Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Perimeter

2/5/2010
06:14 AM
Gadi Evron
Gadi Evron
Commentary
Connect Directly
Twitter
LinkedIn
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

'Brand' Your Employees

You might want your product to be in the news every day, and for your PR to create miracles for you. But if you want attention, then your company must speak out on big security issues and news.

You might want your product to be in the news every day, and for your PR to create miracles for you. But if you want attention, then your company must speak out on big security issues and news.This is the fourth in my series of posts on security PR (see "We Have Nothing To Say -- Or Do We?", "How To Talk To Reporters", "How To Disclose A Vulnerability," and "The Secret Sauce For Security Blogging").

While you should speak on issues in the news, remember that for every news item out there, several dozen companies are trying to push their own people to get coverage from the press.

That brings is to an understanding that in the modern world, PR means getting your name out there by a mention. And speaking on issues shows your company to be experts on the subject matter.

It also follows that the more you are in the press, the more coverage you get (obviously) and the more you are considered an expert (regardless of if you really are one as we can often see when we read the news).

As we discussed in earlier articles in this series of stories on PR in the security field, reporters like talking to techies -- people who actually know what they are talking about, and they like getting the feel for actual data backing up claims.

As we discussed when we spoke of how to make the correct use of a blog for PR purposes, you should encourage your employees to talk to the press. This may not be easy in a large company, but if you are agile enough or in a startup, this shouldn't be a problem.

Techies already write the blogs, so just work with them on what's appropriate to say and how, and then they can speak to reporters more easily. The more they get quoted in the press, the more people from your organization become visible, and the more your organization becomes visible.

Your employees become more famous in their fields, draw attention to your products, draw reporters to them as the reporters will know they are the real deal, and while you build their brand, they up yours.

Some organizations may be worried about employees getting famous and becoming more expensive, or being located by bounty hunters or making them more vulnerable corporate espionage. These are legitimate worries.

Not all of your employees will become famous, but they will feel they are getting more out of working for you then just the pay. Aside to being more excited about what they do, talking about it with other employees who will also want to succeed and being coached on bettering themselves, they will publicly be associated with your company.

Some will become famous, and that's okay. As a result, some may move on, but they're likely to tell others what a good experience it has been to work for you. That kind of reputation is priceless.

But when it comes down to it, it is your calculation and decision on if, how, and when to advance each employee.

Bounty hunters would find your employees anyway, but you should certainly keep a close eye on what information you do release to the world for reasons of corporate espionage.

Bottom line: this approach may not be for you, and you may see the cons as much bigger than the pros I present. But remember, you don't need to do this with every employee. If you choose to build the brand of at least some of your employees, your brand will grow as well.

Follow Gadi Evron on Twitter: http://twitter.com/gadievron.

Gadi Evron is an independent security strategist based in Israel. Special to Dark Reading. Gadi is CEO and founder of Cymmetria, a cyber deception startup and chairman of the Israeli CERT. Previously, he was vice president of cybersecurity strategy for Kaspersky Lab and led PwC's Cyber Security Center of Excellence, located in Israel. He is widely recognized for ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
COVID-19: Latest Security News & Commentary
Dark Reading Staff 9/21/2020
Hacking Yourself: Marie Moe and Pacemaker Security
Gary McGraw Ph.D., Co-founder Berryville Institute of Machine Learning,  9/21/2020
Startup Aims to Map and Track All the IT and Security Things
Kelly Jackson Higgins, Executive Editor at Dark Reading,  9/22/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
Special Report: Computing's New Normal
This special report examines how IT security organizations have adapted to the "new normal" of computing and what the long-term effects will be. Read it and get a unique set of perspectives on issues ranging from new threats & vulnerabilities as a result of remote working to how enterprise security strategy will be affected long term.
Flash Poll
How IT Security Organizations are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
How IT Security Organizations are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
The COVID-19 pandemic turned the world -- and enterprise computing -- on end. Here's a look at how cybersecurity teams are retrenching their defense strategies, rebuilding their teams, and selecting new technologies to stop the oncoming rise of online attacks.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-25596
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-23
An issue was discovered in Xen through 4.14.x. x86 PV guest kernels can experience denial of service via SYSENTER. The SYSENTER instruction leaves various state sanitization activities to software. One of Xen's sanitization paths injects a #GP fault, and incorrectly delivers it twice to the guest. T...
CVE-2020-25597
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-23
An issue was discovered in Xen through 4.14.x. There is mishandling of the constraint that once-valid event channels may not turn invalid. Logic in the handling of event channel operations in Xen assumes that an event channel, once valid, will not become invalid over the life time of a guest. Howeve...
CVE-2020-25598
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-23
An issue was discovered in Xen 4.14.x. There is a missing unlock in the XENMEM_acquire_resource error path. The RCU (Read, Copy, Update) mechanism is a synchronisation primitive. A buggy error path in the XENMEM_acquire_resource exits without releasing an RCU reference, which is conceptually similar...
CVE-2020-25599
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-23
An issue was discovered in Xen through 4.14.x. There are evtchn_reset() race conditions. Uses of EVTCHNOP_reset (potentially by a guest on itself) or XEN_DOMCTL_soft_reset (by itself covered by XSA-77) can lead to the violation of various internal assumptions. This may lead to out of bounds memory a...
CVE-2020-25600
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-23
An issue was discovered in Xen through 4.14.x. Out of bounds event channels are available to 32-bit x86 domains. The so called 2-level event channel model imposes different limits on the number of usable event channels for 32-bit x86 domains vs 64-bit or Arm (either bitness) ones. 32-bit x86 domains...