficiently protect the document database password. An attacker could obtain the password and gain unauthorized access to the document database. IBM X-Force ID: 156583.